NCAA tourny thread | Page 15 | The Boneyard

NCAA tourny thread

What advanced analytics did you use?

KenPom had it as a 12 point game.
We had it weighted towards momentum, average point differential. I’m up for the tournament using the same formula thus far but this game will wipe out my winnings.
 
Your buddy should have bet on UCF instead. They are an elite defensive team and they’ve got 2 guards who can create their own shot when they need to. Unfortunately Zion is a really bad matchup for Taco. His instincts are way too slow, but who knows maybe the height will bother Zion.
 
We had it weighted towards momentum, average point differential. I’m up for the tournament using the same formula thus far but this game will wipe out my winnings.

Saint Louis is probably the worst shooting team in the tournament and VTech plays a zone, so... There's always the backdoor cover.

I don't recommend momentum. It has not been shown to be highly correlated to success.
 
Gotta bet $ amounts that make you nervous. Good for him. Or not. Either way, sounds like a good time
 
I had Carolina -16.5 in the second half and I’ve never seen anything quite like that. They turned an easy win into a ridiculous sweat.
 
I had Carolina -16.5 in the second half and I’ve never seen anything quite like that. They turned an easy win into a ridiculous sweat.

Speaking of sweat, could really use a good last 7 minutes from Iowa State here.
 
Kid was unreal. I'm 47 and remember watching the tourney when I was a kid. Some of the 16 seeds could barely get the ball over half court at times and were so overmatched in every way. Nowadays it's so different. These 16 seeds can play and they seem to get better every year.
Because almost ALL the players now have excellent athleticism.
 
UCF is choking this away. Still up 7 with 5 mins to go, but lead used to be 3x that.
 

Online statistics

Members online
269
Guests online
3,038
Total visitors
3,307

Forum statistics

Threads
164,193
Messages
4,386,756
Members
10,196
Latest member
ArtTheFan


.
..
Top Bottom