More future schedule dates/opponents for 2021/2022 | Page 3 | The Boneyard

More future schedule dates/opponents for 2021/2022

Status
Not open for further replies.
USC has come to play BC and Syracuse in the past decade
IIRC, USCw gave an ex-Trojans’ asst AD a favor after he was hired as citrus AD. Gross? Pretty sure he was pushed out or fired due to NCAA investigations related to sorryexcuse employees doing course work for Fab Melo and other nose picker players.

Opportunities to enhance northeast alumni relations and maybe regular student recruiting also likely influenced USCw to schedule the fruit as well as bcu. Similar considerations may eventually with UConn.

If not USCw, perhaps games with Pac12 schools with many northeast alumni, current students, or to aid student recruiting, e.g., possibly Arizona and ASU. Weekend gridiron and hoop doubleheader with Arizona?
 
That AAC basketball would never had worked. Full stop

The AAC Football is getting really really good. I agree. But it’s not just that we suck ... 4 or more games a year, we simply don’t care. It is regional. College Football isn’t merely a Ken Pom or whatever. It’s Rivals. And push Syracuse in ... and they’re worth 5 Tulane or SMU or Tulsa
 
You brought a lot of baggage to this post. Where did I talk about you getting "pumped for more local flair"?

I do think local games make sense....and I think long term there will be more and more on the schedule. But DB had a short time to cobble together a schedule for the next couple years. Considering the short time frame and limited options, I think it is pretty good. And yes....I think it is more interesting to play Fresno State than Tulsa and I do think an independent schedule is more interesting than the AAC schedule. But....I don't know if it will work financially. Time will tell.

I encourage you to accept change and look at the possibilities instead of yearning for the past.
I didn't say 'you' specifically... There are more than enough posts and threads on this board to support the notion that many folks on here want to see uconn play the likes of umass, and every other FBS school within a 4 hour drive...

I want uconn playing games that gets them in the national conversation (on a positive level)... That's not happening if you're not playing teams that can elevate the program and get national attention. The AAC offered Uconn that opportunity... Like every conference, there are top tier programs, middling, and bottom dwellers. Uconn was an absolute bottome dweller. Had they been competitive with UCF, Houston, Memphis, or even Temple, Uconn had an opportunity to make a FB name for itself.

unfortunately, that didn't happen. so now we're supposed to get excited playing Fresno State in a game that has zero relevance to anything? The important piece you're missing is that bowl games do offer interesting match-ups FOR SCHOOLS THAT HAVE HAD SUCCESSFUL SEASONS... Bowl games between 1-11 Uconn and 1-11 Umass don't exist for obvious reasons.

Ultimately, winning is the cure. Win games, you get to play in more meaningful games. play in meaningful games, you get national attention, recruits see you, fans want to watch. It's a simple formula where uconn is struggling with the first step. Just Win!
 
UConn press release


I always thought this save on travel explanation was BS for leaving the AAC. Here is further evidence. If anything, in football we may log more miles when you factor in Rocky Mountain, west coast and SEC body bag game trips.
 
.-.
I always thought this save on travel explanation was BS for leaving the AAC. Here is further evidence. If anything, in football we may log more miles when you factor in Rocky Mountain, west coast and SEC body bag game trips.
You’re not that dense are you...
 
I have a hard time having any excitement for the garbage home games (outside of Army and possibly BC) the next 3 years. I know the refrain will be "ECU Tulsa etc etc were no better" but the AAC had better games. UConn may go 3 years without playing a ranked team at home.
 
I always thought this save on travel explanation was BS for leaving the AAC. Here is further evidence. If anything, in football we may log more miles when you factor in Rocky Mountain, west coast and SEC body bag game trips.
It's not just football. Last year remembered noting the UConn was playing Tulane in volleyball and almost went to it but something came up. I was thinking then "boy that is a lot of people to sent to NOLA for 2 to 3 days and I know it isn't cheap to get hotel rooms here". That type savings must also factor in.
 
.-.
Saving on travel is about everything but football
You’re not that dense are you...
Football travels with 100 people - it’s the elephant in the room. Additionally, For the other teams with relatively small travel parties, the Big East has teams now in OH, IL, WI and NE. I know another consultant gave the state what numbers they were looking for but this is silly. There’s not going to be any meaningful travel savings in a budget that runs a $40 million annual deficit. There are much bigger fish to fry.
 
Football travels with 100 people - it’s the elephant in the room. Additionally, For the other teams with relatively small travel parties, the Big East has teams now in OH, IL, WI and NE. I know another consultant gave the state what numbers they were looking for but this is silly. There’s not going to be any meaningful travel savings in a budget that runs a $40 million annual deficit. There are much bigger fish to fry.
Football travel is what is. It’s a net equal. The 25 or so other sports no longer have their 2nd closest Conference game in OH. Those Midwest schools are now the far ones not the close ones.
 
Football travels with 100 people - it’s the elephant in the room. Additionally, For the other teams with relatively small travel parties, the Big East has teams now in OH, IL, WI and NE. I know another consultant gave the state what numbers they were looking for but this is silly. There’s not going to be any meaningful travel savings in a budget that runs a $40 million annual deficit. There are much bigger fish to fry.

disingenuous. The current conf has 1 school in driving distance. One. Yes, some travel still, but not every game is 500+ miles away.
 
Last edited:
I have a hard time having any excitement for the garbage home games (outside of Army and possibly BC) the next 3 years. I know the refrain will be "ECU Tulsa etc etc were no better" but the AAC had better games. UConn may go 3 years without playing a ranked team at home.

Ranked team sure. But I guarantee you ... this Fanbase is exhausted from the soul sapping 56-10 games.

A season or two of 5-7 and some hope is what is needed
 
Ranked team sure. But I guarantee you ... this Fanbase is exhausted from the soul sapping 56-10 games.

A season or two of 5-7 and some hope is what is needed

5 wins next year means beating UMass, Maine, ODU, Liberty and MTSU and / or have an upset on the road. Assuming Maine and UMass are wins (crossing fingers), then if ODU and MTSU are still bad let's put them in the win column. But Liberty and SJSU likely won't be easy - Liberty crushed UMass and Maine, and SJSU lost a lot of close games.

I don't see more than 4 wins next year, and that's giving UConn the benefit of the doubt against a weak schedule.
 
I can't believe we're talking about the number of football players that have to travel. This is silly, and travel has already been hashed out as a seven-figure net positive in print for the AD after the Big East move.

Yes, 100 people have to travel to six road games somewhere in the country by plane. And they've always had to, save 1 game against Temple. The men's basketball team has to travel maybe 18 times. So does the women's basketball team. The two soccer teams maybe about 12 - 14 times each? And so on.

Now, those teams don't have to fly to play Providence, Seton Hall, St. John's, Villanova, etc. Anyone arguing against that is simply being a pain in the back side on purpose...
 
.-.
Football travel is what is. It’s a net equal. The 25 or so other sports no longer have their 2nd closest Conference game in OH. Those Midwest schools are now the far ones not the close ones.

In truth though, the amount of money we were spending (and thus are now saving) on travel is usually overblown.

We have 22 sports (10 M, 12 W) we sponsor at varsity.

For nine of those sports, (Cross Country M&W, Track and Field M&W, Swimming and Diving M&W, men's golf, Tennis M&W), the only conference competition we have is a once a year conference championship. Most of the competition takes place regionally rather than interconference, and will frequently not even be against one single team but rather in multiteam meets (Cross Country, for example, competed in the Paul Short Run at Lehigh this year, and 45 schools ran in that event).

Women's crew is similar, and didn't go further than Philadelphia for a meet, without even an AAC championship to contend with.

Women's lacrosse played in the American, but only UConn, Cincinnati, Temple and ECU played in that league (alongside otherwise SEC teams Florida and Vanderbilt). In other words, the three closest teams in the American.

Field hockey never left the Big East (and field hockey is another one of those sports where very often, teams would play each other at another team's home venue just because they were already there; the somewhat infamous Kent State fireworks controversy this past season took place at a game between Maine and Temple; UConn itself played a match against Northwestern at Stanford's home field on the same weekend the Huskies played the Cardinal).

Men's and women's hockey ice hockey play in Hockey East, which has most of its teams within a two hour drive.

Baseball and softball were going to play lots of events in Florida, Texas or the rest of the sun belt anyway, regardless of what conference we were in. The only thing that changed with being in the AAC was whether those were conference games, or non-conference games against Northern teams that were played in Florida anyway.

That just leaves six with any kind of relevant travel expenses relating to playing in the American: football, men's and women's basketball, men's and women's soccer, and volleyball.

And of those, men's and women's basketball were likely profitable enough that the travel expenses for an AAC schedule were nullified, and football is football.

So the pain of travel was really down to three sports. Men's and women's soccer, and women's volleyball.
 
What I wanna know is will the aac b-ball refs kick us in the ass on our way out the football refs did?
 
And of those, men's and women's basketball were likely profitable enough that the travel expenses for an AAC schedule were nullified, and football is football.

So the pain of travel was really down to three sports. Men's and women's soccer, and women's volleyball.

I don't pay attention to most of the other sports in your post so Ill take your word for it but the basketball point doesn't make any sense. Cutting down the expenses is good regardless of how profitable the programs are
 
disingenuous. The current conf has 1 school in driving distance. One. Yes, some travel still, but not every game is 500+ miles away.
Providence, Seton Hall, St Johns, Nova... You think they are flying from Hartford, to NYC?
 
.-.
What I wanna know is will the aac b-ball refs kick us in the ass on our way out the football refs did?
I wouldn't expect them to do UConn any favors and besides, the Huskies with their sloppy play are doing a good enough job kicking themselves in the .
 
Football travels with 100 people - it’s the elephant in the room. Additionally, For the other teams with relatively small travel parties, the Big East has teams now in OH, IL, WI and NE. I know another consultant gave the state what numbers they were looking for but this is silly. There’s not going to be any meaningful travel savings in a budget that runs a $40 million annual deficit. There are much bigger fish to fry.

Not everyone travels. Up to school but would be closer to 50 maybe a little more.
 
I don't pay attention to most of the other sports in your post so Ill take your word for it but the basketball point doesn't make any sense. Cutting down the expenses is good regardless of how profitable the programs are

My point is that it largely wasn’t going to be an issue. We’d have been more than be able to cover for it from revenue.

Obviously our expenses will be significantly lower replacing trips to Houston and Dallas with Providence and New York. And much more convenient for the traveling fan, which is something else that breeds bigger and better engagement.
 
.-.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,267
Messages
4,560,498
Members
10,452
Latest member
WashingtonH


Top Bottom