Phil
Stats Geek
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2011
- Messages
- 4,830
- Reaction Score
- 7,600
Also note:
Jan 16: Tenn 67 Miss St 63
Jan 19: Tx A&M 73 Miss St 35
Exactly. I watched the first game, and wondered if I was underestimating Miss St. Guess not.
Also note:
Jan 16: Tenn 67 Miss St 63
Jan 19: Tx A&M 73 Miss St 35
I disagree that the Tennessee zone was the cause of ND's offensive woes in the first half. It was the Irish running up the court like their pants were on fire and driving into the paint willy-willy, sometimes into three defenders, that caused their problems. No patience, no tempo, just a streetball game. It was uncharacteristic of ND and even Pam Ward saw that the Irish needed to slow down and run some offense.
And while ND definitely played better in the second half both offensively and defensively, the LVs went into some sort of funk all by themselves starting at the end of the first half. They heaved up the craziest shots, most of which had no prayer of going in. The LV "offense" in the first half looked better because their one-on-one shots went in (yes, I saw the nice pass by Simmons. I almost fell off the couch when I saw Tennessee actually get an assist) but, really, they don't play offense. Honestly, it looked like an AAU game and that's just sad for a program with Tennessee's pedigree.
14 assists on 19 hoopsDidn't Tennessee have a ton of assists in the first half?
I remember the announcers saying that.
Do be respectful, meyers, you know that there are a number of BY posters who have tenn or vol in their names and don't necessarily share your views. Frankly, I myself prefer Hebrew Nationals.What in the world is the matter with 27% of you people? TN? Really? That's disgusting.
Would love to see an undefeated UConn pummel an undefeated ND like a killer whale tenderizing a seal meal.
Can't respect anyone who would want TN to win. I suppose they would cheer for Hitler and Idi Amin too.Do be respectful, meyers, you know that there are a number of BY posters who have tenn or vol in their names and don't necessarily share your views. Frankly, I myself prefer Hebrew Nationals.
Simmons was named POG and her coach said she played a "magnificent" game and she had 7 turnovers! Simmons can be a streaky shooter but she kills offense; in her 4th year still undisciplined ball hog and her coach is good with it.
A crashing tsunami wave is more disciplined than Simmons. Unfortunately she is that most dreaded of players, the frenetic type that can take an opponent by surprise and score a bunch of points very quickly, but once they adjust and she tires you get nothing but diva dingers off the backboard that often turn into baskets at the other end, and it's hard to sit her because of that early burst of fiery success.Agree. She is so streaky and very hard to determine if she will be a positive or negative player on the floor. When ND started to make their run, Simmons was a disaster. I would have put in Carter. I thought she gave them some real good energy and love the way she plays. Much more disciplined then Simmons.
A crashing tsunami wave is more disciplined than Simmons. Unfortunately she is that most dreaded of players, the frenetic type that can take an opponent by surprise and score a bunch of points very quickly, but once they adjust and she tires you get nothing but diva dingers off the backboard that often turn into baskets at the other end, and it's hard to sit her because of that early burst of fiery success.

Can't respect anyone who would want TN to win. I suppose they would cheer for Hitler and Idi Amin too.
I made a point of watching Russell. She cannot get up and down the court. UConn would run her into next month.
Even in jest, I think this is too far.

That's always nice.also nice to see Niele Ivey![]()
I could have gone with Satan and Bieber.Even in jest, I think this is too far.

We know that the denizens of the Summitt don't. She was to be the latest savior. They really believe in magic over there.She is a freshman and a post. we all know that it takes a year, maybe more for posts to develop to the level of college play. Unfortunately for Mercedes, she picked Tennessee who appears to not develop players, they just throw them into games to use their talent to get the job done. We rarely see any development or expansion of their game, and that also includes conditioning. I feel bad for her...
And it looks like over on Volnation they want the coach to make UTenn play a more uptempo game. At least that's what I think they mean by the "Time for holly to go" post.
I also think Holly needs to unloose Simmons and give her free rein to strike terror into the Vol opponents.

We know that the denizens of the Summitt don't. She was to be the latest savior. They really believe in magic over there.
Far be it for me to ever defend Tennessee, but even I can acknowledge that Izzy Harrison has turned into a terrific post player. Or at least I should say she puts up terrific numbers as I've not watched a Tennessee game yet this year. But she certainly was not a highly rated recruit coming out of HS - more Stef Dolson like. Maybe even lower than Stef. Having said that, I don't disagree that players who go through that program generally don't see the improvements that they do at other programs. Cierra Burdick - perfect example. Top 5 kid - about equivalent to Tuck. But they can't seem to figure out if they want her to be a forward or wing. And she's a non factor in most games.She is a freshman and a post. we all know that it takes a year, maybe more for posts to develop to the level of college play. Unfortunately for Mercedes, she picked Tennessee who appears to not develop players, they just throw them into games to use their talent to get the job done. We rarely see any development or expansion of their game, and that also includes conditioning. I feel bad for her...
One thing I didn't see mentioned after UCONN played RU is that RU put up 64 points on UCONN - the most by any team not named Oregon this season. More than Duke, more than Baylor. I
I am not sure Pat is capable of such reflections.
I like watching the new Rutgers better than the old one, but clearly there's some issues when you team gives up 90+ points at home for the first time in three decades. Substituting a nice uptick on offense for a big deficit on defense is problematic. On the good side, maybe with a young team the defensive toughness can be taught while preserving most of the more high-powered offense.I guarantee that RU fans know this, they were discussing it in the stands after the game.
Frankly, I was in the camp of those expecting that this would be C. Viv's swan song year, but I'm reassessing my thoughts. She is doing a better job of designing a game plan to match the available talent than I had expected. I had pegged her as a "I have a vision on how the game should be played, and you will attempt to execute that plan, whether you have the skills to do so or not". I think that assessment was wrong. Despite a 30 point margin, the team played well.
I didn't see the Memphis game, so maybe I'm jumping to the wrong conclusion based upon a single observation, but this team has potential.