MO stuns SC (merged thread) | Page 5 | The Boneyard

MO stuns SC (merged thread)

Didn't you read what I said? According to the rules, it is impossible to score with .1 on the clock. She did not need to call a timeout with .1 left. I said if she did it because the Missouri coach did, then she may have been mocking her. If that is what she did, then that would be poor sportsmanship. Didn't you ever speculate before, or do you only post when you know the answer?
I don't think that is the rule in the NCAA - apparently they can tap it in. As per Rebecca and others. It IS the rule in the pros (at least the men's side and I think the "W"). Also, and regardless, it was time enough to be fouled.
 
Yes I watch this last play at least 10 times. When the ball was released on air it is already 0.1 sec. So no matter weather Boston catches it or not the game is over.
Boston could have tipped the ball, but to re-direct it into the basket when it is moving away from the basket is beyond difficult to say the least. That is why Missouri stacked the lane on the left side so the momentum of the ball would have to be reversed on a tip.
 
I'm not disputing your account of the UConn-GT game in the slightest. Watching that game was for me the closest thing to Misery with a capital M since that dude had his ankles broken by a sledgehammer.

I'm mainly pointing out the silly reaction among some to default to fawning over the SEC.

There's absolutely no way SC, with all its starters and all its depth, should have lost to a team ranked #50 in Massey that was missing its best player plus several others. Just because SC kept it closer down the stretch doesn't IMO make it a "better" loss.
Put me in the category of "fawning over the SEC". Look at the numbers. They have 5-6 teams with a legitimate shot at winning the NC. They are clearly the strongest conference in women's college basketball. Compare that to the Big East. They are incomparable, and the big east is stronger than normal this year.
 
Seemed like average to good job coaching by Dawn. Brilliant job by Missouri. SC was down most of the last 10 minutes but Dawn got clutch plays from several players to get her team in the lead with one second left. Classic set of screens and brilliant drive to win game for Missouri. Anyone who loves high motion offensive basketball should watch this game. What has been suggested would work well for this year's UConn team (i.e. double screens, high low passing, etc.), kept Boston and the other SC bigs moving on defense and may have tired out the SC guards and contributed to their horrid shooting.
High motion offense is exactly what Uconn needs to beat them as well. That and a prayer that SC will miss their 3 pointers at the same rate. No doubt though, the way to beat them is make them shoot jump shots, block out and rebound. Keep turnovers to a minimum and make our shots. Pray they miss theirs. It seems Cooke is suffering from "pressure" disease. She's got a lot on her plate right now.
 
I really don't think SC will lose the #1 ranking. They've looked so good against everyone else, and we all are susceptible of a bad game once in a while. I don't think that anyone else has shown as much as them in order to take that ranking away from them. BTW, the ending was really strange. Missouri scored with .1 second on the clock. There is no way a score can be made with less then .3, but Missouri called time out. But what was really strange is that SC called time out after the Missouri time out. What was the point of any of that? I get that the Missouri coach was so pumped by the fact they were going to beat the top team, and not thinking just wanted to put all her ducks in a row. But why did Dawn call a time out after, to Mock her? Not good sportsmanship.
I doubt it was to mock her. Maybe Dawn needed to finish telling her team something. There’s always a chance a foul is called. Why just assume it was poor sportsmanship?
 
First and foremost....Happy New Year to all. I hope your 2022 brings you good health, success, joy and love. It really hurts that this is the second season that is being impacted by this virus. I believe that this variant will be fast moving, intense and burn out quickly. Maybe peak in mid-January and begin to disappear at the end of January.

Making up lost games will become difficult but I believe most of the games will be made up. I have been rather amused at the folks who think that if the number one team loses to an unranked team who was minus their best player that their place in the rankings will remain unchanged. I know it was a close game and the Basketball gods were not friendly to South Carolina but, c'mon they are not supposed to lose a game like that. They have to pay a price for that loss...the integrity of the polls depends on it. I don't think the slap down will be that severe...I think they drop one spot because the committee will reward their previous record.

However, we must be cognizant of what the committee did to UConn...hey did UConn deserve to go down in the rankings that would be an emphatic yes...but, losing to Louisville (6) while UConn was ranked (7) by 5 points in a close game with 6 players gone from the roster (2 in the transfer portal and 4 to the injury bug) did not deserve a 4 place drop out of the top 10. That in my opinion was a "kick them while they are down" move by the powers that be.

I am not even saying that UConn in its current condition doesn't deserve to be out of the top ten. They are basically playing with 6 players. What I am saying is that based on a single game loss to drop four spots after losing in a close game to a team that is ranked higher than you while your best player and arguably 3 players that can come in and contribute is a tad of an overkill that would only be magnified if the committee doesn't at least penalize SC by dropping them at least one spot for losing to an unranked team who was short handed.
 
.-.
I really don't think SC will lose the #1 ranking. They've looked so good against everyone else, and we all are susceptible of a bad game once in a while. I don't think that anyone else has shown as much as them in order to take that ranking away from them. BTW, the ending was really strange. Missouri scored with .1 second on the clock. There is no way a score can be made with less then .3, but Missouri called time out. But what was really strange is that SC called time out after the Missouri time out. What was the point of any of that? I get that the Missouri coach was so pumped by the fact they were going to beat the top team, and not thinking just wanted to put all her ducks in a row. But why did Dawn call a time out after, to Mock her? Not good sportsmanship.
Most likely Dawn called timeout after seeing the Missouri defensive set up seen it done plenty of times in sports
 
However, we must be cognizant of what the committee did to UConn...hey did UConn deserve to go down in the rankings that would be an emphatic yes...but, losing to Louisville (6) while UConn was ranked (7) by 5 points in a close game with 6 players gone from the roster (2 in the transfer portal and 4 to the injury bug) did not deserve a 4 place drop out of the top 10. That in my opinion was a "kick them while they are down" move by the powers that be.
The committee? Do you mean the selection committee? They have zero to do with polls - those are voted on by the press (AP poll) or by coaches. And polls have zero to do with seeding for the NCAA tournament. Polls are for fan bragging rights only
 
First and foremost....Happy New Year to all. I hope your 2022 brings you good health, success, joy and love. It really hurts that this is the second season that is being impacted by this virus. I believe that this variant will be fast moving, intense and burn out quickly. Maybe peak in mid-January and begin to disappear at the end of January.

Making up lost games will become difficult but I believe most of the games will be made up. I have been rather amused at the folks who think that if the number one team loses to an unranked team who was minus their best player that their place in the rankings will remain unchanged. I know it was a close game and the Basketball gods were not friendly to South Carolina but, c'mon they are not supposed to lose a game like that. They have to pay a price for that loss...the integrity of the polls depends on it. I don't think the slap down will be that severe...I think they drop one spot because the committee will reward their previous record.

However, we must be cognizant of what the committee did to UConn...hey did UConn deserve to go down in the rankings that would be an emphatic yes...but, losing to Louisville (6) while UConn was ranked (7) by 5 points in a close game with 6 players gone from the roster (2 in the transfer portal and 4 to the injury bug) did not deserve a 4 place drop out of the top 10. That in my opinion was a "kick them while they are down" move by the powers that be.

I am not even saying that UConn in its current condition doesn't deserve to be out of the top ten. They are basically playing with 6 players. What I am saying is that based on a single game loss to drop four spots after losing in a close game to a team that is ranked higher than you while your best player and arguably 3 players that can come in and contribute is a tad of an overkill that would only be magnified if the committee doesn't at least penalize SC by dropping them at least one spot for losing to an unranked team who was short handed.
This was ESPN and all those voters to finally try to show their dislike and jealousy of UConn because of their Long time domination!!!!
 
First and foremost....Happy New Year to all. I hope your 2022 brings you good health, success, joy and love. It really hurts that this is the second season that is being impacted by this virus. I believe that this variant will be fast moving, intense and burn out quickly. Maybe peak in mid-January and begin to disappear at the end of January.

Making up lost games will become difficult but I believe most of the games will be made up. I have been rather amused at the folks who think that if the number one team loses to an unranked team who was minus their best player that their place in the rankings will remain unchanged. I know it was a close game and the Basketball gods were not friendly to South Carolina but, c'mon they are not supposed to lose a game like that. They have to pay a price for that loss...the integrity of the polls depends on it. I don't think the slap down will be that severe...I think they drop one spot because the committee will reward their previous record.

However, we must be cognizant of what the committee did to UConn...hey did UConn deserve to go down in the rankings that would be an emphatic yes...but, losing to Louisville (6) while UConn was ranked (7) by 5 points in a close game with 6 players gone from the roster (2 in the transfer portal and 4 to the injury bug) did not deserve a 4 place drop out of the top 10. That in my opinion was a "kick them while they are down" move by the powers that be.

I am not even saying that UConn in its current condition doesn't deserve to be out of the top ten. They are basically playing with 6 players. What I am saying is that based on a single game loss to drop four spots after losing in a close game to a team that is ranked higher than you while your best player and arguably 3 players that can come in and contribute is a tad of an overkill that would only be magnified if the committee doesn't at least penalize SC by dropping them at least one spot for losing to an unranked team who was short handed.

It's not so much dropping a spot but how many pts you lose in the vote. When UConn lost to Louis. they had been tied in the pts with Tenn. That means that going into the games vs Stan & Louis they were equal. Both lose, UConn at a neutral site and Tenn at home. UConn dropped 100 pts in the vote while Tenn dropped 50.

SCar was about 70 pts ahead of No 2. I expect they will lose some of their lead but still be No 1.
 
SC didn't help themselves in this game. I'm not a mind reader, but they looked complacent. They are good enough to win when everything isn't clicking and they seemed determined to carry out that plan...get a "W" and go home without breaking a sweat. Mizzou kids played really well. Having said that...officials get a D here. Again...the flopping needs to be addressed. And don't blow a whistle because someone launches themselves on the floor or snaps their head back without seeing actual contact. On one play Saxton slipped and fell while guarding a player driving to the basket. She never touched the driving player and was called for a foul!
 
just saw the game....the final play in for SC....one tenth of a second..... lob to Boston under the basket.... and she caught it and put it in .... of course only a tip in would be legal.... and Boston extended her arms like a wide receiver trying to get a pass interference... thought was so interesting because 2 timeouts were directly before that play in.... did Dawn have a coaching lapse or was Boston not listening.
 
.-.
just saw the game....the final play in for SC....one tenth of a second..... lob to Boston under the basket.... and she caught it and put it in .... of course only a tip in would be legal.... and Boston extended her arms like a wide receiver trying to get a pass interference... thought was so interesting because 2 timeouts were directly before that play in.... did Dawn have a coaching lapse or was Boston not listening.
I did something last night that I never thought I would never do...I watched the replay of a WBB game where UConn wasn't playing!!! I even find it hard to watch other team's games live.
Anyways, I had to laugh at Boston following the final SC play. Did she actually not know that she couldn't score with only 0.1 left? I guess she was hoping that at least one of the refs didn't know the rules or Dee Kantner would miraculously show up to overturn the game refs. :):rolleyes:
 
I did something last night that I never thought I would never do...I watched the replay of a WBB game where UConn wasn't playing!!! I even find it hard to watch other team's games live.
Anyways, I had to laugh at Boston following the final SC play. Did she actually not know that she couldn't score with only 0.1 left? I guess she was hoping that at least one of the refs didn't know the rules or Dee Kantner would miraculously show up to overturn the game refs. :):rolleyes:
I love Boston's reaction as well. Hey, it was worth a shot on her part to try. You never know. :D
 
This was ESPN and all those voters to finally try to show their dislike and jealousy of UConn because of their Long time domination!!!!

Can you explain why ESPN dislikes and is jealous of UConn?
 
.-.
And then former SC players making tweets about how Mizzou is the hardest place to play because of this and that and shading the fans. Between Dawn “the ball tho” Staley and this, is this pretty on par for how SC usually rationalizes losses??
 
Can you explain why ESPN dislikes and is jealous of UConn?
Can you explain why ESPN dislikes and is jealous of UConn?
I should have said the voters on the ESPN ballot.A short handed team loses 2 games to good teams. I wonder if it was Aaliyah Boston for South Carolina how far would they have fallen
 
First and foremost....Happy New Year to all. I hope your 2022 brings you good health, success, joy and love. It really hurts that this is the second season that is being impacted by this virus. I believe that this variant will be fast moving, intense and burn out quickly. Maybe peak in mid-January and begin to disappear at the end of January.

Making up lost games will become difficult but I believe most of the games will be made up. I have been rather amused at the folks who think that if the number one team loses to an unranked team who was minus their best player that their place in the rankings will remain unchanged. I know it was a close game and the Basketball gods were not friendly to South Carolina but, c'mon they are not supposed to lose a game like that. They have to pay a price for that loss...the integrity of the polls depends on it. I don't think the slap down will be that severe...I think they drop one spot because the committee will reward their previous record.

However, we must be cognizant of what the committee did to UConn...hey did UConn deserve to go down in the rankings that would be an emphatic yes...but, losing to Louisville (6) while UConn was ranked (7) by 5 points in a close game with 6 players gone from the roster (2 in the transfer portal and 4 to the injury bug) did not deserve a 4 place drop out of the top 10. That in my opinion was a "kick them while they are down" move by the powers that be.

I am not even saying that UConn in its current condition doesn't deserve to be out of the top ten. They are basically playing with 6 players. What I am saying is that based on a single game loss to drop four spots after losing in a close game to a team that is ranked higher than you while your best player and arguably 3 players that can come in and contribute is a tad of an overkill that would only be magnified if the committee doesn't at least penalize SC by dropping them at least one spot for losing to an unranked team who was short handed.
It's not a question of punishing or rewarding. It's a question of adding new data—does this game, and everything else all the other contenders have done, change what you think about who is better than who. It seems pretty reasonable to see this game and think SC is still probably the best team in the country at the moment.
 
And then former SC players making tweets about how Mizzou is the hardest place to play because of this and that and shading the fans. Between Dawn “the ball tho” Staley and this, is this pretty on par for how SC usually rationalizes losses??
Andraya carter and other nonSC players made similar comments about Columbia.
 
Andraya carter and other nonSC players made similar comments about Columbia.
Both Columbias are tough places to play. And there's history between SC and Mizzou, so the crowds are more amped up than usual when those teams play each other. I don't see it as the SC players making excuses as much as a general and truthful comment.
 
.-.
And for hanging banners.
Do you guys give Duke a hard time about the #1 in the polls banners from years UConn won the NationalChampionship or is that reserved for a banner that is actually a #1 final poll where there was no tournament? Duke has 2 hanging. IDK about other programs, nor do I care, but just wondering why two years later it’s still a big deal.
 
And then former SC players making tweets about how Mizzou is the hardest place to play because of this and that and shading the fans. Between Dawn “the ball tho” Staley and this, is this pretty on par for how SC usually rationalizes losses??
There is some really bad history between SC and Missouri…if you don’t know the history then you don’t really understand the comments. It has nothing to do about it being an excuse. There have been fist fights and lawsuits and firings over happenings between these two WBB programs. It started back when A’ja played and has continued.
 
Do you guys give Duke a hard time about the #1 in the polls banners from years UConn won the NationalChampionship or is that reserved for a banner that is actually a #1 final poll where there was no tournament? Duke has 2 hanging. IDK about other programs, nor do I care, but just wondering why two years later it’s still a big deal.

Hey... hey... let's leave Duke outta this... thanks.
 
Hey... hey... let's leave Duke outta this... thanks.
But you can vouch for it. There are TWO banners hanging there in the rafters at Duke. One says AP Final National Ranking 1 2004 and the other says USA Today Women's Final National Ranking 1 2003. In both of those years UConn beat Tennessee for the National Championship. At least the banner in SC is for a year that there was NO National Champion and they were actually ranked #1 in ALL the polls to end the year. LOL
 
Last edited:
Do you guys give Duke a hard time about the #1 in the polls banners from years UConn won the NationalChampionship or is that reserved for a banner that is actually a #1 final poll where there was no tournament? Duke has 2 hanging. IDK about other programs, nor do I care, but just wondering why two years later it’s still a big deal.
It'll probably become iconic because it always draws SCar fan reactions when it's mentioned. Be happy you don't have to live with accusations of cheating. :)
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,350
Messages
4,566,478
Members
10,468
Latest member
ADD3LA


Top Bottom