NCAA: Committee on Infractions could not conclude UNC violated NCAA rules | Page 2 | The Boneyard

NCAA: Committee on Infractions could not conclude UNC violated NCAA rules

Can't wait to see those student-athlete ads they always run during the tournament.
 
Wait wait wait, this literally makes no sense.

Doesn't the players GPA contribute to the APR? If the students were taking fraudulent classes that boosted their GPA, doesn't that mean they are reporting a fraudulent APR?

And what's worse, a low APR or a fake APR?

Am I missing something here?

What an absolute load of horse****. Actually.
 
Too everyone moaning about UConn's penalty in comparison. Too bad no one cares.
 
So, does anyone else wonder why North Carolina was so insistent that the NCAA not release a report that would be entirely vindicate them right before a fundraising event? One has to wonder what happened over the last week.
 
Last edited:
.-.
I am actually speechless to find the correct swear words which depict the proper outrage. The NCAA finds violations in ridiculous things like Geno setting up an ESPN Tour for Maya Moore, that was frequently offered to the public, and turns around and blesses sham courses to keep athletes eligible, where being a student athlete is supposedly the core of the NCAA's self righteous purity. And in the same breath, the head of this swamp has the balls to organize a commission..... Begs the question why North Carolina would not have wanted this release last week. Clearly the NCAA wanted to get their commission established before the release so they could pretend ....

Like a famous women often said;

NEVERMIND
 
Un. Believable.

I mean not really.

It makes me so angry. Why didn't we think to just use fake classes? It's tempting to want to sue the NCAA into the ground, but we know how that went last time.
 
UConnStats said:
This proves without a shadow of any doubt that UConn was punished incredibly excessively for their APR.

This is offensive to all the students who bust their asses to get good grades at UNC too.

The overall lack of integrity shown by the NCAA here is just another embarrassment. Maybe they should have let the FBI handle this one, too.
Expand ...
We’ve all known for a long time that the NCAA is a selective disciplinary group, nice to see the FBI kick some ass, hopefully they can continue so all of the fraud comes to a stop.
 
.-.
I feel like boycotting all NCAA events, but I don't want to punish myself by not watching the UCONN men and women basketball.

This non-action by the ncaa is not good for the future of college sports. but they don't care, they get their money now.
 
Jimdish255 said:
So all those players who the University knew and funnelled into taking fake classes are considered eligible by the NCAA just because they padded the classes with a few non-athletes? Emmert's arrogance and greed knows no bounds of ethics.
Expand ...
Go back and reread that post now. You saw only the first paragraph. We're in agreement.
 
posted in the other thread, but this one is getting more traction...

Shorter NCAA:
"We'd rather see UNC make fake classes available to their entire student population, than see UConn have student-athletes do poorly in real classes."

Kudos to the professors at UConn for having academic standards, and to the coaches and athletic department for making the necessary changes to see that our athletes have the support needed to perform in the classroom.

The NCAA is a joke.
 
The APR angle is a good one.

Email to NCAA: Hello, we need new direction on filing APR scores. Are fake numbers now permissable?

Response: You will get the death penalty for knowingly submitting fake APR scores.

Email to NCAA: Sorry, I should have been clearer. What I meant is, can our professors issue fake grades which are then calculated into a fake APR score?

Response: Only if you don't know the grades are fake.

Email to NCAA: Let me rephrase. If the professor issues fake grades but doesn't tell us they are fake, can we use them?

Response: Only if there are regular kids in the class.

Email to NCAA: And, let's say hypothetically, we are caught using fake grades for the APR, through no fault of our own (only the professor is culpable), can we still use the fake grades in our APR even though we admitted they were fake?

Response: Good question. Let me check with Emmert!!!!!!
 
.-.
As if the hypocrisy of college sports wasn't obvious enough, NCAA sends clear message that the system is rigged and those that most benefit & control this rigged system can simply do whatever the scalfucklito they want.

Definitely in comparison to UConn ridiculous & salt in the wound that in this case they make a point to apply penalties adopted AFTER the violations versus in UConn's cased imposing rules retroactively.
 
upstater said:
The APR angle is a good one.

Email to NCAA: Hello, we need new direction on filing APR scores. Are fake numbers now permissable?

Response: You will get the death penalty for knowingly submitting fake APR scores.

Email to NCAA: Sorry, I should have been clearer. What I meant is, can our professors issue fake grades which are then calculated into a fake APR score?

Response: Only if you don't know the grades are fake.

Email to NCAA: Let me rephrase. If the professor issues fake grades but doesn't tell us they are fake, can we use them?

Response: Only if there are regular kids in the class.

Email to NCAA: And, let's say hypothetically, we are caught using fake grades for the APR, through no fault of our own (only the professor is culpable), can we still use the fake grades in our APR even though we admitted they were fake?

Response: Good question. Let me check with Emmert!!!!!!
Expand ...
#toobigtofail
 
Ricker said:
I am actually speechless to find the correct swear words which depict the proper outrage. The NCAA finds violations in ridiculous things like Geno setting up an ESPN Tour for Maya Moore, that was frequently offered to the public, and turns around and blesses sham courses to keep athletes eligible, where being a student athlete is supposedly the core of the NCAA's self righteous purity. And in the same breath, the head of this swamp has the balls to organize a commission..... Begs the question why North Carolina would not have wanted this release last week. Clearly the NCAA wanted to get their commission established before the release so they could pretend ....

Like a famous women often said;

NEVERMIND
Expand ...
It's called corruption, they make DC look like a bastion of integrity.
 
look-the-cat-can-drive.jpg

Conspiracy Kitty says: "What the duck____? Oh that's it. Google give me directions to the NCAA headquarters."
 
.-.
Greenburg apparently agrees with NCAA too. What a world we live in today that Greenburg is a major ESPN mens basketball figure. That's how pathetic ESPN college ball coverage has become.
 
I thought that if North Carolina had players that were kept academically eligible by taking completely fake courses, where the players did zero and got A’s, the school would be punished and punished severely. Every one of the players who were in a course should have their grade changed to F, their GPA’s recalculated, and only then should decisions on sanctions and penalties be made. If we find out that players on the National Championship team were involved, then that title must be vacated. Unbelievable.
 
Fishy said:
Utterly amazing.

Don't call it an extra benefit. Call it academic fraud.

They're just so bad at this.
Expand ...
Do you really think that obvious analysis escaped them in favor of a much more tortured, 'well you can commit academic fraud so long as it is a benefit available to every student?'

They aren't bad; they are corrupt.
 
.-.
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,297
Messages
4,561,855
Members
10,457
Latest member
Storytory


Top Bottom