Seems like logic that could have been as easily applied during this season and 2012. This is the third transfer and the fourth to leave - do you think people outside this program are more likely to rationalize that as a player or a program problem?
Meanwhile, Gonzaga nearly won the title with three transfers in their starting lineup. Perhaps at some point we need to acknowledge that the methodology of college coaches is a bit antiquated. You don't need to kiss guys' asses or even be diplomatic, but if you can't convey your vision to a particular player in an accessible way, the buck stops with you sooner or later.
In regards to Juwan Durham, Ollie was not selling sand in the desert. He was the quintessential Ollie player, and losing him is a disaster that cannot be marginalized. Whether or not his talents pan out, the ceiling of next years team is a lot lower today than it was yesterday. You can't force a kid to stay, but barring undisclosed variables, Durham's decision to leave was as audacious and indictment on everything Ollie is selling as we have seen. This was Durham looking Ollie in the eye - and whether he was nudged out due to lack of work ethic or autonomously decided to go elsewhere is irrelevant - and telling him he doesn't believe in him as a coach, motivator, or mentor. He thinks so little of his foundation here that he has opted to go somewhere else and start over. That is the responsibility of the coach, the program, the players, and even the University/students. They couldn't get through to him that this was something that could work even when he had every incentive in the world to believe it could.