- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 7,496
- Reaction Score
- 15,676
3-3-5Any input on the kind of D he runs?
4-3 ? Tons of pressure?
3-3-5Any input on the kind of D he runs?
4-3 ? Tons of pressure?
What-the-duck*****3-3-5
Ok is that a good formation in an offensive league like the AAC?
Get more corners out there?
I think WVU ran a similar scheme. I think that scheme helps you get more speed on the field, but I doubt we would ever run that exclusively under Edsall.What-the-duck*****
He ran that scheme pretty exclusively at Villanova. I remember them playing that at least 90% of the plays when they were at Rentschler 2 years ago.Nobody runs one formation all the time. If you face teams that throw all the time you play more nickel. I'm sure he and Edsall will evaluate the talent and run the best scheme to fit the talent.
I think WVU ran a similar scheme. I think that scheme helps you get more speed on the field, but I doubt we would ever run that exclusively under Edsall.
Against us that would not be smart.He ran that scheme pretty exclusively at Villanova. I remember them playing that at least 90% of the plays when they were at Rentschler 2 years ago.
The 3-3-5 is my favorite base defense. Sign me up for this hireVillanova’s ATTACK 3-3-5 defense
If you haven’t read Football Study Hall before, it’s a goldmine of the ins and outs of football strategy. One of their more recent pieces covers the ATTACK method for deploying linebackers.
The base concept of ‘ATTACK’ is putting as many players that can raise hell blitzing behind the 2-or-3-man defensive line on the field as possible. They still need to be able to run and defend the pass, but (as we’ve seen first-hand) most of that responsibility falls to the secondary.
The Playbook: Structuring a Defense
it's such a creative scheme. you know how we always end up with 'tweeners? not quite a LB not quite a safety, not quite a corner not quite a safety, etc.? Well perfect - they fit like a glove in this scheme.You want to get after the QB.....Billy's defense will do that. With everybody running out of the spread, the 3-3-5 base makes sense. Blitzes can come from anywhere in this defense.
the 3-3-5 means your best players will be on the field at all times, end of story. you don't have to bring in a nickel package, you don't need to sub in edge rushers, you don't need to swap LB's - you have your 11 guys and their backups.3-3-5 gets better athletes on the field. Seems to be a trend with these hires. Spread offense, 3-3-5 defense. I like it. Give me playmakers!
3-3-5 gets better athletes on the field. Seems to be a trend with these hires. Spread offense, 3-3-5 defense. I like it. Give me playmakers!
The 3-3-5 allows for that.I would hope he is not committed to one style of defense. The best coaches design their defense to best utilize the personnel on the current roster.
Of course.Do we have any room for Villanova verbals?
Do we have any room for Villanova verbals?
the best part is that while yes, it's a 3-3-5 - you will have a different number in the box on every down. Sometimes it looks like a 4-3, sometimes a 3-4, sometimes a 3-5, sometimes a 5-2, etc.The 3-3-5 allows for that.
I think Carrezola is going to be a terror in this scheme.Thinking Vontae Diggs and EJ Levenberry could be good fits in the scheme.
'Nova even ran a 2-4-5 out of it in certain situations. It disguises coverage and pressure.the best part is that while yes, it's a 3-3-5 - you will have a different number in the box on every down. Sometimes it looks like a 4-3, sometimes a 3-4, sometimes a 3-5, sometimes a 5-2, etc.