UCweCONN
Former Poster
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 3,875
- Reaction Score
- 6,606
Jim Calhoun? Two user names? I thought you were NewMember?Believe me, if u truly know my ID. U will be bragging to your friends
Jim Calhoun? Two user names? I thought you were NewMember?Believe me, if u truly know my ID. U will be bragging to your friends
Team dentist?
Visual evidence of the state this program
Is now in for those Ollie supporters still left:
Tremendous.
Which years?I going to state the obvious, Miller was recruiting coordinator during the years that Goodman highlighted that our recruiting was poor.
With his mass, and lack of speed, he was a stretch 4 in the best sets.
Change your tune on the Kyrie trade? Still think Crowder was the best player involved and that IT and Kyrie were a wash?
I going to state the obvious, Miller was recruiting coordinator during the years that Goodman highlighted that our recruiting was poor.
All of them.Which years?
Danny knew things other teams couldn’t.
The Diallo recruitment and a few other slams were 100% Glen Miller trashing Ollie anonymously!!!!
The Vance Jackson stuff also seems like a now it all Dad and a kid who believes everything Daddy says.
Ironically after the Miller firing the Jackson camp made coments about Miller and him getting shafted.
Plenty of other bad bad stuff in the article.
Goodman went to two sources he KNEW would give him big time negative quotes. Like asking someone’ two ex wives about their former husband off record.
Tremendous.
Mainly, that Kyrie was better than the Q thought.
The Nets pick could go anywhere from #1 to #8 so that will greatly affect the analysis of the trade. But you can admit you're wrong. I know this is a random time to bring it up but your username triggers me into thinking about that trade.
At least the guys were hustling there.
Mainly, that Kyrie was better than the Q thought.
The Nets pick could go anywhere from #1 to #8 so that will greatly affect the analysis of the trade. But you can admit you're wrong. I know this is a random time to bring it up but your username triggers me into thinking about that trade.
That's supposed to make me feel better chief?
Mainly, that Kyrie was better than the Q thought.
The Nets pick could go anywhere from #1 to #8 so that will greatly affect the analysis of the trade. But you can admit you're wrong. I know this is a random time to bring it up but your username triggers me into thinking about that trade.
I underrrtaed Brad, despite thinking he’s the best basketball coach in the world not named geno.
Idk how he got kyrie to actually play defense.
Don't think it affects the analysis of the trade much to be honest. At the time, you make the trade knowing that pick is a lottery gamble. That's your risk. Whether it becomes 1 or 8 is really irrelevant. If you didn't make the trade, they would have likely ended up with a different pick anyway.
Which years was Miller the recruiting coordinator so we can rate those classes, thanks in advance. Before KO? For KO?All of them.
You can stick it in your hat with this one, Chief. You were woofing about Enoch when he signed. And the class after that was ranked pretty highly. Miller didn’t run those guys out of town.I going to state the obvious, Miller was recruiting coordinator during the years that Goodman highlighted that our recruiting was poor.
I keep hearing this crap "if things don't dramatically improve then I'm in favor"... WTF!!!!!!!!!!!You're absolutely right. He didn't quote the BY. Instead, he uses the same tactic the "Fire Ollie" crowd here uses. He quotes nothing but anonymous sources, third person hearsay, and unsubstantiated innuendo to support his narrative. Nothing in that article can be proven or disproven relating to comments from anonymous sources. I've yet to see one factual quote on the record from anyone in a position to really know what they're talking about, here or anywhere else. It's a garbage piece of 'journalism'.
That said, I have stated I'll be in favor of moving on at the end of this season if things don't dramatically improve by then. If half the stuff in the article about Ollie is true, it's time to do something about it when this season ends, if we remain on the same trajectory. Whether the AD can find a way to swing it financially is another matter.
I keep hearing this crap "if things don't dramatically improve then I'm in favor"... WTF!!!!!!!!!!!
At this point, just being competitive would be a dramatic improvement.
Anyone. Someone. If such a person exists. What would a 'dramatic' improvement need to be? Winning the last game of the season? Winning 2 of 3? Finishing above .500?
There are 6 games left in this season, and if we're lucky, in Ollie's career as head coach of Uconn. There is maybe 1 win left. But there are at least 3 or 4 more 20 point losses. I just don't get what people think is going to happen after 25 games into the season.
who cares? it doesn't change the fact that uconn basketball sucks ass and Ollie is the head ass sucker. time for him to go.