Newman or Adams? | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Newman or Adams?

Who?


  • Total voters
    120
Status
Not open for further replies.
Adams would be my pick. Newman looks like a great scorer but with Ali coming he will be our SG, and I wouldn't trade Ali for Newman no matter what the rankings say.
 
Newman. Normally the hype and press from having the top recruit is great for a program, but since we're UCONN not Duke etc, ESPN would bury the story...
 
Newman. I like Adams but people here are falling too much in love with him simply because he's from New England.
 
Haven't seen either play, so I won't vote.

But I will say that if Adam Silver has his way, there won't be any 1-and-dones anymore.
 
Neither if they are one and doners. Give the scholarship to a kid who wants to play college ball. UConn's last two titles were won because
the point guards stuck around to play college ball for at least three years. You won't win with these one and doners unless you can recruit five every year.
 
I'll give you credit, you've posted some nonsensical stuff. You're saying you won't win with a kid who's one and done on your team unless you have five of them?
 
I guess what I don't understand is why you equate Adams with winning but not Newman. I agree that in some cases you are better off with 3 or 4 year guys versus one and dones. With that said (and I've posted this before) the youngest team in the NCAA tournament has made the final four every year since 2011, and won the title twice. Young / very talented players can also win titles.
These one and doners are the reason UConn has one the last two titles. These one and doners are actually hurting the top schools as they have to rebuild every single season. Giffey, Napier, Boatright and Daniels have played three seasons together that's why they won.
 
It didn't just start in the digital age.. this has been around nearly 30 years and pretty much EVERYBODY knows what it is...

30 years ago, high school juniors weren't doing it. Let's see when it hits middle school.
 
I'll give you credit, you've posted some nonsensical stuff. You're saying you won't win with a kid who's one and done on your team unless you have five of them?

Nonsensical for an idiot. One and done means NBA player, One NBA player won't win a title. Five NBA players, even freshmen, and you have a shot. Kentucky is cycling five NBA players every year. The other teams aren't. What did Parker do for Duke? What is Ennis going to do for Syracuse this year. Both of those guys need to be replaced.
 
Nonsensical for an idiot. One and done means NBA player, One NBA player won't win a title. Five NBA players, even freshmen, and you have a shot. Kentucky is cycling five NBA players every year. The other teams aren't. What did Parker do for Duke? What is Ennis going to do for Syracuse this year. Both of those guys need to be replaced.

Pretty sure Melo did it
 
We don't need a PG if Terrence Samuel can develop his jumpshot the way Shabazz had.
 
These one and doners are the reason UConn has one the last two titles. These one and doners are actually hurting the top schools as they have to rebuild every single season. Giffey, Napier, Boatright and Daniels have played three seasons together that's why they won.

There aren't many schools outside of UK with a lot of one-and-done kids.. and trust me, they're not hurting.. anybody not named UConn would kill to be them.. 3 out of the last 4 Final Fours and a national title
 
Nonsensical for an idiot. One and done means NBA player, One NBA player won't win a title. Five NBA players, even freshmen, and you have a shot. Kentucky is cycling five NBA players every year. The other teams aren't. What did Parker do for Duke? What is Ennis going to do for Syracuse this year. Both of those guys need to be replaced.

You continue to make absolutely no sense. So if you have one one and done player (i.e. "NBA player") you won't win? How about if you have one of those and two guys who play two years in college? Can you win then?

You're just making arbitrary rules that have no basis in reality. Incidentally, as someone else said, Kentucky has been to 3 of the last 4 Final Fours with one championship so they must be doing something right.
 
Hold on. We did not win 2 championships because other teams were weakened by one-and done players. Florida? Michigan? Iowa State? The team that took us to overtime? Maybe we beat KY because they over-rely on those players and we had a team. There just are not that many teams with those NBA-ready players and I think only 1 of them crossed our path.
As far as 2011, I think KY was about the biggest challenge we faced in the NCAA. But we beat a lot of good teams in and out of the BE that did not fit that definition.
I don't want to be KY either but some of this rationale is silly.
 
We don't need a PG if Terrence Samuel can develop his jumpshot the way Shabazz had.

Shabazz had a jump shot already though big difference……….I hope he can but it's ugly no doubt. He's a good player anyway, solid in a back up role and who knows how much more. UConn will be playing a lot of 3 guard line ups for a few years it would seem.
 
Hold on. We did not win 2 championships because other teams were weakened by one-and done players. Florida? Michigan? Iowa State? The team that took us to overtime? Maybe we beat KY because they over-rely on those players and we had a team. There just are not that many teams with those NBA-ready players and I think only 1 of them crossed our path.

This is pretty much it. Most teams don't function on an exclusive one and done basis. And we beat them anyway.
 
I want the kid who grew up a UConn and Bazz fan, knows what the program stands for and wants to win NC's because he's seen a couple most recently from close to home.

ADAMS is my choice and I love his game!
 
Hold on. We did not win 2 championships because other teams were weakened by one-and done players. Florida? Michigan? Iowa State? The team that took us to overtime? Maybe we beat KY because they over-rely on those players and we had a team. There just are not that many teams with those NBA-ready players and I think only 1 of them crossed our path.
As far as 2011, I think KY was about the biggest challenge we faced in the NCAA. But we beat a lot of good teams in and out of the BE that did not fit that definition.
I don't want to be KY either but some of this rationale is silly.

We beat Florida if Bradley Beale is taking jumpers?
 
Melo is not just an NBA player but a first ballot Hall of Famer. We'll have to make exceptions for Hall of Famers.

Kind of at odds with your post in another thread, but OK. You said Shabazz would get eaten up by Magic Johnson (which is obvious), who isn't just First Ballot, but challenges for GOAT. Top 5 guy.

So we include GOATs but not regular first ballot Hall of Famers? How about second ballot guys? I'm confused here.
 
Last edited:
This is pretty much it. Most teams don't function on an exclusive one and done basis. And we beat them anyway.
Repeat. Did you take in a Washington Wizard game this year? See the guy playing along side Wall? If Beale stays three years like Kemba or four years like Shabazz, we do not beat Florida.
 
Hold on. We did not win 2 championships because other teams were weakened by one-and done players. Florida? Michigan? Iowa State? The team that took us to overtime? Maybe we beat KY because they over-rely on those players and we had a team. There just are not that many teams with those NBA-ready players and I think only 1 of them crossed our path.
As far as 2011, I think KY was about the biggest challenge we faced in the NCAA. But we beat a lot of good teams in and out of the BE that did not fit that definition.
I don't want to be KY either but some of this rationale is silly.

I thought Arizona was by far the toughest challenge. And it was a toss up between UK and SDSU.
 
Melo is not just an NBA player but a first ballot Hall of Famer. We'll have to make exceptions for Hall of Famers.

So we should ask when they are in high school if they plan a HOF career?
Not sure I get your FL point either. We beat them twice. They were one of the very best teams we faced. Are you saying they would have beat us?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
253
Guests online
1,471
Total visitors
1,724

Forum statistics

Threads
164,067
Messages
4,380,847
Members
10,177
Latest member
silver fox


.
..
Top Bottom