As always, the bracket begins to firm up around now, not so many absurd positions on it. The only dubious ones for me on this iteration are Va Tech and LSU. In my thinking, it's pretty much a toss up between Va Tech and UCLA for that #2 seed, and either NC St or Oregon could be slotted above LSU. I'm not entirely convinced about Utah as a #3 above Kansas, but I can imagine a case for that one. Same for UNC over Iowa -- I can picture Iowa defeating UNC pretty handily, but I can also imagine UNC winning a close one over them.Weak sauce this week. Michigan back in, UConn & UNC change places.
View attachment 82380
Updated today. I guess St John’s is the automatic qualifier from the Big East? Interesting choice
Proof that zero thought goes into the analysis, I guess. People should take these things with a grain of saltBig East website lists St. John’s in first place and UConn as second.
His AQ is the team that is in first place at the time of the release. If you look at all of the AQ they are currently in first or tied for first in their conference.Proof that zero thought goes into the analysis, I guess. People should take these things with a grain of salt
Hence my point. He’s not thinking about who should actually win, just who’s leading the conference in December, before conference play truly gets underway. As I said, zero thought.His AQ is the team that is in first place at the time of the release. If you look at all of the AQ they are currently in first or tied for first in their conference.
Hence my point. He’s not thinking about who should actually win, just who’s leading the conference in December, before conference play truly gets underway. As I said, zero thought.
I think @zero thought” is Charlie’s point. Don’t think; don’t forecast the future. just put them in the position they occupy NOW. It will all work out during conference play. For every conference.
I’m excited about the Big Ten & ACC conference races. I think the Big East conference race will be interesting too. Indeed, all the P-6 races will be of some interest.
There is a thread called Who can beat South Carolina on the General Womens bball boardWho do you see making it interesting for SCar? I see 3 ranked teams right now and Arkansas is barely hanging on while LSU should be ranked No 1 in DII for their level of competition?
The SEC this year is looking like the AAC when UConn was in it. (Not nearly that bad but lacking much mystery about who will win it)
No slight intended to you, @visitingcock. The passage you quoted practically made my head spin. Is Creme a professional writer? I mean, does he make a living with a pen? "One piece of criteria"????? I come from a family of journalists and writers, and my DNA practically revolts against this phrasing. Aaaarrrrgggghhhh!!!The straight NET rating is one piece of criteria
so basically Charlie is ignoring his own words here.Best thing Creme has written so far:
.......... "This is the time of year when Bracketology takes on a more analytical slant, rather than being quite so speculative. The NET (NCAA Evaluation Tool) ratings are the foundation for that analysis.
.......... As is said every year with NET -- or the RPI before it -- these ratings aren't the end-all, be-all. The straight NET rating is one piece of criteria. It's also the foundation for others such as significant wins, strength of schedule, strength of conference and bad losses. The NET is a formula that includes offensive and defensive efficiency, wins and losses, the strength of the opponent played and the location of the game. It's more inclusive than the RPI because it includes the efficiency portions (how a team played) in addition to the results. The pure NET ranking of a team won't strictly determine its seed, but these will be the ratings to watch the rest of the season. The more time goes by, the more important they become."
SCar was the number five NET ranked team at the end of the 2021 conference tournaments but was a number one seed by the committee due to SOS (and maybe quality of losses that year.) I think the same rationale would apply to UConn this year.
Deep breath one and all... close your eyes and repeat after me...so
so basically Charlie is ignoring his own words here.
#1. UConn is #4 in NET
#2. UConn is #1 in SOS
#3. He has them playing Stanford which anyone with an ounce of logic would have Stanford as the overall #2 seed and even if UConn became a #2, they should be playing the 4th best #1 seed who would be tOSU.
I am not a conspiracy theory guy but yee gads, the number of ESPN scribes who want disrespect on UConn continues. Every year, Geno et al prove them wrong time and time again so it is again this year....
It seems to be a growth industry!maybe there is a bonus clause for the number of UCONN fans he can get riled up.
Huh? I see both as 2 seeds.Latest Creme Bracketology Places LSU as #2 Seed, UConn a #3
Didn’t look at the article, I just copied it down the title of this threadHuh? I see both as 2 seeds.
Didn’t look at the article, I just copied it down the title of this thread