I think Wallace is a great kid, and I'm sick about the fate that has befallen her. I'd love to see her back to form for the NCAA tourney. Having said that, since this, inexplicably, has become a thread about Kim, I have trouble understanding what provokes all the animus against her. In the world of athletics, most of the featured players are hopelessly bland, and they give voice to such an interminable and stultifying train of cliches that they can induce sleep in the most confirmed insomniac. I have a son who can do a hilarious "shtick" on coaches' cliches that goes on for a good thirty minutes that drags them out ad nauseum. Kim, on the other hand, is endlessly entertaining, and she happens to be a helluva coach. Even my wife, whose knowledge of, and whose affinity for, sports hovers perpetually around the zero level will sit down to watch Kim, her antics, her clothing, and her footwear in particular. We need "characters" in sports to break the monotony. If they can do that and if they happen also to be pretty damn good at what they do, well, shouldn't we applaud that?