Naming Rights to the Rent? | Page 5 | The Boneyard

Naming Rights to the Rent?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
3,121
Reaction Score
2,837
Waste Management Stadium... Any more seasons might be used as a toxic waste dump....
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
3,370
Reaction Score
4,422
Husky25 said:
Can you provide a little more info?
No hard evidence. Guys at the FD here during Pratt's heyday say trucks used to go dump 55 gal drums in the woods all the time... Like every night. I think though it was the parcel closer to Brewer street. The swampy area over there.
 

Chin Diesel

Power of Love
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
32,621
Reaction Score
98,851
No hard evidence. Guys at the FD here during Pratt's heyday say trucks used to go dump 55 gal drums in the woods all the time... Like every night. I think though it was the parcel closer to Brewer street. The swampy area over there.

Up until about 25-30 years ago 55 gallons per day would have been chump change for an industrial site with direct access to a swamp or Marsh.
 

Husky25

Dink & Dunk beat the Greatest Show on Turf.
Joined
Sep 10, 2012
Messages
18,518
Reaction Score
19,505
No hard evidence. Guys at the FD here during Pratt's heyday say trucks used to go dump 55 gal drums in the woods all the time... Like every night. I think though it was the parcel closer to Brewer street. The swampy area over there.
Up until about 25-30 years ago 55 gallons per day would have been chump change for an industrial site with direct access to a swamp or Marsh.
There is a difference between hazardous waste and toxic waste. I doubt very highly that the ground soil tests came back totally negative and pristine. However, if there was unmitigated toxic waste at the Rentschler site, the stadium would not have been built there. To indicate that the stadium is built on a toxic waste dump is disingenuous at best.
 

Waquoit

Mr. Positive
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
32,452
Reaction Score
83,445
Up until about 25-30 years ago 55 gallons per day would have been chump change for an industrial site with direct access to a swamp or Marsh.
That's funny you bring that up. A few decades ago, the townsfolk were up in arms. They thought the stream going past the property was radioactive because it was glowing bright green. Turns out it was just florescent penetrant that Pratt dumped.
 

Waquoit

Mr. Positive
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
32,452
Reaction Score
83,445
There is a difference between hazardous waste and toxic waste.

I'm sure some here remember the original plan for Cabela's. It was supposed to be in a different spot and included a fishing pond. That all changed after the tests. Look, I don't know the threshold between hazardous and toxic, but I'm sure that if the soil was pristine, UTC doesn't donate the land.
 

mets1090

Probably returning some video tapes...
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
3,642
Reaction Score
3,476
I'll be close to retirement age by the time P&W rights expire
Me too, assuming my plans of winnings the lottery come to fruition.
 

SonsOfNutmeg

#TheCut #HuskyRevolution
Joined
Aug 22, 2013
Messages
1,369
Reaction Score
2,022
They need publicity like, "UConn wins opener", "UConn outflanks Army", "UConn sinks Navy", "The fur flies as the Huskies and Tigers collide". "UConn's winning streak continues with a stunner over BYU", "Huskies claw #15 Cincinnati 29-17"
+ 1,000,000!
 

SonsOfNutmeg

#TheCut #HuskyRevolution
Joined
Aug 22, 2013
Messages
1,369
Reaction Score
2,022
Sorry, but I could not possibly disagree more. This bit of news is probably the single biggest and most interesting bit of news to be announced by UConn for its football program since Pasqualoni was finally canned. The added parking acreage that could, potentially, provide room for an additional 10,000 fans points in the direction that UConn still believes in itself, its football program, and its chances at getting into a power conference. There is no need to expand the stadium while still playing in the AAC. The only reason to expand the stadium is if UConn gets into a power conference. The added land provided by UTC will now allow for the stadium to be expanded up to 50-55K.
Have you seen the "artwork" they're proposing though? Missed the mark, and a missed opportunity IMO. It could change though, so I'll give you that... Also, don't get me wrong I'm all for expansion and possibly getting into a P5 conference.
 

SonsOfNutmeg

#TheCut #HuskyRevolution
Joined
Aug 22, 2013
Messages
1,369
Reaction Score
2,022
At the very least, it is easier to tell Jim Delany and B1G leaders that we can expand the stadium by 10-15,000 seats when we now have the land needed to accompany the parking traffic (to go with the pre-constructed footings already put in place at the stadium itself to handle an expansion). This is exciting news indeed.
Anyone know exactly where these footing are, or how they would add onto the current Rent? Maybe another deck above the non-tower side/UConn sideline?
 

SonsOfNutmeg

#TheCut #HuskyRevolution
Joined
Aug 22, 2013
Messages
1,369
Reaction Score
2,022
Really bored on this bye week, and took to re-designing the P&W Stadium logo (because I think the current one kinda blows for a stadium and that thrown together facade of stadium sells the facility, UConn and the state short IMO...), also did a mock-up with the front of the stadium. Check it out...

Rent Front copy.jpg
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
1,348
Reaction Score
3,876
Good but the logo on the left is the UTC logo. The PW logo is the one with the eagle. Oh, and you're missing the B1G logo on the right.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
586
Guests online
4,728
Total visitors
5,314

Forum statistics

Threads
156,999
Messages
4,076,263
Members
9,965
Latest member
deltaop99


Top Bottom