As someone who subscribes to all the streaming services and has a Roku I guess I’m fine with that route.
As someone else asked, would ESPN+ content be up for grabs to SNY or locals? I remember watching games on like WB11 as a kid and it was called ESPN+.
POLL WITHIN A POLL:
1) for the glass half empty people (say, led by @whaler11 ); how would a “rabbit out of the hat” result (say, over 10 mil) impact your view of the conference and the future of UConn athletics, if at all?
2) for the glass half full people (say, led by @Dooley ); how would a horrible deal (say, less than 6 mil) impact your view of the conference and the course UConn should chart going forward, if at all?
What are the home and away records vs P5. Since most games are away I think?
No, he was talking about being competitive with P5 teams and you chose a different metric wins against teams with a winning record. Apples and oranges, right?No...the results are the results...I just sifted data further...P5 wins...and the nature of those wins.
10 mil and I’d doff my cap to Mr Aresco and never speak ill of him again.
Would buy UConn time to get some real solutions in place.
From an interest standpoint the league is always going to suck. I’m never going to care about SMU and nationally nobody is ever going to care about the American.
That's why I set up the polls to show voters. You are spot on. This poll is a consumer (fan) confidence indicator, not an indicator of the deal.POLL WITHIN A POLL:
1) for the glass half empty people (say, led by @whaler11 ); how would a “rabbit out of the hat” result (say, over 10 mil) impact your view of the conference and the future of UConn athletics, if at all?
2) for the glass half full people (say, led by @Dooley ); how would a horrible deal (say, less than 6 mil) impact your view of the conference and the course UConn should chart going forward, if at all?
What would you envision those real solutions to be?Would buy UConn time to get some real solutions in place.
That’s fair. Follow up question; what is the number that Areseco has to reach in order for you to think this deal is ok?
I wonder if a grant-of-rights was signed - could explain why Memphis president and Aresco are so happy (from December): American Athletic considers grant-of-rights for schools to sweeten next media rights deal
id be pretty impressed if they get 8
Same, I just have a hard time seeing how they get more than six. As fun as the UCF/Memphis/USF/Houston football successes have been - nobody watches them.
ESPN themselves is partially to blame for that. If they're paying more, hopefully their coverage changes tooSame, I just have a hard time seeing how they get more than six. As fun as the UCF/Memphis/USF/Houston football successes have been - nobody watches them.
The PAC is a dead conference walking. I love PAC after dark but their viewership numbers are brutal“Nobody watches them” I think is a little unfair. The AAC championship game has gotten higher TV ratings than the PAC’s.
$10mm - extremely impressedPOLL WITHIN A POLL:
1) for the glass half empty people (say, led by @whaler11 ); how would a “rabbit out of the hat” result (say, over 10 mil) impact your view of the conference and the future of UConn athletics, if at all?
2) for the glass half full people (say, led by @Dooley ); how would a horrible deal (say, less than 6 mil) impact your view of the conference and the course UConn should chart going forward, if at all?
Same, I just have a hard time seeing how they get more than six. As fun as the UCF/Memphis/USF/Houston football successes have been - nobody watches them.
+ <$5.1mm - fire Aresco$10mm - extremely impressed
$8-9mm - good, not great.
$6-7mm - about what I expect
<$5.1mm - shut down football
At that point I don't even care because we shouldn't stay in the conference+ <$5.1mm - fire Aresco