sdhusky
1972,73 & 98 Boneyard Poster of the Year
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 9,272
- Reaction Score
- 6,556
Yes, but even non-profits need to be solvent.
Really? Everthing a non profit does has to make money???
Yes, but even non-profits need to be solvent.
Really? Everthing a non profit does has to make money???
Everything BYU does is about its religious mission. But it shows BYU football and basketball games and presumably if they joined and a B12 network was started, they'd have to amend or give up those rights. I don't have ratings numbers, but you'd have to assume those games are among their highest-rated programs.Their network has a religious mission, not profit. its a overall money loser.
You will fit right in here on the boneyard bashing Rutgers in your fist post.First time poster here...
With conference realignment, Rutgers is like the Trust-fund kid ( that nobody likes) who never did anything notable but inherited a path of financial stability.
Everything BYU does is about its religious mission. But it shows BYU football and basketball games and presumably if they joined and a B12 network was started, they'd have to amend or give up those rights. I don't have ratings numbers, but you'd have to assume those games are among their highest-rated programs.
The more this is shaking out, it really looks like Cincinnati is #11 and #12 is a vote between BYU and us, if they decide to expand.
Why wouldn't we be #11, if a network is the most important angle to this expansion? I'm curious as to why everyone has penned Cincinnati in as such a certainty? Did I miss something somewhere?Everything BYU does is about its religious mission. But it shows BYU football and basketball games and presumably if they joined and a B12 network was started, they'd have to amend or give up those rights. I don't have ratings numbers, but you'd have to assume those games are among their highest-rated programs.
The more this is shaking out, it really looks like Cincinnati is #11 and #12 is a vote between BYU and us, if they decide to expand.
Everything BYU does is about its religious mission. But it shows BYU football and basketball games and presumably if they joined and a B12 network was started, they'd have to amend or give up those rights. I don't have ratings numbers, but you'd have to assume those games are among their highest-rated programs.
The more this is shaking out, it really looks like Cincinnati is #11 and #12 is a vote between BYU and us, if they decide to expand.
Geographic partner for WVU, better football program, Ohio recruiting in-roads, good-enough TV market, 800 miles closer to B12 territory than Storrs. If they're going to add one geographic outlier in BYU, adding another on the complete opposite side of the country who isn't a competitive slam dunk in football (we're not even close) isn't something I can see a lot of presidents warming up to when there's another acceptable option that's closer.Why wouldn't we be #11, if a network is the most important angle to this expansion? I'm curious as to why everyone has penned Cincinnati in as such a certainty? Did I miss something somewhere?
Was just going to post the same thing. The Cincy stuff is simply noise. You want something more than noise..........the hiring of Tranghese. To me, they brought him in to negotiate not sell. You don't do that this late in the game to simply push the merits of the university. You do that to close.Why wouldn't we be #11, if a network is the most important angle to this expansion? I'm curious as to why everyone has penned Cincinnati in as such a certainty? Did I miss something somewhere?
The network has to be funded in some respect, whether they take profit from it or put that money into another initiative, I don't know. The point is, the network is there and if an invitation from the Big 12 and a B12 network were to be explored, it's something that would have to be considered by both sides.How does the LDS church make a profit when they feel the hungry and house the homeless?
According to you, they must be making a profit somewhere.
Football? You give UConn a few years in the Big12 and they will run circles around Cincy. Everything is in place, sans conference affiliation, for UConn to become an upper tier football program.Geographic partner for WVU, better football program, Ohio recruiting in-roads, good-enough TV market, 800 miles closer to B12 territory than Storrs. If they're going to add one geographic outlier in BYU, adding another on the complete opposite side of the country who isn't a competitive slam dunk in football (we're not even close) isn't something I can see a lot of presidents warming up to when there's another acceptable option that's closer.
We have two things going for us, that the OU president has stated as important to expansion. Academics and the better market. Is it enough? I don't know. Cincy was 7-5, this year, we were 6-6. Have they been consistently better than us? Yes but their not Alabama and were not Idaho as a comparison. Yes they are closer to WVU and yes they have a more fertile recruiting area. They have their positives we have ours. I say concede nothing ahead of time and fight to be 11.Geographic partner for WVU, better football program, Ohio recruiting in-roads, good-enough TV market, 800 miles closer to B12 territory than Storrs. If they're going to add one geographic outlier in BYU, adding another on the complete opposite side of the country who isn't a competitive slam dunk in football (we're not even close) isn't something I can see a lot of presidents warming up to when there's another acceptable option that's closer.
Start thinking with your brain and not your heart, this is an irrelevant argument. Sure, we'd probably improve in the B12, but so would they. The difference is, their track record over the past five+ years has been consistent success in football. Since Edsall left, ours has been as a joke. Give them the same opportunity to be a B12 team and there's no reason to think they become even better as well.Football? You give UConn a few years in the Big12 and they will run circles around Cincy. Everything is in place, sans conference affiliation, for UConn to become an upper tier football program.
If metrics are really driving the process, it could be UConn/BYU. That would be a world class kick for Cinci.The network has to be funded in some respect, whether they take profit from it or put that money into another initiative, I don't know. The point is, the network is there and if an invitation from the Big 12 and a B12 network were to be explored, it's something that would have to be considered by both sides.
That said, the further this goes, the more the tea leaves come out, it appears this is a decision between BYU and UConn. It's very, very difficult to foresee a scenario where 11/12 are those two schools. They won't leave Cincinnati on the table for that option. If you want a slam dunk option for UConn, hope and pray Boren pulls a rabbit out of his hat and convinces FSU and Clemson to jump ship to the B12. Then we're home free.
Oh absolutely, we shouldn't concede and should most definitely continue propping our positive value, academics, TV potential, basketball, etc. My only point is, as team #11 they have a major leg up on us. Our best argument is to be team #12 with them, as opposed to team #11 + BYU instead of them.We have two things going for us, that the OU president has stated as important to expansion. Academics and the better market. Is it enough? I don't know. Cincy was 7-5, this year, we were 6-6. Have they been consistently better than us? Yes but their not Alabama and were not Idaho as a comparison. Yes they are closer to WVU and yes they have a more fertile recruiting area. They have their positives we have ours. I say concede nothing ahead of time and fight to be 11.
I'll agree to disagree. Your argument has some good points. I still say for a conference network, we are the better add. Our WBB will provide content people want to watch for such a network. Our MBB is at least as big an advantage over their MBB as their FB is over ours.Oh absolutely, we shouldn't concede and should most definitely continue propping our positive value, academics, TV potential, basketball, etc. My only point is, as team #11 they have a major leg up on us. Our best argument is to be team #12 with them, as opposed to team #11 + BYU instead of them.
Women's bball is an absolute ratings nonstarter when comparing it to football. It simply is. Yes, our girls bring in some good ratings a few times a year, and are a great add-on argument for us. We can say hey, look at all of these positives we have - and also, by the way, you get our women's program too on top. As a primary argument, it won't work. But I still think this notion that we should be competing against UC for a spot is horribly misguided. We need to be pitching ourselves as a better option than BYU and potentially the other Florida schools and/or UH. Though it appears those schools are progressively gaining less traction.I'll agree to disagree. Your argument has some good points. I still say for a conference network, we are the better add. Our WBB will provide content people want to watch for such a network. Our MBB is at least as big an advantage over their MBB as their FB is over ours.
Women's bball is an absolute ratings nonstarter when comparing it to football. It simply is. Yes, our girls bring in some good ratings a few times a year, and are a great add-on argument for us. We can say hey, look at all of these positives we have - and also, by the way, you get our women's program too on top. As a primary argument, it won't work. But I still think this notion that we should be competing against UC for a spot is horribly misguided. We need to be pitching ourselves as a better option than BYU and potentially the other Florida schools and/or UH. Though it appears those schools are progressively gaining less traction.
Greg Flugaur @flugempire · 57m57 minutes ago
My statement on Barry Tramel audio...
I will only refer you to our Jan 3rd & Feb 15th tweets.
The Conception & Birth of...
UC/UCONN to B12
Greg Flugaur @flugempire · 52m52 minutes ago
http://cdn.stationcaster.com/stations/wjox/media/mp3/Berry_Tramel-1455895199.mp3 …
Listen.
As we reported on Feb 15th
Cincy/UCONN to Big 12.
Greg Flugaur @flugempire · 51m51 minutes ago
http://cdn.stationcaster.com/stations/wjox/media/mp3/Berry_Tramel-1455895199.mp3 …
Tramel indicates Cincy-BYU-UCONN 2 out of the 3 on Audio.
FOX wants Eatern P5 content...to play ball.
UC/UCONN
Martin borg @Martyaborg · 48m48 minutes ago
@flugempire yes but ESPN wants byu. Byu is not out just yet
Greg Flugaur@flugempire
@Martyaborg
ESPN already has BYU...and at good market prices.
ESPN won't let FOX get into FLA.
So FOX gets 2 Eastern P5 Schools content
Martin borg @Martyaborg · 36m36 minutes ago
@flugempire your very informed for sure. Your point of ESPN not pushing byu in big 12 because they own byu is every byu fans worst fear
Martin borg @Martyaborg · 25m25 minutes ago
@pedrodon @BostonCoug big12 will add eventual add who ESPN/fox want. As a byu fan I have to wonder would ESPN push byu in or keep byu Indy?
BostonCoug @BostonCoug · 21m21 minutes ago
@Martyaborg @pedrodon couldn't the same question be asked of other candidates? ESPN gets them more cheaply in the ACC, correct?
BostonCoug @BostonCoug · 16m16 minutes ago
@Martyaborg @pedrodon sorry. Meant to say AAC.
Martin borg @Martyaborg · 17m17 minutes ago
@BostonCoug @pedrodon excellent point.
How do you expect a non-profit to function if it can't even pay it's bills? Just because something is designated as a non-profit doesn't mean the employees work for free and there aren't basic operational costs associated with running the organization.
The major benefits of a non-profit status are tax-related. Major deductions and benefits. That doesn't preclude them from having costs associated with their operation and running a television network incurs major costs.