Other than the deng situaion i think they had a good relationship....uconn has always been an attraction and for soto me of the kids they have blinders on ...some ended up at uconn when they shouldn't haveHe wasn't a big fan of Calhoun.
Other than the deng situaion i think they had a good relationship....uconn has always been an attraction and for soto me of the kids they have blinders on ...some ended up at uconn when they shouldn't haveHe wasn't a big fan of Calhoun.
That's just coachspeak. Meaningless.That KO, the staff, and UConn are still highly respected. If someone only read this board they'd think the exact opposite
Possibly. I honestly have no idea. But i get why someone would be encouraged by what he saidThat's just coachspeak. Meaningless.
Coach Quinn from St. Thomas More saying exactly what I, and many others on this board have been saying. The AAC is a huge problem with these top kids. It just is.
"I think it's taken a hit. Unfortunately, the conference lacks the luster with a lot of these kids. They're in with the top players with every other major program. But the league doesn't bring a lot of national prominence. The rivalries are new; it's a new league trying to find itself. Connecticut is still going after the top-echelon kids in the U.S., and they've got some pretty good players, too."
"It's very difficult for those guys to compete against the Big 10, the Big East, the ACC. If you ask the same question to the people at East Carolina or Tulane - nothing against them, but they're not going after the same kids UConn is going after."
Quinn's team had a sacred heart and a rider commit,that's it... not sure where he is getting his info on high major kids.
When Cal was at Memphis, the conference situation was similar to what UConn is in now. Although we don't like him, Cal is the best recruiter of the modern era, and I know he was able to get one and done guys like D Rose and Dejuan Wagner. But was there a big difference between UConn's recruiting in the AAC and Memphis' in Conference USA besides the one and done guys? I don't remember, but were Memphis' role players back then better recruits than Vital, Vance, Diarra, Enoch etc (I know some of those guys transferred but that is a different issue)? I would like to see a comparison.
Just took a quick look on 247. From 2003-2008, their typical class was one high level 5* a year and a few (2-3) high 4 stars (rankings in the 35-70 range). So yes it was definitely much better, but not like what he has going on at KY.
But Memphis was also dominating the conference (and getting 1 seeds) not finishing 6th.
Just took a quick look on 247. From 2003-2008, their typical class was one high level 5* a year and a few (2-3) high 4 stars (rankings in the 35-70 range). So yes it was definitely much better, but not like what he has going on at KY.
But Memphis was also dominating the conference (and getting 1 seeds) not finishing 6th.
Cal teams vacated two for improper benefits and someone taking a Test for a star play to qualify. His team also performed the biggest choke in my memory to literally give Kansas the NC .Cal may be the greatest recruiter ever when its all said and done. Average coach but he's a great recruiter and motivator. Whether we like Cal or not his players run thru walls for him
Smith might be a little bias since Chill is one of his closet friends in the business. The results in the first three paragraphs tell the current state.
Come on. His nice words are worth a whole lot.
And what does that count for?
He has zero incentive to say anything bad about the head coach of the leading program in the area. Second, even if we assume they are true (they probably are), they count for absolutely nothing.
His top player (MAL) just left us for Providence. And his other top player chose to play for Chris Mullen and St. John's over us.
Neither of which he may have had any influence over at all for all we know. Which is exactly the point. They are nice words, but don't count for a thing until he starts reliably sending his top kids to play for us. Which again he may or may not control.
Let's not go down this path again.it's not true.....while he wasn't thrilled about deng going to UConn he has always supported UConn and has never talked kids out of going there
I tend to agree about the conference, BUT a lot of this is just piling on. For instance, UConn never used to compete with the bottom of the Big East either for recruits. So it's easy to name ECU and Tulane. But the fact is, UConn and Cincy do sometimes overlap. Heck, UConn pulled Polley from Temple's lap.
Also, do kids really look to the BE as a conference for exposure? They're not getting much on Fox Sports. But if they want Villanova or Butler, then yeah those schools now have a national profile. No doubt.
Quinn somewhat overstates the case here.
And Memphis was also losing in the Final 4 and getting their appearances vacated, unlike UConn which actually won the national championship fair and square, without having the school sanctioned.
The AAC just doesn't have the history that The Big East has. It certainly lacks the cache of the SEC, ACC, or even the Big 12. JC, during his early years, was able to recruit his teams by saying, "Come here to Connecticut and play against the best teams with the best players, in the best league in the country." Those days are gone.
True. But that wasn't what the question was about. I just wanted to compare recruiting with UConn in the AAC and Memphis in Conf USA.
When Cal was at Memphis, the conference situation was similar to what UConn is in now. Although we don't like him, Cal is the best recruiter of the modern era, and I know he was able to get one and done guys like D Rose and Dejuan Wagner. But was there a big difference between UConn's recruiting in the AAC and Memphis' in Conference USA besides the one and done guys? I don't remember, but were Memphis' role players back then better recruits than Vital, Vance, Diarra, Enoch etc (I know some of those guys transferred but that is a different issue)? I would like to see a comparison.
Every Cal player recruited carries the stigma of his past tactics.
He knew drummond was going to go to uconn.....he just wanted him to stay another year because he was so young....he also treated andre like another son and did a lot of nurturing.....like i said deng presented some tension and was not jc's kind of recruit personality wise but quinn didn't stand in the way either......jc and jere had some pleasant conversations while andre was at stm.....hell he and particularly ko seemed to live thereHe has had a couple tug of wars with UConn. The Drummond thing didn't go down well, but I seem to remember we were worried about that relationship long before Drummond. I forgot why it was such a concern, but Quinn had a sour relationship with Calhoun.
Most of the brewster players had interest in stm firstHe was definitely sour about Drummond. I mean, come on!
Also, Brewster has been churning out top players compared to STM.
Top recruit. Not top player. Big difference.
Mal didn't do much in any of the games i saw but 2 college assistants that i talked to said he was their best player ....kind of surprised me i thought allen was the best.Top recruit. Not top player. Big difference.
Cal may be the greatest recruiter ever when its all said and done. Average coach but he's a great recruiter and motivator. Whether we like Cal or not his players run thru walls for him
Hogwash. Maybe the assistants but even Cslhoun has soured on Ollie. He doesn't take advice, runs a 1990s NBA offense and is a very weak game coa h. Look. It is very possible to succeed in this league but not by finishing 6th. Since 2010 there have been teams in the final four--heck in the Final game--from supposed lesser leagues half the time. So claiming it can't be done is nothing but a cop out. It is an excuse, not a reason for UConn's decline. The reasons are that we have a mediocre head coach who is not a great recruiter.That KO, the staff, and UConn are still highly respected. If someone only read this board they'd think the exact opposite
Why does UConn need top kids?Coach Quinn from St. Thomas More saying exactly what I, and many others on this board have been saying. The AAC is a huge problem with these top kids. It just is.
"I think it's taken a hit. Unfortunately, the conference lacks the luster with a lot of these kids. They're in with the top players with every other major program. But the league doesn't bring a lot of national prominence. The rivalries are new; it's a new league trying to find itself. Connecticut is still going after the top-echelon kids in the U.S., and they've got some pretty good players, too."
"It's very difficult for those guys to compete against the Big 10, the Big East, the ACC. If you ask the same question to the people at East Carolina or Tulane - nothing against them, but they're not going after the same kids UConn is going after."
Hogwash back at thisHogwash. Maybe the assistants but even Cslhoun has soured on Ollie. He doesn't take advice, runs a 1990s NBA offense and is a very weak game coa h. Look. It is very possible to succeed in this league but not by finishing 6th. Since 2010 there have been teams in the final four--heck in the Final game--from supposed lesser leagues half the time. So claiming it can't be done is nothing but a cop out. It is an excuse, not a reason for UConn's decline. The reasons are that we have a mediocre head coach who is not a great recruiter.
Of course Coach Quinn described perfectly described why everyone who is relaxed on this board need to relax and take a step back and freak out. So there's that.Coach Smith perfectly described why everyone who freaks out on this board need to relax and take a step back.
Hogwash back at this
KO is not respected? He doesn't listen? - to who? and how do you know this?
Stop throwing crap at the wall and seeing what may stick
Just so you know, every time you stop and post on this board a kid runs across your lawn.Hogwash back at this
KO is not respected? He doesn't listen? - to who? and how do you know this?
Stop throwing crap at the wall and seeing what may stick