Oh, that front court... | The Boneyard

Oh, that front court...

Status
Not open for further replies.

Fishy

Elite Premium Poster
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
18,257
Reaction Score
133,338
...is going to be a problem. Outside of Brimah's flashier bits and Daniels' currently well-hidden potential, the front court is a grease fire.

Daniels, Nolan, Brimah, Facey, Olander and Tolkesdorf combined for three rebounds. Three.

That's like 41' worth of front court vertical and they managed three rebounds - that's a Boatright's worth of rebounds, but with the care and feeding of 35 additional feet.

Shabazz had 11 rebounds which is equivalent to like 150' of rebounding in just a tiny lil six-foot container. In terms of output, he's a nuclear power plant compared to the flea-market toaster that is our front court.

Terrence Samuels had three rebounds in five freaking minutes - the same total as our front court needed sixty-plus minutes and six players to grab.

Two conclusions...

1) Our collection of tall oafs had best get their s--- together. The basketball is not made of lava - you can grab it without bursting into flames.

2) Shabazz Napier is the most valuable player in the country.

UConn is deep, but they'd be lost at sea without Bazz.
 
Joined
Aug 12, 2013
Messages
462
Reaction Score
258
Announcers in the game said that if guards are getting more rebounds than bigs that its because the bigs are boxing out and guards coming under neath to grab the board...even so yea these numbers suck for our big men
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
6,101
Reaction Score
19,314
...is going to be a problem. Outside of Brimah's flashier bits and Daniels' currently well-hidden potential, the front court is a grease fire.

Daniels, Nolan, Brimah, Facey, Olander and Tolkesdorf combined for three rebounds. Three.

That's like 41' worth of front court vertical and they managed three rebounds - that's a Boatright's worth of rebounds, but with the care and feeding of 35 additional feet.

Shabazz had 11 rebounds which is equivalent to like 150' of rebounding in just a tiny lil six-foot container. In terms of output, he's a nuclear power plant compared to the flea-market toaster that is our front court.

Terrence Samuels had three rebounds in five freaking minutes - the same total as our front court needed sixty-plus minutes and six players to grab.

Two conclusions...

1) Our collection of tall oafs had best get their s--- together. The basketball is not made of lava - you can grab it without bursting into flames.

2) Shabazz Napier is the most valuable player in the country.

UConn is deep, but they'd be lost at sea without Bazz.

Last year, we couldn't rebound and gave up layups on he glass. Now we still give up rebounds, but we have a good chance to block the put back. So that's progress.

Really the issue is mostly that DD isn't pulling his weight yet (and Giffey has been more 2 than 4). Brimah is a better shot blocker than a rebounder at this point and isn't going to be a double-double guy, but gives us an element we haven't had and is still adjusting to all the jostling that goes on down low. Next time Facey gets a little burn, it would behoove him to snark up every rebound he can - that's his ticket to more burn.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
9,402
Reaction Score
34,497
Announcers in the game said that if guards are getting more rebounds than bigs that its because the bigs are boxing out and guards coming under neath to grab the board...even so yea these numbers suck for our big men



Interesting perspective. Frankly, it's possible. Kids don't box out anymore, they rebound by going up and getting the ball. If we are actually. boxing out, maybe the announcers are right.

I always found that when I boxed out, I had trouble getting the ball. I focused so much on keeping my man from getting boards that I was unable to grab it! If our bigs are really focused more on blocking out than rebounding, quick guards will sneak in and grab the ball.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
5,360
Reaction Score
23,760
Announcers in the game said that if guards are getting more rebounds than bigs that its because the bigs are boxing out and guards coming under neath to grab the board...even so yea these numbers suck for our big men
Explain the 20+ offensive rebounds Yale took down. Who were our guys boxing out, Each other?
 
Joined
Aug 12, 2013
Messages
462
Reaction Score
258
Explain the 20+ offensive rebounds Yale took down. Who were our guys boxing out, Each other?
Lol ...maybe only 1 big boxing out?...how do u explain 11 boards by napier?
 

nelsonmuntz

Point Center
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,646
Reaction Score
34,643
The confusion up front was palpable. We played a little too much 3 guard, but that is no excuse for what went on tonight.
 

Fishy

Elite Premium Poster
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
18,257
Reaction Score
133,338
Explain the 20+ offensive rebounds Yale took down. Who were our guys boxing out, Each other?

Exactly - it's delusional.

The front court wasn't boxing anyone out - they gave up 22 offensive rebounds. They gave up 21 second-chance points while managing to tally up all of one second-chance point of their own.

The idea that they were doing anything effective on the boards is absurd.
 

joober jones

Finally Non-Fat Guy
Joined
Nov 2, 2011
Messages
4,736
Reaction Score
9,654
If he could just keep out of foul trouble, Nolan would have better rebounding numbers.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
16,902
Reaction Score
26,747
KO was pissed at the end of game interview, very unhappy. He knew the rebounding numbers without looking at the box score.
 
C

Chief00

It is true, even on the other team's foul shots the rebound doesn't happen automatically. Not enough strong guys. Amida to his credit does battle but numbers don't lie. Frankly if everyone played the same minutes it would be Bazz and then Samuel as our rebound leaders. Nolan was a disappointment tonight.
 
Joined
Aug 31, 2011
Messages
1,495
Reaction Score
6,817
I'm not worried, KO will get them ready.

Good post. Fishy's quite right that they have to get better but our two main guys are a soph who barely played last year and a frosh so...you'd anticipate them getting better. Too much gnashing of the teeth for 2 games in.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
6,101
Reaction Score
19,314
Exactly - it's delusional.

The front court wasn't boxing anyone out - they gave up 22 offensive rebounds. They gave up 21 second-chance points while managing to tally up all of one second-chance point of their own.

The idea that they were doing anything effective on the boards is absurd.

We only missed 20 shots - and five of them were open perimeter jumpers by our four man which obviously means we didn't have much in the way of numbers attacking the offensive glass on those plays. Our offensive rebounding was a non-issue.

The other end was a problem, but as is the case when you give up 22 offensive rebounds, there are different reasons for some of them. Six or seven were off our 13 blocks (a couple of which went o/b, which counts as a team rebound). A couple were long rebounds off of bricks. Probably 10-12 were just getting outworked under the basket, which is way too many against the likes of Yale. Most of those were our bigs just not blocking out (their PF had 8 offensive boards). But a couple were our bigs doing a good job, but other guys crashing in and keeping the ball alive. Yale stopped balancing the floor and just sent everyone to the glass in the last 10 minutes. If we could have just gobbled a couple of those up, we would have had a fun fast break drill and forced them to stop doing that (we finally did late, but by then it was just garbage time).

We have a lot of work to do, yes - but last year felt like a hopeless cause based on personnel. This year we need some youngins to grow up a little, learn better technique and get a little tougher. There's more potential - even just battling against each other in practice is at least a more productive drill. Last year, we couldn't simulate a DI front line in practice.
 

huskyharry

Hooyah
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
3,578
Reaction Score
4,285
Yale was best in the Ivy at rebounding margin last year and they returned a lot of their players. Yale did shoot an awful % which gave them many more rebounding opportunities but as Coach Ollie said it is a problem that they have to work on. Other than TO, who didn't play a ton, our bigs are all on the thin side and are pushed out of the way by more muscular players.
Rebounding is clearly our weakness but we've known that for a long time.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
3,217
Reaction Score
10,690
Our bigs need more weight. They get pushed around like leaves down low
Yes i agree that our bigs are stick men. If we had a Jeff Adrien, there would be no rebounding issues. Its not too late to have guys like Brimah, Nolan, Facey, and even Olander hitting the weight room hard to bulk up for the tournament.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
33,903
Reaction Score
98,756
The announcers are dopes, no one boxes out except Brimah who at least attempts to sometime........I will temper my hopes on the prediction thread for wins as i did not add "crappy rebounding" to the end which will put them on the bubble.......this was truly discouraging. It's too early to harp on it but to look that bad against a smaller Yale team is not good, not good at all.

I wouldn't want to be in practice today and Shabazz may be the only one who doesn't need to be in on the drills......the bigs have a LONG way to go. Too early to tell but scary enough to think Detroit may tell us more quickly!!!
 

Dmike

Waiting for the Snow and 3 pointers to fly
Joined
Oct 10, 2013
Messages
225
Reaction Score
458
Our bigs need more weight. They get pushed around like leaves down low

Exactly, I am far more concerned about our waist size than our length down low. Our bigs should be relegated to eating a pancake instead of running laps every time they get beat in the box out drill. That'll fatten up 'cause you know Shabazz will beat them to 2 out of 3 of those caroms every time.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
4,322
Reaction Score
7,421
I really don't understand how anyone can play basketball without boxing out. Especially when playing man-to-man defense. After your man gets his 2nd or 3rd rebound a light bulb has to pop up.

Its even more fun to box out and have an easy rebound come to you while a frustrated opponent must cool their heels.
 
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
1,726
Reaction Score
4,146
Is it something that isn't taught to these kids in pee wee basketball?
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
587
Reaction Score
790
The announcers are dopes, no one boxes out except Brimah who at least attempts to sometime........I will temper my hopes on the prediction thread for wins as i did not add "crappy rebounding" to the end which will put them on the bubble.......this was truly discouraging. It's too early to harp on it but to look that bad against a smaller Yale team is not good, not good at all.

I wouldn't want to be in practice today and Shabazz may be the only one who doesn't need to be in on the drills......the bigs have a LONG way to go. Too early to tell but scary enough to think Detroit may tell us more quickly!!!


While the announcers may be dopes, they attributed that statement to Larry Brown. Not saying this is not an issue, it is huge. Just saying where the statement came from.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
6,101
Reaction Score
19,314
Sometimes it isn't as simple as "nobody is boxing out":

1) Shot blockers take themselves out of the play for the rebound. Brimah right now has the mindset of contesting everything - he has to learn the nuances of when to stay at home. It'll take time.

2) If guards don't contain penetration, boxing out assignments are lost as defensive help is forced to rotate and players are left open. We haven't been all that great this year at containing the ball.

3) You are only as strong as your weakest link. If three guys block out perfectly, and the fourth doesn't, than that fourth opponent is often going to have a red carpet to the basketball, since your three guys are going to be engaged with an opponent and won't be able to go get the ball as quickly.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
442
Guests online
2,933
Total visitors
3,375

Forum statistics

Threads
160,207
Messages
4,220,809
Members
10,083
Latest member
ultimatebee


.
Top Bottom