NBA Draft tonight | Page 5 | The Boneyard

NBA Draft tonight

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
5,914
Reaction Score
10,556
that knicks pick was definitely exciting. prozingis was also productive on sevilla, this isn't a darko or a jan vesley situation where he barely played or put up ghastly numbers.

all my buddies who are hornets are pissed, and rightfully so. Cho with a terrible selection when he could have made moves to get mudiay two spots up, or simply taken winslow to help aid a barren backcourt.
 
Joined
Jan 19, 2012
Messages
2,164
Reaction Score
13,058
that knicks pick was definitely exciting. prozingis was also productive on sevilla, this isn't a darko or a jan vesley situation where he barely played or put up ghastly numbers.

all my buddies who are hornets are pissed, and rightfully so. Cho with a terrible selection when he could have made moves to get mudiay two spots up, or simply taken winslow to help aid a barren backcourt.
You don't take Mudiay when you have Kemba
You don't take Justise when you have MKG.
CHA just got Lamb and Batum
They needed 3 point shooting and a good big man, so why not go for both in one player? I liked the pick a lot. The risk is there but he is well polished and can provide immediate impact
 
Joined
Feb 28, 2014
Messages
352
Reaction Score
678
What kind of analysis is that? The guy missed 42 games with an injury and was playing injured in most of the games that he did play. Plus he didn't play any games after the all-star break.


What was their record before he went down? Pretty much the same it was after.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
5,914
Reaction Score
10,556
You don't take Mudiay when you have Kemba
You don't take Justise when you have MKG.
CHA just got Lamb and Batum
They needed 3 point shooting and a good big man, so why not go for both in one player? I liked the pick a lot. The risk is there but he is well polished and can provide immediate impact
provide immediate impact? no he can't, he wont be able to stay on the floor because he can't defend his position. Cho blew the wad when he passed up on BPA. winslow fits fine he might be better than mkg and they only have one shooting guard. wing depth is terrible.
 

Dynasty

Never not member
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
1,773
Reaction Score
4,436
What was their record before he went down? Pretty much the same it was after.

And? Blaming a guy who didn't even play in half of his team's games for the team's record is a bit irresponsible. Especially when the Knicks were tanking the season.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
6,061
Reaction Score
19,134
BUHusky10 said:
I'm still baffled that Charlotte passed on Winslow to take KAMINSKY?! What a joke, MJ is reliving the Adam Morrison saga all over again. In fact he already has a Kaminsky on his roster, his name is Cody Zeller, hell they even have Spencer Hawes too!

Fine with me. Winslow would have eaten into Lambs potential for minutes. Lamb is now more likely to be an option to get floor spacing when MKG is building condos.

I was going to criticize you for saying all white guys are the same, but Zeller and Kaminsky do play an awful lot alike. So it's a fair point.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
5,914
Reaction Score
10,556
a front court rotation of kaminsky, zeller, and jefferson is laughable defensively, and all signs are pointing towards them letting their only effective rebounder/rim protector walk (biyombo).
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
3,617
Reaction Score
12,838
Zeller and Kaminsky do play an awful lot alike.
Kaminksy hangs around the perimeter, Zeller hangs out down low exclusively. On the spectrum of power forwards, they are quite different players.
 
Joined
Apr 25, 2014
Messages
5,290
Reaction Score
19,770
People ripping on the Porzingas pick are missing the boat, I've waited my whole life for the Knicks to be good so I can wait a couple more years. Who would you prefer them to take at #4? Cauley-Stein, Winslow, Mudiay? The way I look at it, Porzingas has way more upside than any of them. It's the first time I've been happy with a Knicks decision in forever.

You're assuming that it's a guarantee that Porzingis reaches his potential. Players like him are rarely safe bets. With a top-4 pick and a team in need of fresh talent, picking a player like Mudiay, who is an elite athlete with PG skills and elite size for his position makes a lot more sense. Mudiay is probably a solid starter on day 1, and has the upside to be an all-star PG. Porzingis is definitely not a starter at this point, and he has to improve a lot more to justify that pick than Mudiay or Winslow would have.
 
Joined
Sep 16, 2011
Messages
50,018
Reaction Score
175,313
You're assuming that it's a guarantee that Porzingis reaches his potential. Players like him are rarely safe bets. With a top-4 pick and a team in need of fresh talent, picking a player like Mudiay, who is an elite athlete with PG skills and elite size for his position makes a lot more sense. Mudiay is probably a solid starter on day 1, and has the upside to be an all-star PG. Porzingis is definitely not a starter at this point, and he has to improve a lot more to justify that pick than Mudiay or Winslow would have.
Disagree, the last thing the Knicks need is a point guard who can't shoot or an undersized 3 man trying to transition into a shooting guard. Potential is a scary word to some but the rewards can be so much better with Prozingas than either Mudiay or Winslow. Guys like Vesely and Tskitisvili seemed like much bigger risks to me, I feel pretty good about Kristaps panning out.
 
Joined
Jan 19, 2012
Messages
2,164
Reaction Score
13,058
provide immediate impact? no he can't, he wont be able to stay on the floor because he can't defend his position. Cho blew the wad when he passed up on BPA. winslow fits fine he might be better than mkg and they only have one shooting guard. wing depth is terrible.
Well justise is a 3, not a 2 for starters. Lamb + batum = 2 SGs. Who the hell is BPA? Winslow will be a small 3 that has poor ball handling skills and an iffy shot. Good luck with him defending the SFs in the NBA. He honestly is just a more athletic Rodney Hood. I don't buy it. You need to be much more than good in transition to be a successful 3 in the NBA.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
4,318
Reaction Score
7,407
Listening to Ainge on the radio this morning, I don't think he has a plan. I don't think there's a major trade in the works.

He's got a reputation in the league as a guy who's going to fleece you (see Minnesota, Brooklyn trades), and now I think GMs are hesitant to deal with him.

I liked the RJ Hunter pick. Great shooter. Should be able to score. Other than that, Danny gets an F for last night.

Rozier might have turned some heads in the workouts, but he's got the same skillset and not nearly as much talent as Marcus Smart, so what's the point? You take him at 16?? Not to mention you already have a 6th man point guard in Isaiah Thomas, who also might be the best player on the team right now.

Mickey might be a good defender, but from what we're hearing he has zero offensive skill. Which is really what you'd expect from an early 2nd-round pick.

The Celtics have a ton of picks, but those picks actually have to pan out and be low numbers for anyone to care. Obviously trying to pair 16, 28, and a player didn't get us anywhere last night. We need lottery picks. Making the playoffs last year ended up killing us.
I didn't hear Ainge this AM, but agree about Celtics not having a plan for this coming year. Given that Winslow slipped, and something like this happens almost every year (to wit Paul Pierce) it turns out to be a HUGE mistake to have made the playoffs:
1. Falling draft order out of top-10
2. Marcus Smart played like crap in the playoffs
3. Olenik sullied his rep (he's awkward not dirty, but still) and
4. Olenik burnt any chance of KLove coming to Boston to the ground.

Don't get Rozier pick at all. Seems like they'd settled on him when they thought they were trading Smart and didn't have anything better to do (maybe they were picking him at 26?).
  • Hunter was a good pick.
  • Mickey who? Shotblocking sounds nice but has there ever been a good basketball player named Mickey!?
  • So glad they didn't take Christmas.
  • Bummed they didn't pick Connaughton for the 'root for a guy who looks like us' factor that made Marty Conlon's Celtic career enjoyable.
  • How did Bootsy Thornton get college eligibility back and get into the draft again out of W&Mary?!
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
3,028
Reaction Score
3,724
I really don't see how Mudiay is some can't miss prospect. He's good, but I think he has pretty similar risk/reward potential as Porzingis does.
 
Joined
May 6, 2015
Messages
1,142
Reaction Score
2,896
Disagree. . . . His recorded barefoot height is actually the same as Hasheem Thabeet's. Think about that. He very well may be listed at 7'3" (which seems appropriate if you see the pictures of the players on stage last night). So Porzingis is a mobile, long, sharp-shooting 7'3" PF who projects as a rim protector down the line. There have been very few players ever with his unique combination of height, length, mobility, and versatile offensive game. And he's 19.
Just watched a lengthy video of the kid. I'm going to go out on a limb and say that he'll be a bust in the NBA. Guy is completely earth bound. I mean, it looks like he doesn't have 12 inches of vertical. At 7/1, he'll be a perimeter threat, but your comparison to Hasheem might be perfect, because this 7/1 guy, listed at 7/3, could well be in the D league pretty quickly. Beyond a very nice stroke and shot, just does not pass the eye test for NBA athleticism/talent.
I am curious, however.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
5,316
Reaction Score
23,569
Just watched a lengthy video of the kid. I'm going to go out on a limb and say that he'll be a bust in the NBA. Guy is completely earth bound. I mean, it looks like he doesn't have 12 inches of vertical. At 7/1, he'll be a perimeter threat, but your comparison to Hasheem might be perfect, because this 7/1 guy, listed at 7/3, could well be in the D league pretty quickly. Beyond a very nice stroke and shot, just does not pass the eye test for NBA athleticism/talent.
I am curious, however.
His vertical was measured at 37" which is pretty impressive for a 7 fter. Had KP played at a college this year he probably would have been a dominant player.
 

pnow15

Previously pnete
Joined
Oct 15, 2014
Messages
4,662
Reaction Score
2,638
As a Knicks fan, the thing I took away from the draft is that Phil Jackson absolutely does not care if he fails here. He already won by convincing Dolan to pay him crazy money to do as he pleases, and he's already got enough of a track record prior to this that his NBA legacy is secure irrespective of how either this pick or his Knick tenure in general turn out.

No one truly has any idea how Porzingis will turn out, and the pick is exactly as he described it: a huge risk with a potentially huge payoff. Personally, I think it's reckless, but it is interesting. Part of me is somewhat impressed that he took such a huge gamble, but upon further reflection about his existing legacy, what he inherited, and what he's being paid, I see it moreso as a "Hey, WTF, why not go for it?" move. Historically, these moves have not paid off for the Knicks, but to some degree that does make it slightly more impressive that he was willing to make a decision that has strong potential to be another in a long line of colossal failures for the franchise.

A list of 6'5'' or taller players who could penetrate into the lane pass and or/and make shots in big games. Oscar Robinson(1 title?) Magic(5 titles), Michael (6 titles), Kobe(5 titles) Manu(4 titles) Havilchek(10 titles?)

A list of 7'3'' three point jump shooters as primary or secondary stars on their teams who have won NBA titles:
there is a... and there is .... aaaa and then of course how could I leave out.... aaaaa.
 

pnow15

Previously pnete
Joined
Oct 15, 2014
Messages
4,662
Reaction Score
2,638
As a Knicks fan, the thing I took away from the draft is that Phil Jackson absolutely does not care if he fails here. He already won by convincing Dolan to pay him crazy money to do as he pleases, and he's already got enough of a track record prior to this that his NBA legacy is secure irrespective of how either this pick or his Knick tenure in general turn out.

No one truly has any idea how Porzingis will turn out, and the pick is exactly as he described it: a huge risk with a potentially huge payoff. Personally, I think it's reckless, but it is interesting. Part of me is somewhat impressed that he took such a huge gamble, but upon further reflection about his existing legacy, what he inherited, and what he's being paid, I see it moreso as a "Hey, WTF, why not go for it?" move. Historically, these moves have not paid off for the Knicks, but to some degree that does make it slightly more impressive that he was willing to make a decision that has strong potential to be another in a long line of colossal failures for the franchise.

A list of 6'5'' or taller players who could penetrate into the lane pass and or/and make shots in big games. Oscar Robinson(1 title?) Magic(5 titles), Michael (6 titles), Kobe(5 titles) Manu(4 titles) Havilchek(10 titles?)Lebron James(2 titles).

A list of 7'3'' three point jump shooters as primary or secondary stars on their teams who have won NBA titles:
there is a... and there is .... aaaa and then of course how could I leave out.... aaaaa.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
6,928
Reaction Score
17,382
I thought the pick was fine. Like another poster I heard Larry Brown too and he said what the poster mentioned. The guy was pretty much a consensus top 5 pick so I while I understand those that don't like the pick have valid reasons, but to get like Stephen A Smith was and some of the callers I heard on WFAN with total hate for the pick, I think it's over-the-top.
 

gtcam

Diehard since '65
Joined
Sep 12, 2012
Messages
11,155
Reaction Score
29,505
favorite picks

mudiay to the nugs ( my pick for ROY, he will be the face of the franchise soon)

winslow to the heat

tyus jones to the wolves via cleveland. just wow on that one, clearly an A+ draft for minny.
Yeah the jones to Minni was/is a neat thing BUT is there enough ball for him and Rubio?
 

FfldCntyFan

Texas: Property of UConn Men's Basketball program
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
13,070
Reaction Score
46,454
A list of 6'5'' or taller players who could penetrate into the lane pass and or/and make shots in big games. Oscar Robinson(1 title?) Magic(5 titles), Michael (6 titles), Kobe(5 titles) Manu(4 titles) Havilchek(10 titles?)

A list of 7'3'' three point jump shooters as primary or secondary stars on their teams who have won NBA titles:
there is a... and there is .... aaaa and then of course how could I leave out.... aaaaa.
How many 7'3" players have there been (regardless of whether they could or could not make a three)? The tallest to date that can be considered an exceptional player at the NBA level was Jabbar (Alcindor) who was 7'2". Players 7'3" or taller (Burleson, Nevitt, Eaton, Bol, Muresan and Bradley were all very limited; if you want to include Thabeet, Closs and Breuer, each was really a bit under 7'3", that is three more at this level) normally can't do much. Sabonis was never healthy in the NBA, Yao got hurt too early, Smits and Ilgauskas were nice players but not exceptional and Sampson had potential but injuries turned him from a potential star into a journeyman.

I would have preferred Mudiay but he is far from a sure thing. I also hope you aren't viewing him as a 6'5" guy who can penetrate and score. The one big question mark on him is his ability to score and I can think of a ton of potential big time guards who came into the NBA and had difficulty penetrating against that level of competition. I'm not saying he won't learn how, just that this is similar to thinking a kid can pass block at LT prior to ever seeing him block an NFL DE.

I also imagine that you've never seen Havlicek play. As great of a player (and yes he was great) as Hondo was, penetrating was not really part of his game. Great passer and ballhandler (especially for a forward), unbelievable basketball IQ, deadly midrange shooter who got better (and his range increased dramatically) in big spots, quality defender and exceptional leader but when he scored close to the basket it was either being out on front of the pack or off a pass he received after a cut to shake his defender.
 

Dynasty

Never not member
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
1,773
Reaction Score
4,436
A list of 6'5'' or taller players who could penetrate into the lane pass and or/and make shots in big games. Oscar Robinson(1 title?) Magic(5 titles), Michael (6 titles), Kobe(5 titles) Manu(4 titles) Havilchek(10 titles?)

A list of 7'3'' three point jump shooters as primary or secondary stars on their teams who have won NBA titles:
there is a... and there is .... aaaa and then of course how could I leave out.... aaaaa.

You basically just isolated Porzingis in one group that was certain to not include any others, while giving guys like Mudiay extreme leeway. Not exactly fair.
 
Joined
May 6, 2015
Messages
1,142
Reaction Score
2,896
His vertical was measured at 37" which is pretty impressive for a 7 fter. Had KP played at a college this year he probably would have been a dominant player.
WOW. He sure doesn't play like he hsas a 3 foot vertical. NEED TO ..s..ee it to believe it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
372
Guests online
2,464
Total visitors
2,836

Forum statistics

Threads
159,074
Messages
4,179,384
Members
10,050
Latest member
MTSuitsky


.
Top Bottom