New PAC-12 Forming | Page 7 | The Boneyard

New PAC-12 Forming

The new PAC 12 might help UConn.. if the PAC 12 can get schools from the aac and mwc it will leave a lot of conferences looking for new conference mates… potentially the aac looking at UConn for a football only invite
 
Exit 4 said:
We won't be having more than some pleasant short conversations with the new P12 because the travel costs and strain to play these schools will not even be remotely worthwhile.

This is also because the discussions with the B12 and ACC have not reached a full conclusion. Expect more UConn B12/ACC talk this spring.
Expand ...
yeah more "talk"...thats all it is. talk and no actual actions.
 
GoConn said:
yeah more "talk"...thats all it is. talk and no actual actions.
Expand ...
That maybe.... but because that talk is real, its another reason won't be having any such P12 discussions besides perhaps listening to their initial pitch.
 
UConnTrumbull said:
Joining the PAC whatever in all sports is also a nonstarter. Like are we being serious right now? Offer football only/partial share and basketball scheduling agreement for non-conf match ups. If they say no, so be it.
Expand ...
When did I ever say I wanted to do that?

The school will do whatever is financially advantageous for them. Realistically, there isn’t anywhere near enough money involved to make it attractive to us. But if somehow they patched together a $15M TV deal you can bet the school would have to do their due diligence.

I mean they talked to freaking CUSA for crying out loud. Not remotely saying we’re going to go but pretending there isn’t a number out there that wouldn’t make us have to consider it (even if it’s unattainable for the PAC12) is dumb.
 
huskymedic said:
Nah… the teams will just get better access because they are part of a FBS Conference.



(Shortcut)

-> But slapping a Pac-12 logo on Fresno State’s helmet does not mean Fresno State is now a Power 5 school. No one should be under any delusion that this new conference will be viewed in the same orbit as the ACC, Big Ten, Big 12 and SEC.

It doesn’t particularly matter because the 12-team College Football Playoff includes automatic berths for five conference champions. Simply by being in a conference — any conference — Washington State and Oregon State have a more viable path to the Playoff than they do in their current state as independents that have to finish high enough to earn an at-large berth. And that, frankly, is far more important than a few extra million dollars per year in television revenue. <-
Expand ...




Just get a seat @ the CFP adult table.
 
noeynox said:
If i said that i was wrong, i meant to say they WOULDN'T automatically be given Autonomy conference status.

Power5/Autonomy is an official designation given to 5 conferences. The PAC had their's removed.
Expand ...
They retain their autobid if they get 8 members
 
.-.
The Yakk said:
After all that horse poop, we get to your condescending analysis of what is best for UConn. Gee thanks, and also please fûćk off somewhere else with your conference fantasies.
Expand ...
Well said! Isn't it amazing how non-UConn fans come to this board to tell us that it's best if we just stay in our conference?! As if the panacea to all our woes is to keep the status quo, meanwhile the status quo for other conferences isn't sufficient for their purposes. Not a fan of this double standard. Sorry, huskies are both intelligent and stubborn, and true UConn Huskies fans know we have to keep fighting for relevancy.
 
I don't often go for the "football only addition" of UConn, but the new PAC 12 would be the exception to my rule. It would give 6+ games that would be guaranteed, and would allow us to get more presence on west coast recruiting.

Having said that, it wouldn't happen until they get another 2 full-time schools to reach their minimum 8. And joining them in all sports would be a non-starter. As others have mentioned, there could be a scheduling alliance set up for football at a minimum...
 
UConnDan97 said:
I don't often go for the "football only addition" of UConn, but the new PAC 12 would be the exception to my rule. It would give 6+ games that would be guaranteed, and would allow us to get more presence on west coast recruiting.

Having said that, it wouldn't happen until they get another 2 full-time schools to reach their minimum 8. And joining them in all sports would be a non-starter. As others have mentioned, there could be a scheduling alliance set up for football at a minimum...
Expand ...
I might be for it if Memphis, Tulane, and another FBS school on the East Coast came with. If not we would be on a complete island with no neighbors in sight
 
cellocgg said:
I might be for it if Memphis, Tulane, and another FBS school on the East Coast came with. If not we would be on a complete island with no neighbors in sight
Expand ...

Memphis & Tulane are in the Storrs neighborhood??

Hell, UMass bailed for a conference with neighbors. Indy is going to be more painful. If for some reason a full football only offer materializes - I would find it hard to turn down.
 
cellocgg said:
I might be for it if Memphis, Tulane, and another FBS school on the East Coast came with. If not we would be on a complete island with no neighbors in sight
Expand ...
For what? Full addition of all sports??

No chance at all! If Memphis and Tulane are the keys for you to say yes, then you need to drive another car... we literally left that car a couple of years ago...
 
.-.
cellocgg said:
I might be for it if Memphis, Tulane, and another FBS school on the East Coast came with. If not we would be on a complete island with no neighbors in sight
Expand ...
Like USF? Then they'll have the Northeast, the South East, and the West Coast/Rockies. Bye bye Parody PAC, hello new Pacific Atlantic Conference!

Good thing we get football tomorrow to distract us from these zany CR rumors.
 
UConnDan97 said:
For what? Full addition of all sports??

No chance at all! If Memphis and Tulane are the keys for you to say yes, then you need to drive another car... we literally left that car a couple of years ago...
Expand ...
Football only I meant
 
cellocgg said:
Football only I meant
Expand ...
If you're taking about football only, we don't require any further additions. This gives us a minimum of 6 games, and we schedule the other 6 independently (plus we get a Pac12 championship game possibility). Right now, we are scheduling 12 games independently, so this takes care of half of our schedule with their tv partner, and we get the other 6 under a separate tv partnership...
 
Looking at this solely from an ideal outcome (considering all constraints) for us, the solution would be for the PAC to add Gonzaga, St Mary's and one additional WCC member as but football members of the conference and add us, Army and Navy as football only members. This may have been a bit more feasible if Army hadn't already joined the AAC.
 
Drew said:
I really need UConn fans to stop thinking UConn football only anywhere is a serious option. Nobody on Earth thinks it’s realistic except us. It’s a complete and total non-starter.
Expand ...
hope GIF

... but don't take it away from me.
 
.-.
The Yakk said:
Not going to happen. FSU/Clemson lawsuits are trainwrecks, and there is no certainty of available spots in the P2. No school is going to voluntarily pay exit fees/GOR settlements to make a lateral move to the B12.

MAYBE FSU pays up to jump to the B10 or SEC, if either of those conferences will have them. That's it. Not exactly "gutted".



Not going to happen. Stanford and CAL signed ACC GOR. They are there until 2036.



LOL Memphis LOL Temple.



LOL more like 25%, assuming there are still even conference media contracts when the current ones expire. Look, we get that you are a Big12 fan--and congrats on the nice payouts your schools are currently getting--but TX and OK leaving your conference has destroyed a lot of value, and the remaining schools will realize that at some point. There is a lag, like every other financial impact, but it will happen.



ACC, maybe. PAC, LOL.



Probably true, not really a controversial prediction.



LOL so there's going to be a P3 and the Big12 is grandfathered in. Good for you!



After all that horse poop, we get to your condescending analysis of what is best for UConn. Gee thanks, and also please fûćk off somewhere else with your conference fantasies.
Expand ...
Yes it appears the ACC is going to lose schools, and likely some of those end up in the B12. That's widely known as even FSU and Clemson have been linked to the B12. But you can pretend if you want to.

IF 2 schools leave the ACC it's likely more leave as well. B1G will take some for sure.

The ACC is likely going to lose 6+ teams so yes I can see how Stanford and Cal could end up having to choose between the gutted ACC and PAC. In the end if the ACC does not have FSU, Clemson, UNC, Virginia, Miami, etc then the PAC is probably the better choice for Stanford and Cal.

The B12 contract is about half the B1G/SEC deals. That's a fact. LOL back at you son.

The reality is Memphis could get an ACC invite before UConn due to their FB program having more value. That will be a hard one to swallow for UConn fans Much like when Cinci made the jump. Yes I think the ACC will look at Temple and Memphis if it's down to BC, Cuse, Wake, Pitt, etc.

No, I think there will end up being a P-4 or P-5. Just a matter of the ACC and PAC deciding to be coastal conferences of about 12 +/- teams each or more of a 24 team nationwide conference.

The B12 is not grandfathered in. They are that valuable on TV which has them in #4 currently but will likely move to #3 shortly.

Not condescending at all, it's realistic. You may perceive it that way due to being insecure about UConn which is common here. The B12 has already been valued by TV partners, no lag. We know the B12 schools are worth about 30 on TV. UConn worth about 6 for BB and 500k for FB. We know that.

ESPN told the B12 not to add UConn due to ACC teams being available soon. And FOX never supported it due to having UConn for pennies already. Sucks as I really think UConn was close to getting the votes and I wanted to see it happen.

So UConn has 2 real options.


1. Stay in Big East making 6 million on BB and try to figure out what to do with FB. Indy seems less likely as there are hardly any left due to not being practical for anyone but ND. MAC might be an option. FCS is an option.

2. Try to jump to the ACC when they lose teams and reload. Seems risky for BB but would save FB and get UConn in the "power" conference albeit more of a Big East type situation as the conference would be Cuse, BC, UConn, Pitt, Wake, Memphis, USF, etc type teams for the most part with possibly Louisville, VTech, GaTech, NCST, Miami.

The reason you didn't respond is because you don't' like the answer. Neither of those are ideal for UConn, Neither provide much income for the AD who desperately needs $. The ACC deal would be better for exposure for sure IMO. So you get angry and do the usual insecure fan response. Getting mad at me won't change anything.


The hilarious part about this is if UConn had been added to the B12 you would be talking about how great it was. Insecure fans are so funny.
 
B12: Just remember Memphis is an academically weak university. UConn is solid and improving. That may play a role for the ACC, maybe not for the B12,
 
.-.
B12 said:
Yes it appears the ACC is going to lose schools, and likely some of those end up in the B12. That's widely known as even FSU and Clemson have been linked to the B12. But you can pretend if you want to.

IF 2 schools leave the ACC it's likely more leave as well. B1G will take some for sure.

The ACC is likely going to lose 6+ teams so yes I can see how Stanford and Cal could end up having to choose between the gutted ACC and PAC. In the end if the ACC does not have FSU, Clemson, UNC, Virginia, Miami, etc then the PAC is probably the better choice for Stanford and Cal.

The B12 contract is about half the B1G/SEC deals. That's a fact. LOL back at you son.

The reality is Memphis could get an ACC invite before UConn due to their FB program having more value. That will be a hard one to swallow for UConn fans Much like when Cinci made the jump. Yes I think the ACC will look at Temple and Memphis if it's down to BC, Cuse, Wake, Pitt, etc.

No, I think there will end up being a P-4 or P-5. Just a matter of the ACC and PAC deciding to be coastal conferences of about 12 +/- teams each or more of a 24 team nationwide conference.

The B12 is not grandfathered in. They are that valuable on TV which has them in #4 currently but will likely move to #3 shortly.

Not condescending at all, it's realistic. You may perceive it that way due to being insecure about UConn which is common here. The B12 has already been valued by TV partners, no lag. We know the B12 schools are worth about 30 on TV. UConn worth about 6 for BB and 500k for FB. We know that.

ESPN told the B12 not to add UConn due to ACC teams being available soon. And FOX never supported it due to having UConn for pennies already. Sucks as I really think UConn was close to getting the votes and I wanted to see it happen.

So UConn has 2 real options.


1. Stay in Big East making 6 million on BB and try to figure out what to do with FB. Indy seems less likely as there are hardly any left due to not being practical for anyone but ND. MAC might be an option. FCS is an option.

2. Try to jump to the ACC when they lose teams and reload. Seems risky for BB but would save FB and get UConn in the "power" conference albeit more of a Big East type situation as the conference would be Cuse, BC, UConn, Pitt, Wake, Memphis, USF, etc type teams for the most part with possibly Louisville, VTech, GaTech, NCST, Miami.

The reason you didn't respond is because you don't' like the answer. Neither of those are ideal for UConn, Neither provide much income for the AD who desperately needs $. The ACC deal would be better for exposure for sure IMO. So you get angry and do the usual insecure fan response. Getting mad at me won't change anything.


The hilarious part about this is if UConn had been added to the B12 you would be talking about how great it was. Insecure fans are so funny.
Expand ...
You are living in a dream world your contract comes up long before the ACC.
You also don't make as much money, and lost your 2 best teams to the SEC.
The Big12 will be picked apart at your new contract in 2031, if not before.
 
I wonder why Tulane isn't on the list of possible schools that go to the PAC-12? If Memphis is on this list, Tulane isn't too far east.

Or is Tulane banking on getting into the ACC when it implodes?
 
www.extrapointsmb.com

What I'm hearing about Pac-12 expansion, the MWC, and everybody else:

No, Cal and Stanford aren't coming. Everything else? Still up for grabs.
www.extrapointsmb.com www.extrapointsmb.com

From the article......

To answer my own question above, this article says Tulane is a target of the PAC-12 (along with Memphis, Rice, and UTSA). A solid point is made that if other MW schools weren't already invited to join the PAC-12, they likely won't be any time soon.

Mountain West is targeting Conference USA ---- New Mexico State and UTEP.

AAC is targeting Air Force to join Army and Navy. (I'm assuming Air Force would need to be all sports rather than football only like Army and Navy).
 
After this all shakes out, how about us football only in the American with the service academies and the leftovers? Wouldn't be terrible.
 
B12 said:
Yes it appears the ACC is going to lose schools, and likely some of those end up in the B12. That's widely known as even FSU and Clemson have been linked to the B12. But you can pretend if you want to.

IF 2 schools leave the ACC it's likely more leave as well. B1G will take some for sure.

The ACC is likely going to lose 6+ teams so yes I can see how Stanford and Cal could end up having to choose between the gutted ACC and PAC. In the end if the ACC does not have FSU, Clemson, UNC, Virginia, Miami, etc then the PAC is probably the better choice for Stanford and Cal.

The B12 contract is about half the B1G/SEC deals. That's a fact. LOL back at you son.

The reality is Memphis could get an ACC invite before UConn due to their FB program having more value. That will be a hard one to swallow for UConn fans Much like when Cinci made the jump. Yes I think the ACC will look at Temple and Memphis if it's down to BC, Cuse, Wake, Pitt, etc.

No, I think there will end up being a P-4 or P-5. Just a matter of the ACC and PAC deciding to be coastal conferences of about 12 +/- teams each or more of a 24 team nationwide conference.

The B12 is not grandfathered in. They are that valuable on TV which has them in #4 currently but will likely move to #3 shortly.

Not condescending at all, it's realistic. You may perceive it that way due to being insecure about UConn which is common here. The B12 has already been valued by TV partners, no lag. We know the B12 schools are worth about 30 on TV. UConn worth about 6 for BB and 500k for FB. We know that.

ESPN told the B12 not to add UConn due to ACC teams being available soon. And FOX never supported it due to having UConn for pennies already. Sucks as I really think UConn was close to getting the votes and I wanted to see it happen.

So UConn has 2 real options.


1. Stay in Big East making 6 million on BB and try to figure out what to do with FB. Indy seems less likely as there are hardly any left due to not being practical for anyone but ND. MAC might be an option. FCS is an option.

2. Try to jump to the ACC when they lose teams and reload. Seems risky for BB but would save FB and get UConn in the "power" conference albeit more of a Big East type situation as the conference would be Cuse, BC, UConn, Pitt, Wake, Memphis, USF, etc type teams for the most part with possibly Louisville, VTech, GaTech, NCST, Miami.

The reason you didn't respond is because you don't' like the answer. Neither of those are ideal for UConn, Neither provide much income for the AD who desperately needs $. The ACC deal would be better for exposure for sure IMO. So you get angry and do the usual insecure fan response. Getting mad at me won't change anything.


The hilarious part about this is if UConn had been added to the B12 you would be talking about how great it was. Insecure fans are so funny.
Expand ...
I think you need to stop smoking the good stuff. There are so many false info in your post that it is not worth a proper response. If B12 folks are all like you, they really need to get off whatever they are smoking.

There is a reason why B12 paid media consultants while you are just another guy on the Internet thumping your chest about a bunch of schools that are far below UConn and ACC schools sans Louisville academically. Last I check, Yormark and the B12 media consultants aren't beating down your door for your opinion. University presidents do care about academics in addition to football.

Also, the B12 is just a bunch of schools that other 2 don't want. If you have schools that they want, you be picked apart so fast just like everyone else. Even then, I am pretty sure there will be another round of realignment at some point where the big 2 will get rid of all the free loaders in their conferences.
 
Last edited:
.-.
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,381
Messages
4,569,571
Members
10,475
Latest member
Tunwin22


Top Bottom