As someone noted above, from where did the legend of Omar's talent originate?
The guy's per 40 numbers are the same or worse than last year, and last year he was about as good as he seems to be now.
Where did all the hype come from that this guy was going to be a great 3 point shooter?
Last year, in his last 7 games, from 3 he shot:
1/3, 3/5, 1/5, 0/0, 2/5, 3/5, 1/6, 1/9. That's 12 for 38. That's 31%.
D'Oh? What? That was after his hips started bothering him?
Okay.
In his first 9 games, from 3 he shot:
0/1, 2/4, 0/4, 2/5, 1/3, 3/6, 0/4, 1/4, 0/4. That's 9/35. That's 26%.
His assists per 40 last year were 1.6. This year it is 0.8. His turnovers are up to 2.6 from 2.3. His rebounds are down to 4.5 from 4.9. Steals are down to 0.5 from 1.2. His 2 point % is down to 43% from 50.
Point is, Omar is just not very good, and Omar has not been good since he's been at UConn.
Why do so many people believe that this kid simply needs to "break out of a slump"? A two year slump?
The fact that he has very poor shooting form and a low release does not work to his favor.
It's great that he toughed it out and stayed with UConn through a ban year, but enough's enough. He's had his chance and then some to earn his spot.
His minutes should start going to Facey or to other players.
We don't "need him to make a deep run." That myth needs to be set aside.
What we need is somebody who can rebound more than 4 in a 40 minute stretch and not be a black hole who is an incredibly streaky shooter.
Play Facey - it's hard to imagine we'd be losing much, overall, with the substitution, and I don't care about 1s, 2s, 3s, and 4s, because if Omar can't pass, and his shooting is crap, and he has a very weak handle, then what difference does it make what number we put on him or Facey?