Map of Highest Paid State Employees (Deadspin)

[RioDog]

I don't understand the following:

1M+ for Geno
1M+ for Calhoun who isn't even coaching anymore
1M+ for P
500k for Warde
200k for a new hockey coach

Why are wasting all this money on a women's basketball coach, a retired men's coach, an awful football coach, an AT BEST avg AD, and a Hockey coach.

That's all of our TV times two.

We need to put all of our resources into football. That's literally the only thing that's getting out of this mess.

Any dime not spent on football that's spent on another sport (besides Ollie) is a waste of our money.

I like Minnesota`s approach. Pay one guy for coaching Hoops AND football...

 

[The Viking]

Look, I don't give two ts about UCONN hockey and guess what? Neither do major conferences.

If that extra 200 thou prevents us from signing a better coordinator in football, then it is money wasted.

It's not even Geno, it's more so even Calhoun making what he does now as an advisor or whatever.bs title he has. Guess who will probably expect the same when they retire?

I just feel like money is being thrown around left and right and its like the AD can't see the only thing that's going to get us out of here is football.

If we spend big time money on the next staff and put up some top 25 seasons, it gives the big12 a reason to expand.

If we can't spend big because all of our money is tied up in a retired hoops coach, girls hopposs coach and a god damn hockey coach of all things, well that.pisses me off.

The B1G cares about hockey. In case you haven't realized it, we're trying to get up to a level that would interest the B1G so that someday the B1G - or someone else - will finally take us.

And save your breath about football. Warde is from the B1G. He IS a football guy. One way or another the university will be better off 12 months from now then it's current standing regarding our football coaching staff. Either due to a better performance by the new staff and new recruits, or a new face leading the program.

 

[CL82]

This is pure semantics, so it's not even worth debating.

I truly think you overstate his reach.

Hardly, it's specifics. I get it, though, you don't like woman's basketball. That's fine but it doesn't mean that Geno is unknown to the rest of the world.

 

[HuskyNan]

This is pure semantics, so it's not even worth debating.

I truly think you overstate his reach.

For the 2010-2011 season, the women's team made a $3.8 million profit, a bit less than the men's team. Last summer, Geno was the coach of the gold medal winning U.S. Olympic Team and the name "UConn" was mentioned numerous times - on national tv - by the announcers. In a year that the men's team was robbed of its chance to play in the post-season, the women's team kept the UConn brand name front and center on ESPN and got a lot of free publicity for the school by winning an improbable championship.

Geno brings in millions with his profitable team and free publicity from keeping the University mentioned time and again in the media. I don't know how you deny him suitable recompense. And as for the rather condescending "where would he go?" comment, to quote the Connecticut Post, "An Ohio State intermediary contacted Auriemma to gauge his interest in the position and basically threw a blank check at him in an attempt to lure him to Columbus, Ohio. No formal offer was made".

 

[ConnHuskBask]

Hardly, it's specifics. I get it, though, you don't like woman's basketball. That's fine but it doesn't mean that Geno is unknown to the rest of the world.

Specifics? Household name to me as far as sports are concerned, would my mother know them. Now, of course she does because she is an alum.

Does the average sports fan know Geno Auriemma, probably.
Does the average person know Geno Auriemma, no way in hell.

And please don't try to spin this as some vendetta against women's sports. Sure, i find the game beyond unwatchable, but I'm here calling out calhouns salary, hockey and warde.

 

[Brochacho]

Does the average sports fan know UConn plays football?

 

[Nostical]

Does the average sports fan know Geno Auriemma, probably. Does the average person know Geno Auriemma, no way in hell.

So average Americans don't know who Geno is?
Lets test your theory. Lets commission a poll.
5 names randomly matched with 5 occupations.
Now match them up.

1 Geno Auriemma. ------------A US Congressman
2 John Beilein-----------------B Italian Inventor
3 Marco Rubio ----------------C US Senator
4 John Boehner---------------D Women's College Basketball Coach
5 Enrico Fermi----------------E Men's College Basketball Coach

Assume this was flashed on every scoreboard in every stadium or arena in America. (Folks who have a connection to sports.) Then pass it out at every Starbucks on a random Tuesday. (Generally a non-sports type crowd) Who would be the person with the highest recognition? Least? What percent of each group of test takers would get Geno correct?

 

[Hoophound]

Either Geno or Rubio.

 

[ConnHuskBask]

So average Americans don't know who Geno is?
Lets test your theory. Lets commission a poll.
5 names randomly matched with 5 occupations.
Now match them up.

1 Geno Auriemma. ------------A US Congressman
2 John Beilein-----------------B Italian Inventor
3 Marco Rubio ----------------C US Senator
4 John Boehner---------------D Women's College Basketball Coach
5 Enrico Fermi----------------E Men's College Basketball Coach

Assume this was flashed on every scoreboard in every stadium or arena in America. (Folks who have a connection to sports.) Then pass it out at every Starbucks on a random Tuesday. (Generally a non-sports type crowd) Who would be the person with the highest recognition? Least? What percent of each group of test takers would get Geno correct?

That quite literally may be the most moronic thing I've ever seen.

I don't even know how to respond to it.

 

[huskymedic]

Give ya $1.00 to take your argument over to the WBB forum - I'm sure they will be happy to help you understand

ConnHuskBask - I rescind my $1 offer... I now offer $10 for you to wander over to the WBB forum for civil discourse

http://the-boneyard.com/threads/ot-with-fans-like-these-who-needs-backside-injections.39094/

 

[UCFBfan]

ConnHuskBask - I rescind my $1 offer... I know offer $10 for you to wander over to the WBB forum for civil discourse

http://the-boneyard.com/threads/ot-with-fans-like-these-who-needs-backside-injections.39094/

I love how people on this site are slated into specific categories of posters/boards and not allowed to be seen as just UConn fans. While I disagree with ConnHuskBask's posts, I find it hilarious that in that thread they just basically called him a genius who just posts on CR crap. Last I checked, many folks here post on many boards and follow all UConn sports. Hilarious none-the-less.

 

[J187Money]

Don't forget Geno's Sold out leadership conference. Lots of people know and care who he is.

 

[HuskyHawk]

This is pure semantics, so it's not even worth debating.

I truly think you overstate his reach.

I don't agree with you on the overall thread, but I think it is clear that there is nobody on earth associated with women playing basketball that is a "household name". He's great, glad we have him and I think they need to pay a guy who brings home 8 NCs. But they paid him too much.

I can't fathom anyone complaining about 200k for a hockey coach when we're joining the best league in the country. Money very well spent.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2

 

[J187Money]

Virtually any top guy in a job anywhere that has been there for a long time is overpaid. So Geno has been treated like any other successful exec.

 

[ConnHuskBask]

I knew this would turn into some women's basketball hating thread even when I specifically said I find it outrageous UConn is still paying Calhoun what they are (especially given that Geno will demand the same).

My overall point is that UConn in the very near future is going to be strapped financially.

Seeing as how improving football is our only ticket out of the AAC, I don't think we can just throw money around and overpay in sports, that quite frankly have no bearing on our future.

If we're spending more on a women's basketball coach than SEC teams are spending on football coaches that illustrates my frustrations.

 

[uconnfan68]

Florida = basketball coach, who would thunk it?

back-to-back NCs.

 

[J187Money]

I knew this would turn into some women's basketball hating thread even when I specifically said I find it outrageous UConn is still paying Calhoun what they are (especially given that Geno will demand the same).

My overall point is that UConn in the very near future is going to be strapped financially.

Seeing as how improving football is our only ticket out of the AAC, I don't think we can just throw money around and overpay in sports, that quite frankly have no bearing on our future.

If we're spending more on a women's basketball coach than SEC teams are spending on football coaches that illustrates my frustrations.

Without Geno revenue does down. No question. So unless you really think you could have had him for 1M less a year I'm not sure what the solution is. If you let him walk you are saying you don't take sports seriously. If I was a football coach and Geno just got dumped over money I would think Uconn is serious?

 

[Nostical]

That quite literally may be the most moronic thing I've ever seen.

LOL---so that's really the most moronic thing you've ever seen? Try it. It might confirm (or shock you) that Geno is the most well known of the bunch. I had my wife send it to her email list of friends who live all over, some in CA, HI, IL, NE KY, NV and TX.--and while it may be a measure of their general apathy toward politics--Geno Auriemma was the most recognizable name on the list. A total of 17 people responded and only 2 got Geno wrong. 15 picked him as the WBBall coach. 12 mixed up Beileine and Boehner. 3 had Rubio as the MBball coach. That may qualify as the most moronic.

 

[CL82]

Specifics? Household name to me as far as sports are concerned, would my mother know them. Now, of course she does because she is an alum.

Does the average sports fan know Geno Auriemma, probably.
Does the average person know Geno Auriemma, no way in hell.

And please don't try to spin this as some vendetta against women's sports. Sure, i find the game beyond unwatchable, but I'm here calling out calhouns salary, hockey and warde.

So the only thing you offered, other than your own opinion, was your mom's opinion...and even she knows Geno. Lol, not much of an argument.

Not a big deal to me one way or the other, but I think you are grossly understating the guy's name recognition.

 

[ConnHuskBask]

So the only thing you offered, other than your own opinion, was your mom's opinion...and even she knows Geno. Lol, not much of an argument.

Not a big deal to me one way or the other, but I think you are grossly understating the guy's name recognition.

The only thing you can offer is opinion, because even if you wanted me to go door to door to every home in America, we'd still argue over what defines household name.

Should i provide a conclusive scientific study like the nostical provided. btw, shocking the average American doesn't know an Italian inventor that's not Da Vinci...

Whether people know him, hasn't been my point. It's the money. It's always been about the money.

 

[Waquoit]

The only thing you can offer is opinion, because even if you wanted me to go door to door to every home in America, we'd still argue over what defines household name.

At a minimum, any household that contains even a casual sports fan knows Geno. But we get it, you won't move off your position no matter what evidence to the contrary. You can be upstater 2.

 

[ConnHuskBask]

At a minimum, any household that contains even a casual sports fan knows Geno. But we get it, you won't move off your position no matter what evidence to the contrary. You can be upstater 2.

Nobody has provided any evidence to either side. Wtf are you taking about?

As I said 5 posts ago, its all opinion and semantics at the end of the day and can't be proven one way or another.

I just think some of you would be shocked getting outside of CT / UConn bubble in regards to women's hoops.

Can we end the notoriety debate though and focus on what's really important though? the fact that were playing a women's basketball coach and a retired men's basketball coach nearly $4 million a year?

 

[CL82]

Initial post:

Sorry, but take off the Connecticut and UConn colored glasses - Geno Aurriema is not a household name across America.

Most recent post:

Whether people know him, hasn't been my point. It's the money. It's always been about the money.

Um yeah... riiiiight.

 

[ConnHuskBask]

Initial post:

Most recent post:


Um yeah... riiiiight.

Um yeah, check again d*ckhead. Post #9.

 

[HuskyNan]

Postscript: Here's a list of the top 11 highest paid by the State of Connecticut. Geno, who's been at UConn for 29 years and who's won 8 National Championships, makes $216,000 more than Pasqualoni. By the way, he raised $4.5 million for the new basketball practice facility from a couple that are boosters of the women's basketball team.

 

[huskymedic]

Postscript: Here's a list of the top 11 highest paid by the State of Connecticut. Geno, who's been at UConn for 29 years and who's won 8 National Championships, makes $216,000 more than Pasqualoni.

These lists are misleading though because no general funds (state tax dollars) or tuition monies are used to provide any of the resources for these contracts (JC, GA or PP) whereas for example Malloy's salary is.

 

[upstater]

These lists are misleading though because no general funds (state tax dollars) or tuition monies are used to provide any of the resources for these contracts (JC, GA or PP) whereas for example Malloy's salary is.

The whole AD though is subsidized by tax dollars, so it's hard to make his argument. I know each program is profitable but to the extent that they are all a part of a department which operates according to laws (title IX) then it's harder to make the argument that they are not supported by taxes.

 

[HuskyNan]

The whole AD though is subsidized by tax dollars, so it's hard to make his argument. I know each program is profitable but to the extent that they are all a part of a department which operates according to laws (title IX) then it's harder to make the argument that they are not supported by taxes.

Only peripherally. From this article from 2011:

The figures are compiled for the Equity in Athletics Data Report (EADA), which is compiled by the U.S. Department of Education to ensure compliance with Title IV. The method of accounting is slightly different, and there are no guidelines on how to report indirect income, but both the school's figures and the EADA report arrived at the same bottom line: a profit of $94,522 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2011.

"We're self-sufficient," said Mike Enright, athletic department spokesman. "We also support recreation, all the intramurals, for instance, in that total."

UConn's athletic department had a $63 million budget. During the 2010-11 academic year, UConn had one of the most successful programs in the country, with the football team going to the Fiesta Bowl, the men's basketball team winning the national championship, the women's team reaching the Final Four and the baseball team advancing to the NCAA Super Regional.

Included in that $63 million budget is $10.2 million, about 16 percent, for athletic scholarships, which the department pays to the school. UConn's athletic department cleared a profit of $126,000 for the year ending June 30, 2010, and $91,000 the previous year. "So we have been fairly consistent," Enright said.

 

[upstater]

Only peripherally. From this article from 2011:

The figures are compiled for the Equity in Athletics Data Report (EADA), which is compiled by the U.S. Department of Education to ensure compliance with Title IV. The method of accounting is slightly different, and there are no guidelines on how to report indirect income, but both the school's figures and the EADA report arrived at the same bottom line: a profit of $94,522 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2011.

"We're self-sufficient," said Mike Enright, athletic department spokesman. "We also support recreation, all the intramurals, for instance, in that total."

UConn's athletic department had a $63 million budget. During the 2010-11 academic year, UConn had one of the most successful programs in the country, with the football team going to the Fiesta Bowl, the men's basketball team winning the national championship, the women's team reaching the Final Four and the baseball team advancing to the NCAA Super Regional.

Included in that $63 million budget is $10.2 million, about 16 percent, for athletic scholarships, which the department pays to the school. UConn's athletic department cleared a profit of $126,000 for the year ending June 30, 2010, and $91,000 the previous year. "So we have been fairly consistent," Enright said.

That doesn't take into account the school subsidy.

 

[TouchdownHusky]

The issue isn't Geno and women's basketball. The issue is the brutal reality of being left out of a major conference. This will be unsustainable long term and the more money we spend on football, the more time we will waste destroying our brand. Again, people, both on a national and local scale, UCONN is a hoops school. Our brand has and always will be built around two elite basketball programs. Either we join a major conference soon or else.............paging Nelson. Are you there Nelson?

And as Lew Perkins said back in the late '90s, UConn needs to invest heavily in football in order to protect the hoops brand both male and female. How true that has been. If UConn doesn't hurry up and get this football thing fixed, the hoops programs will recede (maybe glacier like) from their position of prominence. The major conferences are the future of big time college sports.