Next up SMU

[champs99and04]

UConn is a 1.5 point dog tomorrow, for all the "this should be a comfortable win" folks.

 

[Mots010]

Who's saying this should be a comfortable win?

 

[champs99and04]

Who's saying this should be a comfortable win?

See post #16

 

[imno1]

While I usually acknowledge Mauconn as an astute fan and support his views, I'm not sure I can agree with this one. NG and TO have been waiving the same old tired fake on each and every possession for 3 1/2 years and it rarely gets any defensive players to even consider the fake. I think rather than going to this weak effort, both NG and TO would be far better served powering into the paint and basket for dunks, easy lay-ups and fouls. As for DD, don't EVER allow him to hang around the 3 pt line and attempt those long shots. He's out of rebound range, put back success and can't effectively shoot the 3.

Daniels is shoot 43% from 3. Not to bad considering the start to his season.

 

[Hoophound]

UConn is a 1.5 point dog tomorrow, for all the "this should be a comfortable win" folks.

That tells you more about this team's current reality than much else. Vegas thinks we should be ranked in the 50's. They are right more often than not. If you want to see a major turn around with this team three things need to happen. Daniels needs to get back to being a star, OC needs to play better (not spectacular) and one of our big men needs to rapidly develop into a player.

We have seen all of these types of things happen almost overnight so many times before that I am holding out hope. UConn teams tend to suddenly "kick the window out" and play great basketball, as JC said of the 2004 team. We need a couple of great performances from these guys to get in rhythm and transform themselves. I don't expect it until mid to late February but I sure would like to play decent basketball until then. I think this team can be much better. Our weaknesses can become our strengths. We have a huge group of good guards and wings. They need to play to their strengths and start mixing things up. Let's see Giffey get some looks, let's see Kromah get aggressive going to the rim and most importantly, get Deandre playing aggressively. I'm so sick of all these damn jump shots. Go to the rim and just keep attacking.

 

[mauconnfan]

UConn Don is on to something. Even Phil Nolan has the occasional ball fake like he's going through the motions during practice against skeleton D. But they all need to ball fake, show the ball on the fake, a lot more because then they can go strong. Notice these guys, every one of them including DD, get smaller when they just catch dribble once and go "strong", they don't get bigger and stronger. The ball fake enables them to be patient, slower and then attack. I could be wrong but the unfortunate reality is none of these guys know what "strong" is when shouldering in and trying to finish!

But I hear ya Don…….

 

[BFieldHusky]

Feeling pretty good about this game for some reason. SMU is no slouch- an up and coming program (at least until Larry Brown retires in 2-3 years) and the place will be electric but will THEY be ready to play..I think we will. That NYE loss has to have stung. We have upperclassmen that do not want to go 0-2 in league play, especially in THIS league..we'll see but I think we bring A effort, which means aggressive wing defense, which hopefully means turnovers and run outs. I don't know that much about SMU but I think our guards will pressure the out of their guards. If that happens their bigs won't be as effective, even if they are their strengths. I'm looking forward to this game. Then come home boys. Enough time in TX already..

Good point about the pressure. SMU has turned it over 180 times in 13 games.

 

[babysheep]

The unfortunate fallout with print comments is that, in the absence of tone etc., there is a great deal of room for misinterpretation. There, in both choice of words and intent, was no criticism whatsover in my remarks. They were simply observations based on post-game comments and my conclusions(in Bazz' case my concern that he clearly understood what happened and took responsibility but did not seem to understand why it happened and recognition, in KO's case, that he took responsibility for the team's lack of readiness and has more than enough knowledge and experience to develop effective solutions for the problems). Your interpretation of my remarks as critical is very definitely not accurate.

In addition, while I don't read the board on a daily basis; and certainly don't, for reasons of time, scan more than a page or two of the most recent posts, I have never had even a slight impression that Bazz is frequently criticised and unable to please most posters with the quality of his play. In fact I find the exact opposite to be true.

That was a more general comment, not targeting you specifically, hence "let's". You're certainly right on the text issues, as it just went back the other way! It is sad, but there is some real complaining going on by some of the more reactionary posters here on KO and Bazz. You can see the thread titles where people are already questioning whether or not KO is the coach for the future as well as the decision to hire him.

 

[UConn_Top_Dog]

I have a bad feeling we lose this game...

Yup! I knew it!