- Joined
- Nov 20, 2011
- Messages
- 2,718
- Reaction Score
- 7,094
I agree that they will get some top recruits, just fewer. And, unless the new coach is spectacular, the numbers will diminish rapidly. UCLA after Wooden is an example.You may not like the question, but it's a valid one. Do people go to Tennessee to be coached by Pat or by the history that Pat created at Tennessee. I think we will find out starting with the 2013 class. Personally, I think they still get their share of top recruits.
I think most would agree that many players went to TN mainly to experience Pat, and that the University itself had little to do with it. I’d give more credit to the school as an attraction if it had high academic standards like Stanford, a great location close to a major city, a beautiful campus, or a location near major recreation areas, etc. Coaches like Pat, Geno and a few others create such an advantage for their schools that all other considerations fall to the wayside for the top recruits. Losing an elite coach gives competing schools a better shot at acquiring the best players. It doesn’t take much to start the slide to oblivion.