- Joined
- Nov 4, 2018
- Messages
- 2,005
- Reaction Score
- 13,372
Unfortunately, if you think about it, this "interpretation" is easy to arrive at if you want to get there.
Geno, like just about all D1 coaches was chatting up the ref about things he felt the ref needs to pay attention to or maybe that they missed (in order to, as a minimum, not lose an on court advantage due to officiating "misses") At that point in time it is easy to believe that Geno might have been talking about the chippy play by a star player on the ND team that has potential to cause harm to his players. Arike, hearing Geno complain about her to the officials, combined with the building frustration of the impending loss and her inability to turn that around, exploded at Geno. So you see, if you lay it out that way, by railing to the official about Arike's rough play right in front of her while she's in the midst of losing the game, Geno can easily be interpreted by her as "baited" her.
Now that interpretation would be incorrect but it provides a nice explanation to bridge and cover her unacceptable behavior and push the primary blame to someone else.
So it's not hard to understand, but it doesn't make it correct in any way.
Agreed, it's not hard to understand. Particularly if this is the conclusion that you want to arrive at. I think your description of the likely events is exactly correct. Not hard to understand the "baiting" story, but difficult to believe if one looks at the situation objectively.