- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 33,954
- Reaction Score
- 99,055
Not for nothing, but the guys fawking name is Mick, not Nick. Mick "gery" Cronin.
Thanks damn, he looks like a Nick even thought he's a Mick……Must be the black suit…….Nick Cronini
Not for nothing, but the guys fawking name is Mick, not Nick. Mick "gery" Cronin.
That may be asking quite a bit from a Bearcat. At the University of Cincinnati, the ability to read puts you in their honors program.Do some reading son.
He rebuilt a program that had 1 scholarship player on the roster when he got the job. He is 98-37 the last 4 season...Cronin's winning percentage is something like .605. Why is there such a love fest for the dude? He hasn't advanced past the Sweet 16 in his 8 years as coach.
kobe said:He rebuilt a program that had 1 scholarship player on the roster when he got the job. He is 98-37 the last 4 season...
Let me know when Cincy wins something of note. No conference championships since joining the BE, no big runs in the tourney.2009-2013 93-48 or .695. Greatest accomplishment, making it to the sweet 16. Still not impressed.
*EDIT*
I should say that I am not impressed enough to be in love with him like some here appear to be. I would be embarrassed if I were a Bearcat fan with his antics on the sideline. Not just today, but any day. He is a winning coach in D1 basketball. I respect him for that.
I wont be following them that closely. Ask Kobe, im sure he will let you know.Let me know when Cincy wins something of note. No conference championships since joining the BE, no big runs in the tourney.
No, it has nothing to do with being on track to graduate. How could a one semester player at Kentucky be on track to graduate. Regarding UConn, there are two issues at stake.
1. They brought forward the APR due date forward without allowing schools who were in danger to do anything about it. In prior years, teams were exempted when they showed improvement (UConn had 3 years of great scores when they were banned). The judgment left UConn with absolutely no chance to comply or ameliorate things.
2. APR is simply this: 1 point for a player returning to campus in the fall, 1 point for a player returning to campus in the spring. 1 point for a player finishing fall semester, 1 point for a player finishing spring semester. Add up points and divide by 13 then multiply by 1000 (in order to make an arbitrary measure somehow look hefty). Exceptions: if a player leaves for the pros, no matter his GPA, his points are exempt (in the spring). If a player transfers with less than a 2.6, you are docked points.
In UConn's case, we had a kid who completed 3 years of schools and one semester who then left without completing his degree. He dinged UConn for 2 points. UConn also had 2 players transfer without 2.6s. Both killed the APR, and that's how UConn was below the 930 cutoff.
This doesn't even account for the fact that all schools have a different way of going about sending athletes to classes. Some don't care (some of the ACC and all of the SEC). Others have actual classes. So you're comparing apples to oranges. Now, UConn has near perfect APR scores for several years. if you think UConn has improved academics for basketball players, you might be wrong. It's much more likely that UConn has learned how to use intersession courses so that players leaving for the pros or transferring are exempted from counting against you in the APR.
It's just a phony NCAA thing that means nothing. It has absolutely nothing to do with graduation. You get no credit for players graduating.
Here's a funny fact: Harvard was below the APR cutoff for 2 straight years, whereas Kentucky has been acing it. That's a joke.
kobe said:The Academic Progress Ratings have nothing to do with academics? What?
I love Cronin's popeye mean mug. Kills me every time.
I like Cronin, I'm not sure about the out of bounds call, but he had a few legitimate gripes. Samuel hammered one of his players and the end result was UConn ball on a possession arrow. I thought the game was pretty evenly officiated for the most part, but Cronin was fighting for a team that seemed to play flat. To opposing fans maybe that's being a , when it's your team's coach it's passion and there's nothing to be embarrassed about. Cronin took over a dumpster fire and has done a good job. We'll always get the last laugh with Cincy, we got Kemba and they didn't.
Valentine's behavior was the most embarrassing. Cronin ran over to dispute the call, I don't know what he said, but Cronin didn't lose it until Valentine jumped in his face. There is no reason for a ref to jump in a coach's face like that, Valentine instigated the whole thing.
Yes he did. He took a hard swing at the ball, got his hand on the ball, his arm all over the Cincy player's arms knocking him to the ground.That was a free ball and Samuel got his hand on it.
huskiesnyc said: