By framing UNCs issue as a "benefits issue" rather than "an ineligible player issue" The NCAA gave itself wiggle room not to punish North Carolina. The unescapable truth is
WE CAREToo everyone moaning about UConn's penalty in comparison. Too bad no one cares.
We’ve all known for a long time that the NCAA is a selective disciplinary group, nice to see the FBI kick some ass, hopefully they can continue so all of the fraud comes to a stop.This proves without a shadow of any doubt that UConn was punished incredibly excessively for their APR.
This is offensive to all the students who bust their asses to get good grades at UNC too.
The overall lack of integrity shown by the NCAA here is just another embarrassment. Maybe they should have let the FBI handle this one, too.
Go back and reread that post now. You saw only the first paragraph. We're in agreement.So all those players who the University knew and funnelled into taking fake classes are considered eligible by the NCAA just because they padded the classes with a few non-athletes? Emmert's arrogance and greed knows no bounds of ethics.
#toobigtofailThe APR angle is a good one.
Email to NCAA: Hello, we need new direction on filing APR scores. Are fake numbers now permissable?
Response: You will get the death penalty for knowingly submitting fake APR scores.
Email to NCAA: Sorry, I should have been clearer. What I meant is, can our professors issue fake grades which are then calculated into a fake APR score?
Response: Only if you don't know the grades are fake.
Email to NCAA: Let me rephrase. If the professor issues fake grades but doesn't tell us they are fake, can we use them?
Response: Only if there are regular kids in the class.
Email to NCAA: And, let's say hypothetically, we are caught using fake grades for the APR, through no fault of our own (only the professor is culpable), can we still use the fake grades in our APR even though we admitted they were fake?
Response: Good question. Let me check with Emmert!!!!!!