no deadline yet. HE is being patient.Sorry to open - any news on this? If I'm not mistaken we're already past the deadline for the on-campus arena...
this bond offering will help finance the new arena,Sorry to open - any news on this? If I'm not mistaken we're already past the deadline for the on-campus arena...
Makes more sense to be near Freitas as it'd be within the cluster of other athletic facilities. It'd be on an island by itself over by Discovery Drive.UConn Update on Hockey Arena, Enrollment and On-Campus Housing Capacity and Occupancy. Vasington noted that UConn shortlisted and interviewed 3 responses to the RFEI; 2 all 3 responses gravitated toward the site near Freitas and not the Discovery Drive site. No decision has been made.
Shared versus replicated infrastructureMakes more sense to be near Freitas as it'd be within the cluster of other athletic facilities.
I read that as saying we're renovating Freitas and building a new facility. Freitas as practice ice, or maybe just a recreational rink?https://boardoftrustees.uconn.edu/w...04/Att.-32-Athletics-District-Development.pdf
Page 1 into 2.
"New" hockey arena plans under review, but also trying to renovate Freitas is still a possibility.
The Freitas renovation seems to be as a practice facility with the training and weight facilities being shared among Baseball/softball and possibly soccer. Hockey will end up benefiting from this almost by default.I read that as saying we're renovating Freitas and building a new facility. Freitas as practice ice, or maybe just a recreational rink?
The Freitas renovation seems to be as a practice facility with the training and weight facilities being shared among Baseball/softball and possibly soccer. Hockey will end up benefiting from this almost by default.
*Have* to, no. The league would certainly prefer it so UConn doesn't have to compete with other programs for game times, especially for a potential playoff QF series. It also would make UConn's recruiting significantly better to have a new on-campus rink.I hope so. Maybe used for recreational skating as well? Not sure why they need a separate practice rink if they have a new on-campus arena. We have to build something to comply with Hockey East requirements, right?
*Have* to, no. The league would certainly prefer it so UConn doesn't have to compete with other programs for game times, especially for a potential playoff QF series. It also would make UConn's recruiting significantly better to have a new on-campus rink.
I wouldn't be surprised if they do some renovations to Freitas with the intention of making it the exclusive home for the women's program. A few other schools have done that and their women's teams have excelled. It can also be a secondary practice facility for the men's team if need be. But if UConn were to build a new on-campus rink, the team would practice there regularly. It's a huge advantage to be able to practice on the same rink you play.
UMass has the adjacent practice facility so they have a rink in the event Mullins is being used by the basketball teams. BU practices exclusively in Agganis and very, very occasionally in the women's team's rink (old men's rink) when there's a concert at Agganis. BC practices exclusively in Conte.UMass has a practice rink attached to the Mullins Center. I'm not sure how other HE schools with multi purpose facilities handles practices. I suspect BU uses their former facility for practices. I've no idea where BC practices.
I don’t think BC practices exclusively at Conte by a long shot.UMass has the adjacent practice facility so they have a rink in the event Mullins is being used by the basketball teams. BU practices exclusively in Agganis and very, very occasionally in the women's team's rink (old men's rink) when there's a concert at Agganis. BC practices exclusively in Conte.
Never heard of bcu practicing at nearby rinks nor ran into them, but it's not impossible. When working for a living, it's also not as if I roved around to Brighton, Watertown, and other rinks at all hours of the day searching for the barstads.I don’t think BC practices exclusively at Conte by a long shot.
To my knowledge, they do. The only other rink nearby is the Cleveland Circle one run by the state parks and rec department, which is a piece of crap. I've never heard of them practicing there. Conte is used by both hockey and both basketball programs extensively.I don’t think BC practices exclusively at Conte by a long shot.
Yup, Reilly Memorial's the Brighton/Cleveland Circle rink I referenced. In bcu's backyard, but barring a renovation in the last decade or so not in the greatest condition. Other nearby rinks: Newton Centre, Daly, West Roxbury, Brookline, Fessenden, Babson? Never heard of such practices, but possible given Conte's shared with bcu basketball (boys and women) and women's hockey.To my knowledge, they do. The only other rink nearby is the Cleveland Circle one run by the state parks and rec department, which is a piece of crap. I've never heard of them practicing there. Conte is used by both hockey and both basketball programs extensively.
Per upcoming BOT agenda renovations to the existing rink are scheduled to begin in 2019. See page 6 of 2019 Capital Budget. Does public space mean seating expansion?
Per upcoming BOT agenda renovations to the existing rink are scheduled to begin in 2019. See page 6 of 2019 Capital Budget. Does public space mean seating expansion?
https://boardoftrustees.uconn.edu/w...s/1799/2018/06/Att.-6-FY19-Capital-Budget.pdf
Agreed, and hopefully distinct from evolving plans for a future more legit arena.That sounds a lot more like Band-Aid fixes aimed at making the place look nicer along with a few behind the scenes additions, not with the goal of using it as the regular home facility of the program.
How do you figure?The roof and the building is at the end of it's life cycle.
It was in the report that was written for the planning of the olympic facility upgrade by the firm that did the design. They recommended a new facility due to the condition of the roof and building.How do you figure?
Less than 20 years old. The building is in perfect shape. Yeah, maybe some maintenance or replace the top layer of the roof which is designed to be maintained. But for the life of me I cannot understand that statement.It was in the report that was written for the planning of the olympic facility upgrade by the firm that did the design. They recommended a new facility due to the condition of the roof and building.
Less than 20 years old. The building is in perfect shape. Yeah, maybe some maintenance or replace the top layer of the roof which is designed to be maintained. But for the life of me I cannot understand that statement.
Structural engineer? Been on or above the Freitas roof at all areas, or minimally at ceiling level at all areas, to legitimately assess the actual condition? Perfect shape based on thorough assessments by which unnamed structural engineer?Less than 20 years old. The building is in perfect shape. Yeah, maybe some maintenance or replace the top layer of the roof which is designed to be maintained. But for the life of me I cannot understand that statement.
Go read the report...the roof was engineered wrong ..the guys I know at UCFD said there was a serious worry the roof was going to collapse a few years ago when the games were moved. Sometimes just because something looks perfectly good doesn't meant thats the case.Less than 20 years old. The building is in perfect shape. Yeah, maybe some maintenance or replace the top layer of the roof which is designed to be maintained. But for the life of me I cannot understand that statement.