Even Flug has written off UConn so no expansion is probably our best outcome.
If AAC stays intact a raid on the MW is very plausible..
Texas Tech and Texas to UConn, UC, and UH...UT = Queen of the Mean Girls (the other Texans).
Talk about some serious irony possibly waiting to happen.
Houston gets rejected by Big 12.
Houston makes college playoffs.
Big 12 gets shut out of college playoffs.
The icing on the cake would be Houston would have to have beaten UL in order to get there.
Asking for a lot but one can dream.![]()
Regarding CR, what's an NKT? Thanks in advance.Not the best news, but for those of thirsting for even a NKT, it's like a long cool drink of water.
Non-Key TweetRegarding CR, what's an NKT? Thanks in advance.
Not that I expect this to happen, but if the Big 12 doesn't want to look too foolish by going through all this and then not expanding at all, a 2-team UConn/Houston package would seem to be a fairly reasonable compromise. UConn, more than any other candidate, furthers OU's goal of opening up new markets for a potential Big 12 Network, and UT still gets the Texas school it wants in. Assuming, of course, that both sides are actually interested in reaching a compromise, which seems a doubtful prospect at best.
Here is the crazy thing. Schools not named Texas are going to walk from $150M over the next 8 years for the promise of nothing in return?
That makes zero sense.
Something else has to be going on.
Like I said, they are doing so with what appears to be nothing in return.For Iowa St, Baylor and TCU along with possibly K State, Texas Tech, and OK ST, its turning down $150 million now for the opportunity to have a P5 beyond 2024 because if Texas (and Oklahoma) blow-up the XII in 2024, those school are likely G5 candidates making a million or two a year.
In any conference you will have "dead weight" or else everyone will .500 which is called mediocrity. Every school in the AAC fills a partial need. That the conference could not generate any significant TV revenue was a function of lack of seasoning and success by any of its teams when formed. Houston has it this year. Last year it was Temple and Houston (and how did Temple fall back so quickly?).Not sure why people think the American would raid the MWC. We'd have to start a new conference and shed less valuable schools. There is too much dead weight.
To that we'd have to free up Tier 3 rights, for which we'd be paid more than we receive under the current AAC TV deal. That would undoubtedly make the conference TV deal worth less. So the only way UConn is a in a position to make that happen is if they have an alternative conference arrangement waiting in the wings.Become the big dog of the AAC in FB like UConn is in BB and help write the next media deal to Uconn's advantage.
To that we'd have to free up Tier 3 rights, for which we'd be paid more than we receive under the current AAC TV deal. That would undoubtedly make the conference TV deal worth less. So the only way UConn is a in a position to make that happen is if they have an alternative conference arrangement waiting in the wings.
Say you are a Big 12 member not named UT or OU...if there is a 4-team eastern expansion with Fox backing but those two programs bolt in 2024, does the following remain a power conference?
(I'd like to think KU would have the potential for a conference upgrade if those two leave and I know UConn fans would feel the same about their program - but for the sake of this exercise, let's say we both are on the outside looking in).
Baylor
Cincinnati
Houston
Iowa State
Kansas
Kansas State
Oklahoma State
South Florida
TCU
Texas Tech
UConn
West Virginia
Or if they blow up the whole expansion thing and the conference moves towards dissolving, that would also benefit us.As much as I think the day to day whipsawing of momentum is all fiction, I do not think it would a bad thing for us if pure chaos were introduced to the Big 12 decision mix.
We look like plan C for the Big 12. If some refuse to vote for plan A and some refuse to vote for plan B, then either nothing happens or they throw up their hands and settle for plan C.
The Big 12 doesn't seem to be too good at compromising and coming to mutually agreeable terms.As much as I think the day to day whipsawing of momentum is all fiction, I do not think it would a bad thing for us if pure chaos were introduced to the Big 12 decision mix.
We look like plan C for the Big 12. If some refuse to vote for plan A and some refuse to vote for plan B, then either nothing happens or they throw up their hands and settle for plan C.
Which is why I been saying forever that if B12 expand without UConn, we need to take the lead and form a nationwide FB only conference with big markets to maximize the next TV deal. We can park our other sports in the BE while keeping our T3 rights. That's the best way to maximize TV dollars.
If the FB only conference can sign a deal with Twitter or Google with new user viewing experience, it can maximize TV dollars and draw in new viewers.
The Big 12 doesn't seem to be too good at compromising and coming to mutually agreeable terms.
The problem is, the 2 most influential players in the Big 12 don't appear to care whether the conference lives or dies. Normally there'd be some incentive to get some sort of expansion done to ensure survival, which would open the door to a "Plan C". But that doesn't seem to be the case here.
Definitely agree on Texas, they have a sweetheart deal in the B12 and want to keep that. Not sure I agree on OU because while they've got a nice deal in the B12, they're still 1A to Texas and could get a similar setup and deal in a league like the B1G or SEC if the invite came.Oh, Texas and Oklahoma care. Texas wants to keep the XII together as long as it is owned by U Texas for the benefit of U Texas. Oklahoma wants to keep the XII together as long as the Sooners gets equal treatment as the Long Horns. And thus the problem...