Can someone explain to me why Pitino seems to be is the only head coach being fired, while the HCs of all the other named schools are barely even being mentioned?
You missed one of my points. Duke's coach has never been associated with cheating because the NCAA chose to look away. You see where I wrote about Quinn Snyder? He was an assistant at Duke and noticed cheating going on and so he did the same things when he was the head coach at Missouri U. He admitted it and the NCAA did not investigate. Why? Because Duke is one of their big money makers.
Oldude gave a good explanation. Louisville has taken the initiative so far. A smart move on their part before the NCAA brings down the hammer. I'll give their interm president credit for moving quickly on this.
As to sanctions by Emmert and the NCAA as to programs and players, don't expect anything any time soon. They don't dare open their mouths at this point.
I don't know what happened at Duke while Snyder was there. I am saying what Snyder told the media in St. Louis and Columbia. I would think he would know better than you do because he observed it. You Duke fans think Coach K and Duke can do no wrong. You are speaking of one instance. I don't know why Snyder would say that about Duke if it did not happen while he was there. In the 1990's UCLA was no longer the BIG name it once was. I already spoke of what happened with Kentucky and that happened only after an envelope filled with cash was discovered and the NCAA had no choice but to punish Kentucky. Kentucky and Kansas went through went some lean years and that is when the NCAA went after them. They were not the money makers they had been. Think what you want to think but I was following some of this stuff since the 1960's and I know what was reported by the media.That never happened. Literally never happened. Quin was in trouble for what he chose to do as the head coach Missouri. I can tell you, Coach K would NEVER have tolerated what Quin did. I was at Duke from 1997 until 2000, during the last few years of Quin's tenure as an assistant coach. I also lived in the same small apartment building as three basketball players, all upperclassmen (side note...of the three, one of them did not have a car, the second drove an old, beatup pickup truck that belonged to his parents, and the third drove an older model jeep).
Anecdote
I can tell you this. Duke takes compliance VERY seriously. One of my closest friends is a HUGE donor to Duke - he and his wife gave the naming rights for one of the assistant coaches' offices. Years ago, they were hosting a Duke alumni event at which time a then- current Duke basketball player attended (he was in town).
At the event, the Duke basketball player did NOT eat or drink. When my friend and his wife asked if something was wrong, he said he could not do so, because it might be considered an improper benefit. My friend called the Duke compliance office, which confirmed what the player said.
So may friend and his wife asked if they could give the player player bottled water. The Duke compliance office said no. My friend asked if the player could give money for the bottled water ($1.75 or whatever). Duke compliance said there was no independent way to verify that the full amount would be paid to make sure it did not constitute an impermissible benefit.
Finally, Duke compliance consented to allow the player to have unfiltered tap water at my friend's home (again, where the event was). As some of you may know, tap water in Arizona is....to put it mildly, awful (it has a lot of chlorine and dissolved materials in it; I always have my Brita ready to go).
It is a relatively small example, but it highlights and demonstrates the importance with which Duke takes compliance.
As for Duke being one of the big money makers, remember that the NCAA went after Kansas and Kentucky in the late 1980s, UCLA in the 1990s, etc. Those are part of the blueblood programs/legendary programs.
Has the University of Miami been implicated in this particular scandal? I see Louisville (not named specifically), Oklahoma State, Auburn, Arizona and USC & South Carolina via previous employment of OSU assistant coach. Keep in mind that Miami is a private university.
Technically it's not the FBI that would have the record, it would be the U.S. attorneys, and I would think winning 87% of their cases would be pretty high.Does the FBI really have a better record than Geno? Are there stats to back this up?
Yeah, but he's still trying. Oh, that yammering is necessary to his pursuit of $44 million in severance, which is necessary to his taking 22 million not to name names. What is necessary to all this occurring: no federal indictment. This could happen. He has always been the master of greasy, slippery escape from his perpetual cheating. Of course, there is that trist on a table he got nailed ... er, bad choice of words ... caught on.
There was an ESPN report that stated that both Bobby Petrino and "likely" Pitino had stipulations in their contracts that the buyout amount would change drastically contingent on Tom Jurich remaining the AD.Call me naive but I think the scandal stops at Pitino. They got rid of the AD and why would he involve anyone higher up the food chain in these schemes (The president?) and no one else cares (or should care) if he names others that are complicit. I do not see where he has any leverage to get any of that money.
Your are right, sounds very fishy that Karen and Tina are up to no good at Texas and Geno recommends Travis for SMU.Muffet said it’s cheating going on in the women’s game too and if you google Geno’s name the article pops up. Why? Most likely jealously. Anyways I feel the real cheating in Women’s Basketball is happening at Texas because of the whole Charli Collier situation. Her statement sounded a bit fishy to me. Karen Aston and Tina Thompson are up to no good over there. That’s why Geno recommended SMU to hire Travis Mays (Geno knows he’s a good person) before that program gets caught.
It is a relatively small example, but it highlights and demonstrates the importance with which Duke takes compliance.
As for Duke being one of the big money makers, remember that the NCAA went after Kansas and Kentucky in the late 1980s, UCLA in the 1990s, etc. Those are part of the blueblood programs/legendary programs.
In 1995 UCLA won's it's eleventh National Championship the first since 1974-75 season. UCLA very much a big Name in the 1990's and no one has ever been the "BIG" name UCLA once was.In the 1990's UCLA was no longer the BIG name it once was.
I do not believe that Duke is out their offering money to recruits the same way that Louisville has been doing.Do you think a 5* top 10 ten player passes up $150,000 offer from Louisville to go to Duke for nothing?
Call me naive but I think the scandal stops at Pitino. They got rid of the AD and why would he involve anyone higher up the food chain in these schemes (The president?) and no one else cares (or should care) if he names others that are complicit. I do not see where he has any leverage to get any of that money.
Quin was at Missouri from 1999-2006, Something reported to the media in that time frame is probably a few google clicks away. What was it that Quin said?I am saying what Snyder told the media in St. Louis and Columbia. I would think he would know better than you do because he observed it. You Duke fans think Coach K and Duke can do no wrong. I don't know why Snyder would say that about Duke if it did not happen while he was there. Think what you want to think but I was following some of this stuff since the 1960's and I know what was reported by the media.
I do not believe that Duke is out their offering money to recruits the same way that Louisville has been doing.