- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 91,831
- Reaction Score
- 351,536
At best, Frank the Tank has outlined a sequencing issue. if you want to break the GOR by dissolving the conference, get your dissolution vote in prior to giving your withdrawal notice. It’d be easy enough to have a vote on dissolution and make the effective date far enough in the future so that everyone meets their Notice of withdrawal obligations. Now people are probably saying well if you dissolve the conference should there be any notice of withdrawal obligation. Perhaps not, but the non-exiting members of the client conference could indicate that they had acted in good faith and relied upon the withdrawal period being honored.While I agree with most of FTT's commentary, I do question how dissolution of the conference would not be a way out. If the rights weren't granted to the conference, who were they granted to? If the rights were granted to the conference, I imagine some language on successor could keep the rights intact but I would need to see this to fully believe it could be enforceable.
If it's dissolved (which I don't think they have enough votes for) there wouldn't be any non-exiting members.At best, Frank the Tank has outlined a sequencing issue. if you want to break the GOR by dissolving the conference, get your dissolution vote in prior to giving your withdrawal notice. It’d be easy enough to have a vote on dissolution and make the effective date far enough in the future so that everyone meets their Notice of withdrawal obligations. Now people are probably saying well if you dissolve the conference should there be any notice of withdrawal obligation. Perhaps not, but the non-exiting members of the client conference could indicate that they had acted in good faith and relied upon the withdrawal period being honored.
I agree. Something has to happen. A few schools, like UNC, Duke and UVA, have too much to lose and endless resources.Something will “give” in the ACC. The ACC can’t have all of the top schools in their conference unhappy for the next 10 plus years.
Updated story…
Penn State QB Sean Clifford, Big Ten commissioner Kevin Warren discuss improving benefits
-> Big Ten football players have had conversations with league commissioner Kevin Warren this week about giving athletes a bigger voice in the future and about improving a variety of benefits for players. Warren also spoke with the leader of a nascent players' association about the possibility of having an independent group represent the players in conversations with the league.
Penn State quarterback Sean Clifford said the conversations with Warren have been a positive, collaborative start to giving players a seat at the table in future decisions with the league. He said he and the other players he has spoken with have no intention of creating a union or entering a contentious negotiation with the league at this point.
Warren issued a statement later Friday saying that the Big Ten has, indeed, started "the process of formalizing the Big Ten Student-Athlete Advisory Committee to seek input from our student-athletes, including Sean Clifford, about the changing landscape of college athletics." He added that the conference "has not had any negotiations with the CFBPA, or any players' organization, and do not have any scheduled." <-
Link seems broken. What is it about?
are you using the Share > Copy link to Tweet feature? Give us something to work with here.Second attempt to post
Just copy and paste the tweet (not the URL).Second attempt to post
And the power of Jordan BrandThe power of Mack Brown. But also, how was Alabama 19th 4 years ago? I know it was an ugly loss to Clemson, but still.