- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 7,501
- Reaction Score
- 15,690
He is contesting being fired for cause. He wants arbitration and should get it. This is simply part of the process. He wasn't going to accept 0.He wants to keep his job.. wow
He is contesting being fired for cause. He wants arbitration and should get it. This is simply part of the process. He wasn't going to accept 0.
It will happen fairly quickly and coincidentally be settled by the the second weekend if the tourney. I am sure this is all expected and why AD DB fired him today.This is not gonna be fun.
Except that it's in his contract and is his right. Besides that, yeah!Arbitration. Lol. Screw that. Put him in front of a jury. There’s a reason he wants arbitration. UConn should not let that happen.
Question: why is he afforded union protection that is meant for faculty, professors, etc?
Question: why is he afforded union protection that is meant for faculty, professors, etc?
Its not - this is the current one UCONN-AAUP-CBA-07-01-17-06-30-17.pdf and the pages you are looking for are 12 & 13. It's a process that started today w/ the formal notification to Ollie
Except that it's in his contract and is his right. Besides that, yeah!
It will happen fairly quickly and coincidentally be settled by the the second weekend if the tourney. I am sure this is all expected and why AD DB fired him today.
Question: why is he afforded union protection that is meant for faculty, professors, etc?
He is a member of a professors union. Posted in other threadState employee im guessing.
FROM the article:Is there a binding arbitration clause in his contract? If so, UConn needs to fire the lawyers working for the the AD. If there isn’t, he can go pound sand.