- Joined
- Sep 18, 2011
- Messages
- 6,073
- Reaction Score
- 27,323
Pro sports like MLB and NFL are single entities when it comes to a business model. College football consists of individual programs acting either individually, within an inside conference, within an outside conference, overpaid programs, underpaid programs. Just stating the obvious. I don't see how any of it makes sense long term until programs like Texas, Michigan, etc. decide they are tired of sharing their revenue with the likes of Kansas State and Rutgers. And no, the former do not need the latter in order to exist. I like to look at extremes. Perhaps more programs decide to go independent to the point where they will be included in the playoffs, or a drastic realignment creates maybe two outstanding conferences consisting of perennial Top 25 programs, geography be damned altogether.
Pro sports are not single entities when it comes to business model. The revenue disparity is much greater in the NFL and MLB than in P5 college football. Dallas had revenues of $620 million last year and the Vikings had $281 million, or a $331 million gap, which is about 2x Texas' total athletic spending. MLB is the same way. Yankees had $508 million in revenues and Tampa Bay had $188 million, or a $320 million gap.
Pro sports survives with the revenue gap and so will college sports.

