According to that article:Parts of the settlement essentially give Clemson veto power over some ACC decisions, McKenzie said, which creates a “two-tier membership structure where Clemson has greater rights than others” on some fundamental matters.
Read more at: https://www.thestate.com/sports/college/acc/clemson-university/article309947815.html#storylink=cpy
"The ACC agreed to make four amendments to its constitution and bylaws regarding its exit fee and grant of rights and also established a new Multi-Media Revenue Policy (for the aforementioned brand initiative rewarding schools with higher TV viewership). The ACC cannot alter any of those changes without Clemson’s consent.
McKenzie said the section about the ACC needing written consent or a “yes” vote from Clemson in order to alter policies regarding its withdrawal fees, revenue distribution and “brand initiative” policies essentially gives Clemson “veto power.”
Here is McKenzie's tweet:
Note that he does not say that Clemson and FSU have veto power over any schools that are to be added.
You have stated several times on this board that Clemson and FSU must approve the addition of any school. I don't think that is correct.