None of which has much if any relevance to UNC's no show, no nothing courses, and ongoing related denials. Other than that, hooking up with Andre soon?
When the economy is good - problems get mitigated - you watch.
Wow, you nailed it.
No doubt money makes many ethically vacuous issues go away, apparently even in academia and perhaps even with accreditation boards, e.g., Penn State Sandusky, Paterno, et al, and yet NC's economy was booming before UNC Chapel Hill's decade or so of no morals, no show, no work, no nothing courses were exposed in 2011.
The speed of our public humiliation and punishment was astounding. I' ve watched these things go down after ours and they take forever.
I think it more like the Miami narrative. UNC said we won't accept any punishment and will fight you tooth and nail. As another poster said, it would surprise me if UNC handed them a draft of the complaint that they will file.
Now under normal circumstances the NCAA would stammer, spew out a harrumph or two and move on to monitoring whether bagels have cream cheese or not on them (I kid you not on this. That's an issue to the NCAA.) But in this circumstance with the FBI probe in full swing they can't afford to look ineffectual or complicit.
So our boy Emmert has a problem. Now if he and his organization had integrity, he would move forward according to an established procedure that has had a history of being consistently and fairly applied. But we are talking about this gutless, grinning weasel:
He's more about self preservation than anything else. Frankly, there's no on I'd rather see in a trap of their own making.
When you are as handsome as Harvey Weinstein there is no need for him to force himself on women. They fall at his feet. Sounds consensual to me.
From what I hear he was the one doing the railroading and in some cases, I may be envious!!!
Same booming economy six years later in the Tar Heel state, and still no meeting with Andre. Quite frankly, touche!
