Mike DiMauro's article sums up many on Boneyard | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Mike DiMauro's article sums up many on Boneyard

Why though? People carry signs protesting presidents suggesting they be impeached. We're not calling for the head of a machinist making ends meet for his family in the private sector; he's the state's highest paid employee. Saying "Fire Ollie" is civil discourse. That isn't calling him names or being threatening, it's stating an opinion pretty respectfully, and in a strategic way that generates publicity. Saying he should be fired says nothing about what anyone thinks of him as a person
like he said - some people just don't grow up
 
And if the sign said "I love you KO - 4 more years"
Yeah - your going to say that they had the right to have the sign and to be a stupid aresewipe

blindfolds have nothing to do with it btw - that's just lib talking points

If you don't like KO you don't like him but a sign like that is plain stupid to bring into an arena where it could cause issues
Id be totally fine if someone wanted to profess their love for KO via a sign, you're just assuming there my friend (and we all know what happens when you assume)

and what are the exact issues it may cause? Hurt feelings? If anything, it's an honest reflection of one mans opinion on the program. If some in the administration are too thin skinned to accept one fans opinion, we're worst off than I originally imagined. And by the amount of boos heard arena wide at the XL he is not alone.
 
He basically summarized what we have all been babbling about for the last 2+ years. You can’t win without players, or shooters. Yesterday was a clinic in that. Reverse coaches and Jay Wright couldn’t win.

Reverse coaches and Jay Wright would have prioritized recruiting shooters instead of guys like Larrier who look the part but can't actually play.
 
.-.
I’m with Mau here. Yes, he has every right to bring the sign into the arena. And the arena, hired out by the university, has every right to confiscate it.

But it shows a clear immaturity. It’s a matter of class, grace, and appropriateness, regardless of whether he’s right or wrong. Yeah, you get your tantrum on national TV. But it has no effect, and is just a bad look during a reunion game between two old rivals. What, is that the start of some nascent movement?

You’re free to disagree, just as I disagree with you.
 
I’m with Mau here. Yes, he has every right to bring the sign into the arena. And the arena, hired out by the university, has every right to confiscate it.

But it shows a clear immaturity. It’s a matter of class, grace, and appropriateness, regardless of whether he’s right or wrong. Yeah, you get your tantrum on national TV. But it has no effect, and is just a bad look during a reunion game between two old rivals. What, is that the start of some nascent movement?

You’re free to disagree, just as I disagree with you.

Um he doesn’t have a right to bring the sign.

By using to the ticket you agree to follow the terms and conditions.

The rules are no signs.

You don’t need Matlock for this one.
 
Um he doesn’t have a right to bring the sign.

By using to the ticket you agree to follow the terms and conditions.

The rules are no signs.

You don’t need Matlock for this one.
Actually, now that you mention it, you’re right.
 
Why though? People carry signs protesting presidents suggesting they be impeached. We're not calling for the head of a machinist making ends meet for his family in the private sector; he's the state's highest paid employee. Saying "Fire Ollie" is civil discourse. That isn't calling him names or being threatening, it's stating an opinion pretty respectfully, and in a strategic way that generates publicity. Saying he should be fired says nothing about what anyone thinks of him as a person
I like your new look.
Doesn't mean I agree with you, but I'm listening.
 
.-.
Actually, now that you mention it, you’re right.
I think you got it more right the first time.
He can bring the sign (though not really as a "right"), and they can confiscate it (as part of the revocable license under which the admittance was purchased).
Similarly, Sammy can appropriate the image for his avatar, and Tom can remove it.
Swirling around all of this is that, as with common sense, common courtesy isn't so common any more.
 
The best thing that could have happened all the way around was for it to be confiscated. I don't like that stuff at sporting events, so i'm glad it was taken away. On the flip side, I agree with the sentiment. And the sentiment is being seen by a lot more people thanks to it being confiscated as opposed to it being simply left alone.
 
I don't respect idiots, pretty simple.

Ollie unlike his paycheck has earned these signs and getting booed.

That fan you call an idiot cares more about this program than you.
 
Ollie unlike his paycheck has earned these signs and getting booed.

That fan you call an idiot cares more about this program than you.
Well that's just BS. You can disagree with Mau's position but that doesn't mean he cares less about the program. He's on the GD BY every day for Christ sake. Myself I wouldn't call the fan an idiot but I don't like the look on national TV.
 
I think you got it more right the first time.
He can bring the sign (though not really as a "right"), and they can confiscate it (as part of the revocable license under which the admittance was purchased).
Similarly, Sammy can appropriate the image for his avatar, and Tom can remove it.
Swirling around all of this is that, as with common sense, common courtesy isn't so common any more.

‘Right’ would imply this is protected speech. It’s not. You don’t have a right to bring signs.

Changing the word right to can/could changes the entire post.

You can do whatever you choose. That doesn’t have anything to do with your rights.
 
If you're not allowed to bring in signs, positive or negative, then the sign should have been confiscated. If a fan is a jerk for bringing in a negative sign what is he/she for bringing in a positive sign? Isn't "positive" or "negative" highly subjective?
 
.-.
If you're not allowed to bring in signs, positive or negative, then the sign should have been confiscated. If a fan is a jerk for bringing in a negative sign what is he/she for bringing in a positive sign? Isn't "positive" or "negative" highly subjective?
Subjective? Sure
Highly? Not so much
 
I don’t recall ever seeing the “Olliewood” signs being confiscated.

The kid made his message and it hit the attention of the fans & media to the point that we now have a thread discussing it as well as mention in recent articles. Confiscated or not, he succeeded.
Correct me if I’m wrong but the Olliewoof propaganda was distributed to the student section by the school.

Same with the player face cut outs.
 
Ollie unlike his paycheck has earned these signs and getting booed.

That fan you call an idiot cares more about this program than you.

Well that's way off I promise. But continue on and amuse me and everyone else. The kids a and if you agree.....
 
Correct me if I’m wrong but the Olliewoof propaganda was distributed to the student section by the school.

Same with the player face cut outs.
Yes, those Olliewood and other random signs of players faces are distributed to the students by the school.
 
Well that's just BS. You can disagree with Mau's position but that doesn't mean he cares less about the program. He's on the GD BY every day for Christ sake. Myself I wouldn't call the fan an idiot but I don't like the look on national TV.

C'mon that look is great for Jor Girard who you kidding imno? I'm sure he was impressed with the sign while being recruited, what wonderful fans. LOL :eek:
 
.-.
Keep bringing in those signs that's a real mans way to present one's opinion. ;)
Completely agree with you MAU. It's not bad enough that we got trounced by 20 on national TV. Now imagine how much worse it would look with fans holding Fire Ollie signs in the crowd. Why would any prospective coach come here? If you're a recruit, might you re-open your recruitment just to be on the safe side? Go write en editorial to the Courant or protest outside Gampel, but leave the sign at home.
 
Well that's just BS. You can disagree with Mau's position but that doesn't mean he cares less about the program. He's on the GD BY every day for Christ sake. Myself I wouldn't call the fan an idiot but I don't like the look on national TV.

I was being sarcastic on the reply FYI didn't sound right after I read it just now :D
 
Ollie is disrespecting the university. Taking their 3 million a year(which we can't afford in the first place) and blowing up the program. The least he can do is read the fans sign.
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,331
Messages
4,564,767
Members
10,464
Latest member
Rollskies27


Top Bottom