- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 2,968
- Reaction Score
- 18,906
Whose mother is Garrett?
If KO provided Shonn Miller’s mother with $30,000 wouldn’t that be easily traced? Unless he gave her gold bullion this is an easy one right?
KO is Satoshi Nakamoto. The alias now makes sense. He paid her in Bitcoin.If KO provided Shonn Miller’s mother with $30,000 wouldn’t that be easily traced? Unless he gave her gold bullion this is an easy one right?
This must mean he's really striking out with getting anything from UConn. That he now has to dip down to Plan H to try and get some money from this situation...
It also may have happened even if monkeys flew out of my butt.He may very well be striking out with getting anything from UConn. But Ollie has been very very angry about the accusation from Miller about paying the mother. This suit may have happened even if Ollie was to get his full 10mil from UConn.
It also may have happened even if monkeys flew out of my butt.
Seriously though, I'm sure a lawyer can better educate us on how winning a slander case against an individual is extremely difficult. My cursory knowledge is you have to prove 3 elements; 1) false, 2) publication, 3) negligence. It will be hard enough to PROVE #1 to a court, 2 and 3 against an individual I think is really difficult. Standard that otherwise the courts would be chock full of everyone suing everyone else for gossip. But again leave it to lawyers for how legally slander is applied to statements to a court.
Regardless, seems obvious that its yet another PR stunt and lawsuit meant not to actually adjucate the merits in a court room, but to simply get $ in any and every way possible other than say diligently coaching basketball teams to earn money.
I didn't say it was gossip, I said it wasn't published by Glenn Miller. One of the three elements of libel is published.Miller said it to NCAA investigators though, so I wouldn't call it gossip. If UConn based its decision to not honor his contract in part on Miller's testimony, then there are damages.
If UConn ever gets dinged for this, you can blame it on the AD and President. Given what's going on all around college basketball, and what has been going on for many years, they will have cost themselves a lot more than $8m when all is said and done if UConn is hurt by this.
I’ve enjoyed everyone cheering on Miller while they ignore this accusation.
Does anyone think this is true - 30k seems to buy better players than Miller.
I've equally enjoyed the "rat squad" lambasting Miller.
The best defense for slander is truth - if Miller's lawyer can prove any of this, the rat squad can shut up forever, and UConn sails against Ollie.
Your second statement is yet another in a never-ending line of frivolous arguments to put out the fire by throwing other people's gasoline on it.