Do we? At this point, he's not starting, not contributing in any meaningful way, and starters of Bazz, Boat, Kromah, Daniels and Brimah you have Nolan, Facey and Giff off the bench - I'd almost say Samuel can contribute more than Calhoun at this point.Brimah showed up big time, Facey made some nice contributions, but Calhoun is still in a funk. I know he can do it, we need to get him going.
There is a big difference playing someone in blowouts and playing someone in crunch time. If UConn is up big then the other team gives up and vice versa. So I'm all for his play during crutch time. I feel KO is keeping him on a short leash and the minutes you propose to give LK and NG (both who struggled scoring in the UCF game and have had defensive lapses in games) won't change things significantly.Certainly, Coach Ollie should not give up on OC. He has the potential to be a very good contributor to the team. However, he is in much more than a simple slump for almost all of this season and it would be foolish to give him significant minutes against top notch opponents, as his +/- is consistently very negative and we cannot afford to give up that margin. Give him run when we are up 10-15 with 5 minutes to go or God forbid down 15 in the same stretch. Once he proves that he is ready to contribute again, then give him real minutes.
Right now, he is playing so far below NG and LK, it is not even debatable.
If Giffey and Kromah continue to contribute at the level they have, it's going to be hard to give him a ton of time. That said, Calhoun has the most potential of the three and could be a huge asset if he puts it together.
This!!!!If Giffey and Kromah continue to contribute at the level they have, it's going to be hard to give him a ton of time. That said, Calhoun has the most potential of the three and could be a huge asset if he puts it together.
He is definitely behind those two defensively. But he showed last season to be a better version of this season's LK and NG on offense.Most potential based on what?
Kromah is one of the better defensive players we've had in recent years and can take it to the rack.
Giffey plays tough D, shoots lights out and mixes it up for boards.
Like OC but aside from having two more seasons to play, I don't where all this " upside" is being predicted upon? The factthat he was a 5 star recruit and a volume scorer? I know it seems I'm coming off anti-Omar but I think it detracts from our other guys by not giving them credit.
He is definitely behind those two defensively. But he showed last season to be a better version of this season's LK and NG on offense.
I think his defense will improve as this season goes on. If not then I agree with you. Even if he improves to last season's offensive ability, the defense is more significant. In that case I would put him behind LK and NG.
I know the season is half over, but I think he turns things around. If I'm wrong I have no problem admitting it. I just think it's premature at this stage, particularly because the coaches are determined to play him. They have to be seeing things in practice that hasn't translated on the court.
So we're saying the same thing.My hope/ belief is that OC regains some of his touch offensively that we saw last season and can be a spark plug off the bench in the mold of say a Jason Terry/Jamal Crawford/JR Smith when they played the effective role of a bench scorer.
If OC comes in, knocks down a couple shots or plays with a lot of intensity, keep him in - if not - he has to come out as ( up until now in his career) doesn't do enough to warrant minutes over Niels or Kromah.
I trust in Ollie and believe in OC based on big games last season..I think unless it's the injury nagging him, he'll return to form.
<PRE>
Rk Player G MP PER TS% eFG% ORB% DRB% TRB% AST% STL% BLK% TOV% USG% PProd ORtg DRtg OWS DWS WS WS/40
1 Shabazz Napier 16 533 25.1 .587 .509 4.6 14.9 10.2 33.0 3.6 1.3 16.5 24.0 286 122.0 95.3 1.9 1.2 3.0 .227
2 Ryan Boatright 16 464 19.3 .549 .493 1.8 11.1 6.8 23.4 3.5 0.4 15.1 23.1 209 112.3 98.0 1.0 0.9 1.9 .163
3 DeAndre Daniels 16 453 18.6 .577 .538 5.2 13.2 9.5 3.9 1.4 5.4 11.5 21.6 180 113.8 99.3 0.9 0.8 1.7 .153
4 Niels Giffey 16 309 20.7 .800 .809 5.3 12.2 9.0 4.8 2.0 3.1 16.4 15.4 108 137.1 99.2 0.9 0.6 1.5 .194
5 Lasan Kromah 16 318 14.1 .525 .516 3.7 9.7 6.9 10.4 2.6 1.5 13.0 17.7 100 105.9 100.2 0.4 0.5 0.9 .112
6 Amida Brimah 16 202 20.6 .686 .697 12.2 8.9 10.4 0.9 0.3 22.1 17.8 12.3 57 126.6 95.8 0.4 0.4 0.8 .167
7 Phillip Nolan 16 183 15.9 .615 .553 10.2 13.0 11.8 5.8 0.6 4.8 12.7 14.7 61 127.6 100.8 0.5 0.3 0.8 .166
8 Tyler Olander 16 151 12.3 .527 .444 8.5 7.2 7.8 2.2 2.2 1.9 0.0 11.4 39 134.0 101.8 0.3 0.2 0.6 .149
9 Omar Calhoun 16 269 9.4 .476 .429 2.2 10.3 6.6 4.1 0.8 1.4 14.5 23.9 94 92.4 103.9 0.0 0.4 0.4 .056
10 Kentan Facey 11 47 11.9 .390 .385 22.4 27.5 25.2 3.7 0.0 2.1 6.1 17.1 16 107.9 94.8 0.1 0.1 0.2 .143
11 Terrence Samuel 10 46 11.0 .540 .545 0.0 15.1 8.2 27.9 1.2 0.0 30.8 24.2 18 88.5 101.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 .048
12 Leon Tolksdorf 5 15 18.7 .409 .409 15.6 19.9 17.9 32.5 3.7 0.0 8.3 39.2 10 97.7 91.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 .140
13 Tor Watts 4 4 18.2 .333 .333 0.0 24.8 13.4 0.0 14.0 0.0 0.0 36.7 2 74.8 66.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 .098
14 Pat Lenehan 4 6 -23.8 .000 .000 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.6 0.0 0.0 25.0 32.6 1 17.2 112.5 -0.1 0.0 -0.1 -.407
</PRE>
Most potential based on what?
Kromah is one of the better defensive players we've had in recent years and can take it to the rack.
Giffey plays tough D, shoots lights out and mixes it up for boards.
Like OC but aside from having two more seasons to play, I don't where all this " upside" is being predicted upon? The factthat he was a 5 star recruit and a volume scorer? I know it seems I'm coming off anti-Omar but I think it detracts from our other guys by not giving them credit.
Neither Kromah or Samual has the ability to put a good team away. OC does
Rewatch some games from last year especially Cuse.
He never had a D1 handle and actually might be little better this year.
His forte is shooting. That's a confidence thing which can change at any moment.