- Joined
- Sep 2, 2011
- Messages
- 1,684
- Reaction Score
- 2,889
Aside from the fact that Tennessee's population is 6.5 million, of whom the great great majority root for either the Vols, and to a much lesser extent Vandy, and that Memphis is a third tier, urban, commuter school, I can see the similarities to UConn. They have all the tools in place to compete at the highest level. Just like they proved in CUSA. Even Herbst has denigrated UConn's endowment of $350 million as woefully inadequate. Memphis' endowment is $180 million.On another note, and in fairness to all new members, we need to evaluate them on their future prospects, and not their past records. Can UM rise from the ashes with a BE logo on their field? If you were not a UConn fan, you would have been skeptical that UConn was a major add to the BE last decade. On that basis alone, we have to give other teams the benefit of the doubt and assume they will advance (a la UConn and Ville) w/BE membership, and not continue to be mired in mediocrity. There is no reason UM can not thrive on the field.
As far as Memphis being the 18th largest city in the US. I believe that NYC is the largest, so we should add Hofstra. If a team plays in a big city yet no one is there to watch it, did the game really exist?
This is purely a basketball move. Which if you have followed Marinatto and the BE is quite surprising considering Providence's disdain for the basketball onlies.