But (and I'm legitimately asking), what sort of housecleaning is necessary? Who on the team is a chemistry problem? Cooper and Deshields are gone and Holly has all kids she's recruited herself now. All of the recruits were preached to about the family, etc. Horston said she chose Tennessee in part because she felt comfortable there and she liked how the team prayed together before each game.
I've not seen any indication that there are any issues with any of the current players. I'm not disagreeing with either of you - just asking why she would need to approach as "my way or the highway"...?
Ha, good question. Scroll up to HuskyNan's comment on page 6. A tangent emerged on Alaska Anchorage, listed as #10 in the latest D-II rankings.Ok, I’ll bite, why did you put that in this LV thread?
I'll take the bait. For a long time I bit my tongue during the period of postmortem hagiography following Pat's untimely passing, but no longer:
Alaska Anchorage isn't even leading the mighty GNAC conference, Northwest Nazarene of Nampa, ID is a game up on them, with Central Washington (my alma mater!) nipping at their heels.
One fun fact I find fascinating about the Great Northwest Athletic Conference is that it includes the only NCAA team located outside the United States: Simon Fraser University near Vancouver BC.Alaska Anchorage isn't even leading the mighty GNAC conference, Northwest Nazarene of Nampa, ID is a game up on them, with Central Washington (my alma mater!) nipping at their heels.
Don't think you are giving Nikki( it was Caldwell at the time) enough credit in either recruiting or coaching. For one she did snag Markel Walker out of Philly to play at UCLA. Markel was the #4 recruit in the 2009 class I don't believe UCLA has ever had a higher rated recruit in WCBB. During the 2010-11 season Nikki brought her UCLA team into ND and came away with a double OT win. This was the same season ND lost in the national championship game to Texas A&M. That ND team had 8 losses on the season but the only other team to beat ND at home was UCONN-with Maya dropping 31. UCLA would finish that season with 5 total loses the fewest in program history. Nikki was 72 and 26 at UCLA =winning percentage of 73% . Cori Close is 150 and 86=winning percentage 63% KAthy Oliver was 232–208= winning percentage of 52%
Within the conference UCLA finished 2nd twice in three season under Nikki. In 8 years under Close UCLA nad never finished higher than 3rd, and one season finished 8th. Additionally Kathy Oliver had three consecutive losing seasons after her initial campaign at UCLA. Of the last three UCLA coach Nikki was the most productive by a mile.
You can move about 1:00 into this clip. Rennia says something as she's passing the coaches, and Holly is quick to react. Holly misses the entire ensuing Tennessee possession while she's still glowering over Rennia.
Full disclosure, I know Markel and her sister who played at Pitt well enough to tell you that she was not the most coachable or easy player to motivate. I'm also a UCONN fan not advocating for Nikki to go to TN . Just want to set the record straight on Nikki time at UCLA.Maybe you missed where I said I thought she was an excellent x's and o's coach. What she also was at UCLA was a poor administrator and an arrogant personality. Markel Walker was ranked #4 in 2009 and the others were #1, Griner, #2, Bone and #3 Diggins. Did she ever seem that to anyone? In the season when Caldwell Fargas left, Walker had asked for a transfer as did three other players. In 2009, Caldwell signed #4 Walker, Mariah Williams (unranked) and a walk-on, Jackie Shepherd. In 2010, she signed Thea Lemberger, Corrine Costa and Rhema Gardner, all unranked. Her recruiting picked up in 2011 with the signing of #10 Justine Hartman (who went to Cal and was their highest rated recruit to that time and was a total bust because of injuries), #25 Kacy Swain, #27 Sheila Boykin who followed her to LSU. This was also the season she made the unbelievable decision to try to recruit Erica Payne over Reshanda Gray. That is amazingly underwhelming for three seasons at a school that allegedly recruits itself.
If you want to go stats, Caldwell Fargas was 19-12, 9-9 and 4th in the conference in her first season with Kathy Olivier's recruits. KO's final season was 16-15, 10-8 and also 4th T in conference. Before Dixon joined in Caldwell Fargas' second season, UCLA was 4-3. With her they went 21-6 and Dixon was the high scorer and rebounder on the team. However, under Caldwell, UCLA never accomplished what was the apex at that time, which was to beat Stanford. Both Close and Olivier accomplished that. In fact, KO was thought to be on her way out before beating Stanford in the tournament and it bought her a few more seasons.
A lot of those numbers sound a lot like the arguments for keeping Holly. At the end, both Olivier and Close went to the Elite Eight. Olivier should have made it to the Final Four with that Alabama ending. KO, as mediocre a coach as can be, still brought UCLA a conference title and a tournament title. The best Caldwell Fargas did at UCLA were two seconds in conference and two second round losses in the tournament and she has never achieved higher than a Sweet 16 at LSU.
And there you have a UCLA portrait of a coach people want at Tennessee?
Full disclosure, I know Markel and her sister who played at Pitt well enough to tell you that she was not the most coachable or easy player to motivate. I'm also a UCONN fan not advocating for Nikki to go to TN . Just want to set the record straight on Nikki time at UCLA.
Couple of observations: If your contention was that Nikki finished 4th in the conference " with Kathy Oliver's players" hopefully you realize that was the lowest Nikki finished in the conference in her 3 years at UCLA.
I didn't miss the part where you said she was an "excellent x's and o's coach". I was responding to the things like you calling her a poor administrator and arrogant personality -sounds unrelated to basketball.
Cori Close missed the NCAA tournament in 3 of her first 4 years at UCLA. But that WNIT championship in 2015 looms pretty large though for UCLA.
I'll take the bait. For a long time I bit my tongue during the period of postmortem hagiography following Pat's untimely passing, but no longer:
Just as Summitt created the Lady Vols program and legacy, she also created women’s basketball as an NCAA sport.Seriously? "Created women's basketball as an NCAA sport"?! As Bill Walton would say: "Please!" Women's basketball became an NCAA sport because the NCAA (under pressure, of course) decided to sanction women's basketball in the early 1980s. Not because Pat waved her magic wand or sternly glared at somebody.
As a result, UT is more conscious of its women’s basketball program than almost any other school. Sure…some UConn fan will question everything I just said, but if they know anything about the sport at all, then they know their arguments are lies. Without Pat, there’s no Geno…there’s no Tara.
Again, I can't stomach this strain of hyperbole. Pat was in many ways a pioneer and a towering figure in the sport. But there were in fact other coaches, and other basketball programs, that achieved excellence both before and during her heyday. Geno and Tara were both on their way to building great success before Pat ever won her first national championship at Tennessee. To say they would've been nothing without Pat is not only dishonest, it's insulting.
The Tennessee fans' angst is of course understandable, but enough already with the self-serving fairy tales.
As I have said before, there is one possible candidate who stands out in my mind as the logical (and good) choice to succeed Holly: Shea Ralph!
Because the world (specifically including the LV fanbase and the Utenn administration) is not logical, it won't happen, but it should.
I think the words self serving and self righteous applies the the article in question. But also note that those who walk around with UT blinders are mostly calling for Holly's Head. In Game of Thrones Varys says to Littlefinger at one point, "...and who doesn't like to see their friends fail now and then". GRR Martin however says nothing about those who we find repulsive. For the failure of those we rejoice.I'll take the bait. For a long time I bit my tongue during the period of postmortem hagiography following Pat's untimely passing, but no longer:
Just as Summitt created the Lady Vols program and legacy, she also created women’s basketball as an NCAA sport.Seriously? "Created women's basketball as an NCAA sport"?! As Bill Walton would say: "Please!" Women's basketball became an NCAA sport because the NCAA (under pressure, of course) decided to sanction women's basketball in the early 1980s. Not because Pat waved her magic wand or sternly glared at somebody.
As a result, UT is more conscious of its women’s basketball program than almost any other school. Sure…some UConn fan will question everything I just said, but if they know anything about the sport at all, then they know their arguments are lies. Without Pat, there’s no Geno…there’s no Tara.
Again, I can't stomach this strain of hyperbole. Pat was in many ways a pioneer and a towering figure in the sport. But there were in fact other coaches, and other basketball programs, that achieved excellence both before and during her heyday. Geno and Tara were both on their way to building great success before Pat ever won her first national championship at Tennessee. To say they would've been nothing without Pat is not only dishonest, it's insulting.
The Tennessee fans' angst is of course understandable, but enough already with the self-serving fairy tales.
Debbie Ryan at Virginia, Geno’s mentor, was also a giant of her day. Tenn couldn’t become a great team in a vacuum, it needed a foil and Virginia, along with La Tech, USC, Old Dominion, and Texas provided one. So, no, PHS didn’t create the sport and Geno would have been fine without the LVs.I'll take the bait. For a long time I bit my tongue during the period of postmortem hagiography following Pat's untimely passing, but no longer:
Just as Summitt created the Lady Vols program and legacy, she also created women’s basketball as an NCAA sport.Seriously? "Created women's basketball as an NCAA sport"?! As Bill Walton would say: "Please!" Women's basketball became an NCAA sport because the NCAA (under pressure, of course) decided to sanction women's basketball in the early 1980s. Not because Pat waved her magic wand or sternly glared at somebody.
As a result, UT is more conscious of its women’s basketball program than almost any other school. Sure…some UConn fan will question everything I just said, but if they know anything about the sport at all, then they know their arguments are lies. Without Pat, there’s no Geno…there’s no Tara.
Again, I can't stomach this strain of hyperbole. Pat was in many ways a pioneer and a towering figure in the sport. But there were in fact other coaches, and other basketball programs, that achieved excellence both before and during her heyday. Geno and Tara were both on their way to building great success before Pat ever won her first national championship at Tennessee. To say they would've been nothing without Pat is not only dishonest, it's insulting.
The Tennessee fans' angst is of course understandable, but enough already with the self-serving fairy tales.
Great points - but let’s not forget that all these young ladies chose to play for Holly!If I were a neutral observer (I'm not), the biggest thing that would bother me about Holly is that she simply wastes a lot of the top talent that comes through Tennessee. If you look at top recruits who were almost exclusively coached by Holly (2011 class-present), the lack of player development and results is just awful:
Ariel Massengale-#3 recruit in 2011, never became an AA or WNBA player. Had a couple of solid seasons at UT.
Cierra Burdick-#4 recruit in 2011, never found success in the WNBA or became and AA.
Bashaara Graves-#5 recruit in 2012, SEC FOY and took home a NFOY award. People on this board were saying she was better than any of UCONN's freshman trio of Stewart, Tuck and Jefferson. Regressed as her career continued, became a 2nd round draft pick and played a couple of years as a deep bench player.
Mercedes Russell-#1 recruit in 2013. Never made AA and was a late 2nd round draft pick in the WNBA. Bench player as a rookie.
Diamond Deshields-#3 recruit in 2013. Played 2 years for Holly and never became an All-American after winning NFOY honors at North Carolina. Left Tennessee on bad terms, bolting to play overseas before becoming the #3 draft pick and having a good rookie season.
Jaime Nared-#6 recruit in 2014. Never became an AA and was a 2nd round draft pick in the WNBA.
Te'a Cooper-#12 recruit in 2015. Played one year and struggled, sat out a year injured and then was kicked off the team. Now is a top player and leading scorer for a top 15 team in South Carolina.
Anastasia Hayes-#7 recruit in 2017. Played 1 year and did an okay job, kicked off team. Transferred to MTSU.
Evina Westbrook-#2 recruit in 2017. Has had a good sophomore year but team is at an all-time low and at risk of not making the tournament.
Rennia Davis-#12 recruit in 2017. Had a good freshman season but has been underwhelming as a sophomore. Team at risk of not making tournament.
Zaay Green-#10 recruit in 2018. Having a good freshman season so far.
Literally not one player has developed into an All-American or even a standout on the national level. No one improves under Holly or comes close to reaching her potential. No one becomes a WNBA caliber player under her tutelage. I'd rather see these players play for coaches who will develop them and improve the sport than waste their talent.
Great points - but let’s not forget that all these young ladies chose to play for Holly!
Thanks for the correction.Graves, Massengale and Burdick picked Tennessee when Pat was coaching. The others don't have that excuse though.