Latest (2/12) Bracketology

Discussion in 'UConn Women's Basketball' started by Centerstream, Feb 12, 2018.

  1. LOTRADER

    LOTRADER

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2017
    Messages:
    155
    Likes Received:
    104
    Agree, a stretch, but UCLA is a lot better than I originally thought. If they get through the Oregon schools this weekend with victories in both, that may be enough! Of course, being an OSU graduate and superfan, I hope we wreck that plan Friday night in Corvallis.
     
  2. FridaFriend

    FridaFriend

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2018
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    10
    I have several objections to the way in which the bracket is drawn. First, I think that a conference should not be given more than one #1 seed. The ACC champion should get the #1 and Baylor should get the fourth #1 seed. Either Louisville or Notre Dame should get a #2 along with Oregon, Texas, and South Carolina. I would go with UCLA and Maryland as #3 seeds, but I think Tennessee and Florida State are weak choices. Tennessee gave up 99 points to Marquette, lost to LSU, and only beat Wichita State by 12. Florida State defeated such powerhouse teams as Florida, Iowa, ASU, and Creighton and lost to Texas. I think that none of the #4 seeds have earned the seeding. The non-conference records for the four teams are not impressive. NC State defeated Alabama, Tulane, Georgetown, and Vanderbilt, but lost to Rutgers. Stanford has lost 8 games including twice to Ohio State. Georgia defeated Virginia and Georgia Tech (barely) and lost big to Texas. Missouri defeated Cal, Kansas State, Indiana, Xavier, and Illinois.

    I have focused only on the #1 through #4 seeds because they have home court advantage through the first two rounds. This leads to my second objection, that these 16 spots are owned by UCONN (justifiably) and 15 P5 conference teams. I would prefer to give each P5 conference 2 slots and for one for UCONN. That leaves five for teams like DePaul, Green Bay, FGCU, Central Michigan, and a South Dakota team. I know it won't happen, because the P5 conferences have a lock on the home court, but it could make a few upsets more likely. I also think that it would be much more fair to spread the home court around.

    Finally, I wanted to compare several conferences based on the composite non-conference records of conference members. I looked at the P5 conferences, the Big East, and the AAC only considering games between those seven conferences. Not surprisingly, the ACC and the SEC had the best win-lost records: 41-29 and 39-29 respectively. The Big 10 and Big 12 were next at 31-32 and 21-19. The Pac 12 and Big East were weak at 16-24 and 17-21. The Pac 12 teams scheduled the fewest games against other P5 conferences, the Big East and the AAC. Oregon State, Utah, USC, and Colorado only scheduled two games each and Arizona only one game. The AAC was 18-29 or 7-29 without UCONN wins. Based on this I would say that the Big 12 deserves more recognition and the Pac 12 much less.
     
    BearlyNose likes this.
  3. Plebe

    Plebe

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2016
    Messages:
    4,675
    Likes Received:
    6,240
    Really? So you think that UConn in 2013 should have been a #2 seed?

    Teams are selected and seeded on an individual basis. I'm not sure why people think conferences should be apportioned seats as if it were the House of Representatives.

    The Pac-12 teams are geographically isolated from all of the other conferences you included, and it's not necessarily easy for them to find East Coast teams who want to travel west as part of a home-and-home. The per-conference game totals you cite are also skewed by two other facts: (a) the other four P5 conferences are forced to play in the conference "challenges," thus inflating the number of inter-P5 games they play; (b) the Pac-12 has fewer teams than the other P5 conferences except the Big 12.
     
    Last edited: Feb 14, 2018 at 3:43 AM
  4. nwhoopfan

    nwhoopfan

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2017
    Messages:
    3,609
    Likes Received:
    2,914
    Since you like to point out constantly that UCLA beat Baylor w/out Mulkey and Cox and thus it doesn't really count, Baylor's victory over Stanford also doesn't really count because their leading scorer McPhee was out w/ an injury. I'm fairly sure Baylor still would've beaten Stanford if McPhee had played, but she didn't and I'm just using your rules.
     
    MSGRET likes this.
  5. nwhoopfan

    nwhoopfan

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2017
    Messages:
    3,609
    Likes Received:
    2,914
    I was fairly stunned when Stanford won in Corvallis and Eugene. I will be even more stunned if UCLA pulls off the road sweep in Oregon.
     
  6. DallasBUFan

    DallasBUFan

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2017
    Messages:
    132
    Likes Received:
    78
    They still had their head coach though....
     
  7. PAHuskeyFan

    PAHuskeyFan

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2017
    Messages:
    472
    Likes Received:
    796
    Does the committee look at the games and who played or didn't, or that Coach was away? I really don't think so, I think they look at wins and losses.... and go from there.
     
  8. Plebe

    Plebe

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2016
    Messages:
    4,675
    Likes Received:
    6,240
    Actually they do (or at least can) consider availability of personnel.

    The following page from the NCAA website lists "availability of talent" as one of the criteria considered by the committee:
    Women's Basketball Selections 101 - Selections
     
    jaundicedeye and PAHuskeyFan like this.
  9. PAHuskeyFan

    PAHuskeyFan

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2017
    Messages:
    472
    Likes Received:
    796
    Wow... very interesting.
     
    jaundicedeye likes this.
  10. DallasBUFan

    DallasBUFan

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2017
    Messages:
    132
    Likes Received:
    78
    I think it's quite fair and nice that they do.

    Sometimes cards are stacked against these kids and they some way find a way to make it happen.
     
  11. Fightin Choke

    Fightin Choke Golden Dome Fan

    Joined:
    May 10, 2012
    Messages:
    1,009
    Likes Received:
    1,094
    This is always confusing to people but at the top of Charlie's bracket, it reads "Note: Regions not reflective of Final Four pairings".

    That means that he is not attempting to assign which bracket winners face other bracket winners. Thus you cannot assume that UConn would only have to worry about Louisville being in UConn's bracket. (Maybe Louisville from the Lexington bracket would face Kansas City winner and UConn would face the Spokane winner, for example.)
     
    oldude and CocoHusky like this.
  12. Fightin Choke

    Fightin Choke Golden Dome Fan

    Joined:
    May 10, 2012
    Messages:
    1,009
    Likes Received:
    1,094
    I think a lot of Baylor folks feel that way, but how well has Mulkey done against Muffet since Griner graduated? I know Baylor has height on Notre Dame (and every team except the one in Starkville), but Muffet is a great strategist. It's the same reason why I hope Notre Dame avoids Stanford this year.
     
    jaundicedeye likes this.
  13. oldude

    oldude bamboo lover

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2016
    Messages:
    4,342
    Likes Received:
    11,449
    That’s correct. The committee tries to keep the four #1 regional seeds as close to home as possible. Hence UConn is a lock for Albany. But with UConn the overall #1 seed, if the favorites all advanced, the Huskies would face the overall #4 seed, whichever region that seed came from.
     
    Scoop likes this.
  14. Fightin Choke

    Fightin Choke Golden Dome Fan

    Joined:
    May 10, 2012
    Messages:
    1,009
    Likes Received:
    1,094
    I agree with your point, but none of the games you mentioned were finals. In 2011, Texas A&M beat Baylor in the Elite 8 after losing the first 3 meetings. In the same year, Notre Dame beat UConn in the Final Four after losing the first 3 meetings. In 2013, UConn returned the favor; in the Final Four, UConn beat Notre Dame after falling to them the first 3 times they met that season.
     
    bbfanLA likes this.
  15. Fightin Choke

    Fightin Choke Golden Dome Fan

    Joined:
    May 10, 2012
    Messages:
    1,009
    Likes Received:
    1,094
    But at the time of your post, wouldn't that have been Notre Dame (Spokane) and not Louisville who faced UConn in the Final Four? I thought you interpreted the bracket as if the brackets on the left met in the FF (and the teams that won the right 2 brackets met in the other FF game). That is, of course, the way it works when the actual bracket is published, but Charlie is intentionally not predicting that (for whatever reason).
     
    Scoop likes this.
  16. Bigboote

    Bigboote Lectroid feom Planet 10

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2016
    Messages:
    921
    Likes Received:
    1,228
    Thanks, mon.
     
  17. Fightin Choke

    Fightin Choke Golden Dome Fan

    Joined:
    May 10, 2012
    Messages:
    1,009
    Likes Received:
    1,094
    Why are you skeptical? Is it that you do not believe that their resume is presently sufficient for a 1-seed? Or that you think Louisville will beat them in the ACC tournament? The tournament committee has downgraded teams because of injuries (which is why sometimes teams hide injuries or lie about their severity as we approach March), but Notre Dame has arguably played their best ball of the season after they adjusted from their last personnel loss (Lili Thompson). Sure the adjustment came after getting stomped at Louisville, but I'm sure that ND is excited for that rematch.
     
  18. oldude

    oldude bamboo lover

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2016
    Messages:
    4,342
    Likes Received:
    11,449
    I probably did not look very closely at the brackets. My working assumption is that the overall seeding will eventually have UConn #1, MS St #2, Baylor #3 and either ND or Louisville #4. Of course the ACC champion could well displace Baylor, but again my working assumption is that if Baylor wins out they will get the #3 overall seed.
     
    Fightin Choke likes this.
  19. Fightin Choke

    Fightin Choke Golden Dome Fan

    Joined:
    May 10, 2012
    Messages:
    1,009
    Likes Received:
    1,094
    There are a few points that I believe require consideration here. First, the reason they use the RPI and not Massey or Sagarin is because they do not want margin of victory (MOV) included in the ranking they use, as it would encourage teams to run up scores. Thus we need to use rankings such as RPI or ELO Chess that ignore MOV. I guess you could argue whether or not that's a sound reason, but as of now, that is the methodology employed. Baylor is currently 5th in RPI and 4th in ELO Chess while MOV ratings hold them in the highest regard (Massey 2nd, Sagarin 2nd).

    Second, Mulkey KNOWS that they use the RPI and that they will penalize you if you play too many hopelessly overmatched teams (cf Maryland 206-17), but she scheduled her murders' row of Lilliputians anyway. Why? Possibly because teams that were ranked a bit higher can request home-and-homes instead of just playing in Waco. Which leads to...

    ...Third, Baylor will have played 16/29 (55%) games at home this season (11 road 38%, 2 neutral 7%). Miss. St. is similarly bad: 55%, 31% 17%, as is Louisville: 55%, 45%, 0%. . In contrast UConn's numbers are 41%, 45%, 14%. Notre Dame is 45%, 45%, 10%. Creating a quick metric by adding the % home game to .5 x % neutral games, here are the "most homey" schedules of the top 16 teams in RPI (listed by how homey their schedule is):
    61.7 Miss. St.
    58.6 Baylor
    58.6 Duke
    58.1 Oregon
    56.9 Tennessee
    56.9 Mizzou
    55.2 UCLA
    55.2 Texas
    55.0 Ohio St.
    54.8 Louisville
    53.4 Maryland
    53.3 Stanford
    50.0 Notre Dame
    50.0 Green Bay
    48.3 UConn
    48.3 Florida St.

    This is one list where you wanted to be ranked low, as it means that you play more games in hostile locations. So not only does Baylor have one of the most home dominant schedules of the top teams, but they also play a lot of very bad teams (see point 2 above). That's a double whammy.

    Fourth, even if you argue that only games against top teams matter (as you do), Baylor has played fewer top 50 teams than the other top contenders.
    Top 50 opponents (counts all games schedule in regular season)
    16 Notre Dame
    15 Stanford
    15 Oregon
    15 UCLA
    14 UConn
    13 Louisville
    13 Tennessee
    12 Ohio St.
    12 Miss St.
    12 Florida St.
    11 Duke
    11 Texas
    10 Maryland
    9 Mizzou
    8 Baylor
    5 Green Bay

    The eye test suggests that Baylor is excellent, and woe is the team to have them as their 2-seed (if the Baylor fails to be awarded a 1-seed). But didn't many people feel that way about Maryland last season and that didn't work out well for Maryland. I would be disappointed to have Baylor as Notre Dame's 2-seed, but I still think that the Irish could beat them.
     
    jaundicedeye and oldude like this.
  20. Golden Husky

    Golden Husky The Midas Touch

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2017
    Messages:
    466
    Likes Received:
    941
    This makes sense to me. ..which probably means we're both off our meds again, Dude.
     
    jaundicedeye and oldude like this.
  21. PAHuskeyFan

    PAHuskeyFan

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2017
    Messages:
    472
    Likes Received:
    796
    Sure is a lot of discussion about a Bracket that means VERY LITTLE. Charlie Creame's Bracketology is accomplishing what it's designed to do I suppose...get people to talk about his "projection"... As we have seen year after year, Charlie's brackets do not really match up with what the NCAA Women's Basketball Tournament Committee will do in their final seedings. And, Charlie has not followed some of the basic "rules" the committee follows... such as Teams from the same conference are never (??) put in the same bracket unless there are more than 4 teams from a conference that make the tournament, thus it's impossible to not have more than one. For example...even if the "S" curve seeding would put USF in UConn's bracket, if they are the only 2, or 2 of 3 AAC teams in the tournament, the Committee would change USF with another similar seeded team (i.e., a 6 seed for a 6 seed) so that they wouldn't see each other until the final 4.

    I don't get too excited about Charlie's brackets as they really don't mean much in the end.
     
    jaundicedeye, LOTRADER and oldude like this.
  22. Fightin Choke

    Fightin Choke Golden Dome Fan

    Joined:
    May 10, 2012
    Messages:
    1,009
    Likes Received:
    1,094
    Charlie is not wrong to place USF in UConn's bracket, as he is partially going off recent history. In both the 2015 and 2016 NCAA tournaments, USF has been placed in UConn's bracket (see 2015 and 2016).

    Charlie doesn't know too much about women's basketball, but he really does understand NCAA bracketing principles. But he has trouble projecting the bracket because the committee changes which rules they follow. Sometimes it's because there are conflicting rules, and sometimes it's because they come up with a different S-curve than him. He analyzes their projections (the reveals) because it tells him how this particular seeding committee evaluates data, which should improve his brackets. He honestly doesn't do too bad, as his final bracket is usually fairly close. Now his early brackets are sort of ridiculous, but at least they get us talking.
     
    jaundicedeye and oldude like this.
  23. DallasBUFan

    DallasBUFan

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2017
    Messages:
    132
    Likes Received:
    78
    I'm shocked we only have 1 loss. This was truly going to be a rebuilding year and the fact that we could be a top 8 seed, I'm cool with it. Young and lack of depth. These girls may very well be playing better than last years squad. They all seem to work together better.

    I want ND and I don't care who is no.1 or no.2. Neither have depth, they history of beating each other in the finals, and I feel the best about beating them. However, I felt that way about Oregon State and we see how that turned out.

    So what happens if Miss State loses? Their schedule is similar to BUs other than conference being stronger. Do they drop to a 4 seed?
     
  24. Bear11

    Bear11

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2017
    Messages:
    25
    Likes Received:
    21
    I realize that Baylor hasn't played quite as difficult a schedule as some of the top teams. My point is that the arbitrary and archaic RPI makes Baylor and the entire Big 12 look worse than they really are. I do think Baylor and Notre Dame would be an intriguing matchup that could go either way.
     
  25. Plebe

    Plebe

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2016
    Messages:
    4,675
    Likes Received:
    6,240
    You think Mississippi St would drop from #2 overall to outside the top 12 after just one loss?