You don't know any of that.. it's not wise to speculatively disparage SNY and that goes for everyone on here, not to single you out.. SNY could've offered the same deal as CBSSN (or better) but AD David Benedict solely liked the appeal of being on a more widely distributed network.
I don't know SNY has the women?
The rest is just putting together common and business sense, it really isn't much of a stretch.
I don't know why you would use the word 'disparage". If we had no leverage with SNY, that's on us, not them. The narrative out there when this happened was that we were destroying our football program. We would die as an independent. Why would they trip over themselves offering us money? I never thought they would when this all started.
Now with that said, I wouldn't play them off as jilted either as you imply
The financial aspect of this CBSN deal is very small. Unless they get specific it looks like under 300k per year. A pay game pays more. SNY pays much more for the women. While the national exposure is huge, SNY at any point could have made an offer we couldn't refuse, maybe something even as small as our women's deal. In our financial position I can't see us turning down a difference of 3 million over 4 years.
Again I'm just putting together from what's out there, hopefully full transparency will come
Last edited:
