- Joined
- May 29, 2015
- Messages
- 1,735
- Reaction Score
- 7,514
To clarify for the literal and humorless: Oklahoma simply has a nice fanbase in the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex.
Do Houston next!
To clarify for the literal and humorless: Oklahoma simply has a nice fanbase in the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex.
Do Houston next!
I'm glad you noticed that because my original post was in he present tense.
The past tense more correctly reflects my feelings that this event should have already taken place.
It may have but i"m sceptical.
20 minutes, eh? Sounds about right ...... I guess I'll just pretend I have no opinion of my own. For at least twenty minutes...
Rule #1 of Conference Realignment... exhibit 5482:
Rule #1 of Conference Realignment... exhibit 5482:
Oh, and UConn should go to the ACC, no matter what the yahoos in the backwoods say.
Yeah and I'd add that Flugar has been clear that his source is a Big Ten guy who talks to someone at OU. And anyone who follows CR (even without following Flugar or any twitter yahoos) knows that it was always OU and Boren who was trying to push this stuff forward but that the final outcome wasn't necessarily up to Boren alone... I always viewed Flugar's info that it would probably be UC/UConn or UC/BYU as being Oklahoma's preference. And when it came time to butt heads with Texas, the LHN was always going to be a tough nut to crack. So it's a really bad outcome for UConn but I'm not mad at Greg, because he was always representing one point of view in a room with 12 schools plus ESPN / Fox. (He could be full of crap still, or not, but what happened today doesn't necessarily mean he was full of crap).ME: Okay, unlike some here I'm not going to be hard on the Flug. He, like many who live in that region, has an affection or affinity with the college programs and is too emotionally connected to those programs to see the reality of the situation. The Big 12 is just not a conference that's built for the long term. Say what you will about the ACC but fans in the ACC want to be in the ACC. The Big 12 has fans like OU fans who want to get out, Texas fans who think everything is fine and a bunch of smalltime schools with smalltime fans who talk too much smack about how great the football is while ignoring the academic, social and political realities of college sports.
Oh, and UConn should go to the ACC, no matter what the yahoos in the backwoods say.
Ah, Anthony Weiner puppy... it's been a while.
Have to give him a little credit for not trying to change his tune when his source was wrong, and not trying to back out of the heat. Unlike the Dude who changes direction like with a water diviner.
Whale your healthy skepticism has long ago crossed the boarder into unhealthy cynicism.
The difference is the complete lack of hope of any kind and
To be honest he was pretty much spot on in the evaluation . His mistake ( or his sources ) was to assume expansion was a fait accompli.
That was a logical conclusion based on long term B12 stability.
Some Presidents in all likelihood went to the meeting. Expecting expansion .
Maybe BYU was in the mix ,but their strict religious ideology ,gave them a huge hurdle.
Sorry I disagree ,any skepic knew that Flug couldn't possibly know what many of the conference presidents didn't know. Your the one one making the assumption that we gullible idiots bought into a Twitter prediction. I don't think is was taken as anything other than a rare positive non key tweet swimming in a sea of negative tweets.This is incoherent babble. For one, anyone with google could see nobody is getting a new TV network. Secondly - expanding today doesn't not change the calculus for the Big 12 in 2025.
Nobody they can expand with is going anywhere and nobody they can expand with makes it any more likely the league stays together in 2025.
So you can go with a measured analysis of the scenario or you can go with people on Twitter talking out of their arses. I get the Twitter people are saying what you want to hear - but think about that proposition. People in athletic departments are leaking information to people with a few thousand followers on Twitter. Even if they were legitimate people - why would they feed them anything valuable? Why not risk your job over sharing information with someone who posts it on Twitter?
Maybe the.best boneyard move is claiming that 'inside' information that proves incorrect was still 'inside' information. If you claim something is going to happen based
on inside information and it does not happen - by definition this was not inside information. It was BS speculation.
Sorry I disagree ,any skepic knew that Flug couldn't possibly know what many of the conference presidents didn't know. Your the one one making the assumption that we gullible idiots bought into a Twitter prediction. I don't think is was taken as anything other than a rare positive non key tweet swimming in a sea of negative tweets.
To dismiss all information from that source is very short sighted
His prediction was the two best candidates were UConn and UCinn.
I believe it was at a time when UConn wasn't being talked about. So he apparently had some inside knowledge.
If the B12 bothered to evaluate 7 teams as likely candidates , a less knowledgeable person than yourself might take expansion as a logical eventuality. The fact that UConn and UCinn faired very well in that evaluation might lead one engaged in speculation to make that prediction. That is a prediction based on on those facts with the assumption that expansion was a given.
This prediction is at least grounded in some fact.
As a manager if a person provided you with two facts and then proceeded to make an incorrect assumption based in those facts . I wouldn't so much question their sources as their judgement.
To be fair you have been known to speculate on the gullibility of posters that you really have zero idea if they are doing anything other than playing the game. Or are your just engaging in your BY contrayian persona. Either way it's not that important.Speculation drives this board. Contrarianism gives that speculation balance.
PS
That first post was not related to the second and was a classic Sarcasm post. I think you would have enjoyed . I'm now sorry I deleted it as reading the first line takes the post out if context. I'm sorry if I offended you.