Non-Key Tweets | Page 955 | The Boneyard

Non-Key Tweets

Still not a done deal with Cal, Stanford and SMU yet. Could they sneak UConn and Tulane in there?

SMU is essentially paying for Cal and Stanford to have half shares. The expansion of the ACC Network to Dallas and SF is pocketed by current ACC members. This is a band aid. Extra money for 7 years. Then all three schools will be full members and it will cost the other ACC schools money, just a few years before the GOR ends. The ACC likely implodes at the end of the seven years when the buyout of the GOR is more realistic.
 
I am not sure why anyone with a brain is still questioning whether these media companies are pulling the strings. Both ESPN and Fox have pretty much constructed these conferences based on what they would like.

Fox got UConn on the cheap with the Big East contract, which is one of the reasons why we didn't get into the B12.

UConn has to push the Big East to get into the streaming contract vs. putting all of their eggs with Fox. UConn might have to go to the streaming route on its own to prove its media worthiness.
I mostly agree with that, but for the PAC schools they're paying them more in other conferences than they were in the PAC. If the idea is better matchups and they'll recoup it, then why doesn't the same logic apply to UConn? Why are we the only ones they want on the cheap?
I do mostly believe the media is pulling the strings, but that part confounds me.
 
UConn and the service academies for football only. No problem
As now, Army appears unlikely to return to any conference. West Point prefers flexibility scheduling opponents and relative difficulty.

As now, Navy would likely remain in a western-ish division. Annapolis likes its’ current Texas recruiting access and would potentially like similar in California with annual San Diego State games.

As unlikely as a football-only newly configured PAC X/AAC/MWC may be in exchange for a few hoop games, potential dinero, AD/BOT pursuit/reaction, etc may be interesting. Wouldn’t bet any of your houses …
 
I mostly agree with that, but for the PAC schools they're paying them more in other conferences than they were in the PAC. If the idea is better matchups and they'll recoup it, then why doesn't the same logic apply to UConn? Why are we the only ones they want on the cheap?
I do mostly believe the media is pulling the strings, but that part confounds me.

As others have posted...it is football.
 
The amount of expansion-generated revenue that goes toward the incentive initiative as opposed to being distributed equally among members is a key issue that could determine whether Phillips can get the required 12 of the 15 schools to approve adding new members, a person briefed on the ACC’s talks told AP.
 

Online statistics

Members online
219
Guests online
1,237
Total visitors
1,456

Forum statistics

Threads
163,967
Messages
4,376,933
Members
10,168
Latest member
CTFan142


.
..
Top Bottom