I like Paris but I also think if UCONN is going to bring in a guard in 22 it should be someone that going to help out with the perimeter defense vs another player that going to need shots- Rice or Bransford fits that bill better IMO
I like her too but I wouldn't want to clog up the guard rotation in '22 if there is any chance of getting KK Arnold in '23.
😎
I assuming you mean any two not already coming in the fall since I'd expect Azzi to be on everyone list. For me It would be Saniya Rivers and Sophia Hart. Rivers because I'm petty and I don't want her heading to South Carolina and Hart because well as they say a picture is worth a thousand words so I'll show you. Please don't be fooled this girl is really really skilled basketball player and 6'5".
If you mean swap out 2 for 2 others for a total of 4, my 4 would be have been Fudd, Iriafen who went to Stanford, Ducharme, and Rivers who went to SC. But I'm satisfied with who they got.
I hear ya. Hey, skilled and a little crazy is a good combo.
No. NOT counting the players already signed. I wouldn't give any of them up. My apologies, wrong class. I meant the 2022 class.
Then of course not. Wouldn't want a class of 6. Brady and if possible Patterson in '22.
Ms. Ducharme may provide Ms. Fudd with serious competition for playing time. Her long range stroke looks quite good and she is 6'2", not 5'10".
Agreed! Patterson with ICE I think are the perfect compliments to the team. Those would be the recruits I’d choose to have out of everyone. Small, good quality class.
For me Hart is a hell yes. Her skills are highly underrated, and her videos show her to be a consistent threat from 15 feet in. But Rivers? UConn needs shooters, and Rivers' shot from the arc is suspect. Around the basket she's creative and physical. In the open court she's quick and fast with a nice handle. But her shot? Not. I don't know what Dawn is doing down there in SCar. To me it looks like she's assembling the greatest bunch of highly athletic non-shooters and poor passers in the south. For UConn however Wolfenbarger and Moore would have been so so nice.
uhhhhhhh.........no..............
That was the class I meant to refer to. I was under the influence of medication this morning, sorry.
uhhhhhh.......maybe........uhhhhhhh.........no..............
yes I will forever be saddened that Wolfenbarger didn't end up at UConn...........just the thought of hearing the pay by play announcer say Poffenbarger to Wolfenbarger would have made my day............
nothing against Ms Ducharme who I believe will have a fine career at UConn but Ms Fudd may well be the best shooter in women's basketball.............and I don't mean just college basketball.........uhhhhhh.......maybe........
I have also reluctantly moved in this direction. My reluctance was mainly that I thought Barker would make for a better 3 (SF) than Patterson.
I'd be overjoyed with either! I agree with the Patterson upside but her skill set would overlap greatly with Brady. Barker I envision as a dominant wing in the mold of Rhyne Howard that can create her own offense and facilitate for others. I think Patterson is more in the mold of a Napheesa Collier a dominat PF.I'm not sure it's that close a call for me at this point. I'm don't know what Barker does better and Patterson's upside is ridiculous. Plus, Patterson seems to play much harder going by film footage.
A Patterson/Brady combo would be 🥶 though Stanford could still end up with Betts, Rice, and Gardiner.
My switch to Patterson was mainly my resignation that Barker may well wind up in a Ryne Howard situation. Patterson rotating with Edwards and Brady would be hazardous for the opposition but Barker surrounded by UConn talent would be electric. I’ll qualify this with my thinking that UConn will probably get neither.
Same here. I suspect Barker would prefer the Howard situation.
Patterson is bigger than Barker ?