MattMang23
Adding Nothing to the Conversation
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2011
- Messages
- 5,142
- Reaction Score
- 14,716
I'll just let the picture speak for itself as she gazes deeply into your eyes...
I'll just let the picture speak for itself as she gazes deeply into your eyes...
It's only a matter of time before we see moves like this.Sarcasm aside, I've been calling for us to can M golf, M/W tennis, M/W cross country to get down to NCAA minimum and save some cash.
Yep.
The dudette of West Virginia.
Mrs. Dude
The dudette of West Virginia.
Mrs. Dude
Men's Baseball ,Soccer ,Hockey and Track,and every women's sports are all money losers .Women's sports alone lose $20,000,000 a year.
Tim Montemayor @TheMontyShow 7h7 hours ago
I am told there are as many as 6 #BIGXII members against expansion with no clear supporter of expanding the conference as of today.
Tim Montemayor @TheMontyShow 7h7 hours ago
#TCU has become more assertive in the #BIGXII expansion conversation telling #Boren two weeks ago they were not in favor
Tim Montemayor @TheMontyShow 5h5 hours ago
Sources saying OU was holding GOR over other members heads and now they want out on a free pass #BIGXii
In that scenario, I would expect whoever's left in the Big 12 to simply backfill by cherry-picking the most attractive available schools from the AAC or wherever. I think that's far more likely than a wholesale merger with the AAC (and would also probably create a stronger conference with a lot less dead weight).Let OU and UT out, they can drag along OSU and someone else and merge the remaining parts into the AAC. Wouldn't be the worst outcome for UConn, and who knows maybe a goose drops a B1G or ACC future bid from the heavens.
In that scenario, I would expect whoever's left in the Big 12 to simply backfill by cherry-picking the most attractive available schools from the AAC or wherever. I think that's far more likely than a wholesale merger with the AAC (and would also probably create a stronger conference with a lot less dead weight).
isn't that in the next year or so?It's P5 or AAC until the BE buyout runs out. Anything else would lose you money.
Just as the Big East was allowed to keep their seat at the BCS table, the Big 12 will keep their P5 tag, till this contract period runs out.If the Big 12 loses Texas, Oklahoma and Kansas, it is unlikely they are adding anyone. The remaining league is no better than the MWC or AAC without the three anchor schools.
I thought the playoff has supplanted the BCS. The P5 designation can remain with a weakened B12, the only real meaning it has is voting rights on NCAA football matters and automatic berth(s) in New Year's Day bowls that are not part of the playoff that year. The automatic bowl berth(s) may get yanked if the 2 big dogs leave the B12 in the future.I think the Big12 could have a longer life than that if the Big12 GOR happens after the BCS contract. I think they are both right around 2024/2025.
If the BCS contract is first, not sure how they could whittle the P5 down to P4 without breaking the Big12 GOR.
These things have been incredibly fluid so it will be interesting to see how things transpire. Will it be Big East 2.0? The GOR makes it a little different from the Big East situation... but greed has a way of finding solutions and if there is a desire to reduce the number of mouths, someone will figure it out.
regardless, you can bet ESPN will have their fingerprints on whatever ends up happening.
you are correct. I'm calling the new format BCS although technically it is the College Football Playoff.I thought the playoff has supplanted the BCS. The P5 designation can remain with a weakened B12, the only real meaning it has is voting rights on NCAA football matters and automatic berth(s) in New Year's Day bowls that are not part of the playoff that year. The automatic bowl berth(s) may get yanked if the 2 big dogs leave the B12 in the future.
I think the Big12 could have a longer life than that if the Big12 GOR happens after the BCS contract. I think they are both right around 2024/2025.
If the BCS contract is first, not sure how they could whittle the P5 down to P4 without breaking the Big12 GOR.
These things have been incredibly fluid so it will be interesting to see how things transpire. Will it be Big East 2.0? The GOR makes it a little different from the Big East situation... but greed has a way of finding solutions and if there is a desire to reduce the number of mouths, someone will figure it out.
regardless, you can bet ESPN will have their fingerprints on whatever ends up happening.
Isn't there some clause in the B12 by law that states if a certain number of schools leave the conference, the conference cease to exist? That would be a quick way to end the GOR.
If OU, OSU, Kansas, and Texas bail tomorrow, would that kill the conference? I remember reading something about that.
B12 is dead man walking. Why wait until 2024 or 2025? B12 can destroy itself tomorrow if right number of schools leave now.
Just as the Big East was allowed to keep their seat at the BCS table, the Big 12 will keep their P5 tag, till this contract period runs out.
Is that the number? I'm sure they will backfill like the Big East did.Don't you need at least 8 schools to be considered a viable conference?