Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell. | Page 778 | The Boneyard

Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell.

Drew said:
I’m fascinated to see how this next go-round goes. The Big East is the perfect cheap filler content for a cable sports network- can stick it on FS1/FS2 without worrying about a conference network since they aren’t a big enough deal to have one, daily content in two time slots, and doesn’t cost you a lot of money.

They have to put SOMETHING on during December, Jan, Feb when their college football coverage ends, as long as the BE remains cheap enough to make $ on the ad revenue then it makes sense for FOX to continue the relationship in (relatively) its current format. The question becomes, when inevitably the BE asks for more money, does FOX say yes or do they say “we have other content that can also get 286k views nightly for a fraction of the cost” and walk away.
Expand ...
Yup
 
As long as the Big East keeps its visibility on linear TV and gets a small bump (to 5-6 million), I will be thrilled. Adding Gonzaga (and going to 22 league games) may be what's necessary to accelerate that bump.
 
Was the B12 dalliance the last gasp, or is there one more Hail Mary attempt coming for UConn athletics(NIL Collective)? Everyone posting seems to agree more or less that the piper is coming and if you can't afford to pay him, no more music. Trying to picture what the "party is over" scenario looks like if you aren't in one of the chairs when the music stops. Is it a larger, NE/Mid Atlantic version of a Yankee Conference? Don't have the time or imagination to go through that exercise. So.....

I'll just enjoy our Big East Huskies as they are today and Happy Thanksgiving to all Yarders.
 
Dream Jobbed 2.0 said:
That’s not the point
Expand ...
I think people are underestimating the Big East. We literally were just grandfathered into the new NIT structure with two auto bids, same as every other power league. There is respect for the Big East among the football power leagues. The only reason the Gavitt games is ending is because the Big Ten is going to 22 conference games. We have a challenge with the Big 12 in basketball. We (the Big East) can schedule home and home contests with P4 programs in basketball OOC.

Football is a different story, but the ACC schools respect us enough to schedule us H/H in that as well.
 
shizzle787 said:
It will be about who can opt in. If you are willing to opt in, and the big boys try to shut you out, that opens up an anti-trust lawsuit.

I firmly believe when revenue sharing comes into play that there will be about 90-100 FBS football schools that opt in and an additional 50-60 basketball-first schools that opt in.
Expand ...
There is no world in which the “final state” ends up with 100 FBS teams and another 60 non-football schools. Zero chance. The A5 isn’t leading a breakup of the existing governance structure so they can still have to accommodate Temple, Xavier, San Jose State and St. Joseph’s. You’re even dumber than I thought if you believe that to be the case.

It’s going to end with like 50 teams between the B1G and SEC splitting the vast majority of $ from the NCAA Tournament and CFP while everyone else gets the scraps.

They’re not going to stop playing teams outside of the P2 in the future- they’re just not going to give them any money for the “privilege” of playing with them. Which means UConn (and other schools) will have to find the $$ to make up the gap from boosters and other sources. That is the terrifying part- in 20 years is the $ gap so big that we can’t compete in player acquisition and retention if we’re not in a league with much more revenue than our current one? It’s probable.
 
You can already see the P6 gaining an advantage in moves affecting NIT basketball...and some mid major commissioners and coaches have squeaked.

Last week, the NIT board of managers announced that regular-season champions who do not win their conference tournaments and are not selected for the NCAA tournament will not receive an automatic bid to the NIT. Instead, the NIT will guarantee bids for two teams from each of the six power conferences as well as two spots for the top two teams in the NET rankings that were not selected for the NCAA tournament.
 
Drew said:
There is no world in which the “final state” ends up with 100 FBS teams and another 60 non-football schools. Zero chance. The A5 isn’t leading a breakup of the existing governance structure so they can still have to accommodate Temple, Xavier, San Jose State and St. Joseph’s. You’re even dumber than I thought if you believe that to be the case.

It’s going to end with like 50 teams between the B1G and SEC splitting the vast majority of $ from the NCAA Tournament and CFP while everyone else gets the scraps.

They’re not going to stop playing teams outside of the P2 in the future- they’re just not going to give them any money for the “privilege” of playing with them. Which means UConn (and other schools) will have to find the $$ to make up the gap from boosters and other sources. That is the terrifying part- in 20 years is the $ gap so big that we can’t compete in player acquisition and retention if we’re not in a league with much more revenue than our current one? It’s probable.
Expand ...
Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it. In the late 70s and early 80s there were about 60 or so schools in the CFA that tried to create Division 1-A. Some others were thrown in to fill in the numbers, but several leagues that didn't want to drop down but were pressured to do so ultimately fought stayed up (MAC and Big West). It's not as easy to shed schools as you think.

The NCAA literally just had a transformation committee whose main (unstated) goal of Greg Sankey was to shrink Division 1. It FAILED. 1 team left Division 1 (St. Thomas of Brooklyn).

Also, if you really think there will be no major college sports programs in New York state or New England (basically what you are suggesting because Syracuse and BC won't make the cut), you are insane. That is 10% of the US population that is just going to be shut out of major college athletics. LOL. No better way to kill your earning potential as an organization than by shutting out the wealthiest region in the country.

#1 These things don't move as fast as you think.

#2 Compromises are made. If anyone thinks there is going to be a clean break of 50 schools, again LOL. Yes, 40 or so schools (in the Big Ten and SEC) will be making significantly more, but they can't leave the NCAA due to the liability shield.

Who the final schools are left is anyone's guess, but I would bet my life it won't only be 50 schools.
 
billybud said:
You can already see the P6 gaining an advantage in moves affecting NIT basketball...and some mid major commissioners and coaches have squeaked.

Last week, the NIT board of managers announced that regular-season champions who do not win their conference tournaments and are not selected for the NCAA tournament will not receive an automatic bid to the NIT. Instead, the NIT will guarantee bids for two teams from each of the six power conferences as well as two spots for the top two teams in the NET rankings that were not selected for the NCAA tournament.
Expand ...
Aka including the Big East (P6).
 
Drew said:
To be honest- in no way shape or form do I see the state ponying up any money at all to support UConn football at the future state “power” level. They can’t even get money to run the program currently- the last HC had to pay an OC out of his own pocket and the current HC can’t afford to hire a DC with the existing budget. The basketball staff of 4 makes more money than the football staff of 11. Think about how hard that is to do from a sheer numbers standpoint. Then, on top of it, the coach is complaining publicly (and has been for weeks) that we have essentially zero donor support for NIL. There is no existing football NIL group to support UConn (although I am hearing rumblings this is finally in the works). Do you know how insane it is we still don’t have a dedicated football collective? The rules came out 3 years ago. It’s preposterous.

The state (and donor base) will absolutely pay through the nose to participate in what is “big time” college basketball. The question is- how much $ is that cost? Because if 20% of media deals are being rationed to basketball and teams in the B1G are taking 20% of their $100M/annual TV money and allocating a portion of that $20M to their players, that’s going to be really difficult to compete against factoring in the additional NIL money that will continue on top of these future revenue sharing payments to athletes.

We don’t even have the money to fix or rebuild our existing decrepit facilities and previously tried to go cheap out of paying the Kevin Ollie buyout because of the cost. I don’t know how much $ it will take to compete in future state high major basketball but there is a non-zero chance that (eventually) we are priced out if we don’t see a significant change in future revenues
Expand ...

Yes and no. I think the state will at least sustain the current level, which was increased when Mora was hired. We added a huge support staff that we had nothing of before which brought the program closer to modernity.

However private contributions MUST increase and I don’t think we have enough people who know how to do that on the scale football requires!

UConn fans have always looked to the state for money but on the stage of college sports; which is football, football and football. Private contributions are what fuels the machine.

Basketball is a small side dish and a much less complex and demanding projecting. For example the basketball team is the equivalent of one position group on the football team! Not being affiliated with a power conference isn’t a death sentence….

We don’t have lots big donors. But we do have a fanbase that we could potentially crowdsource from. So that is the strategy that must be executed.

UConn also needs Jim Mora to be a little more positive, get some more results on the field and tighten up his controllables to generate more momentum and reassure current givers and attract new ones.

When I look at where we are now. I am reminded why I preferred a steady hand like Al Golden who had a track record of success in fixing poorly performing programs with limited resources.
 
shizzle787 said:
I think people are underestimating the Big East. We literally were just grandfathered into the new NIT structure with two auto bids, same as every other power league. There is respect for the Big East among the football power leagues. The only reason the Gavitt games is ending is because the Big Ten is going to 22 conference games. We have a challenge with the Big 12 in basketball. We (the Big East) can schedule home and home contests with P4 programs in basketball OOC.

Football is a different story, but the ACC schools respect us enough to schedule us H/H in that as well.
Expand ...
They are planning and colluding as 4 conferences
 
ZooCougar said:
Yes and no. I think the state will at least sustain the current level, which was increased when Mora was hired. We added a huge support staff that we had nothing of before which brought the program closer to modernity.

However private contributions MUST increase and I don’t think we have enough people who know how to do that on the scale football requires!

UConn fans have always looked to the state for money but on the stage of college sports; which is football, football and football. Private contributions are what fuels the machine.

Basketball is a small side dish and a much less complex and demanding projecting. For example the basketball team is the equivalent of one position group on the football team! Not being affiliated with a power conference isn’t a death sentence….

We don’t have lots big donors. But we do have a fanbase that we could potentially crowdsource from. So that is the strategy that must be executed.

UConn also needs Jim Mora to be a little more positive, get some more results on the field and tighten up his controllables to generate more momentum and reassure current givers and attract new ones.

When I look at where we are now. I am reminded why I preferred a steady hand like Al Golden who had a track record of success in fixing poorly performing programs with limited resources.
Expand ...
Al Golden didn’t operate in todays transfer portal world or the NIL world.
 
CTBballfan243 said:
Al Golden didn’t operate in todays transfer portal world or the NIL world.
Expand ...

And nether did Mora. And neither had really anyone else when were hiring two years ago. I don’t dislike Mora but Golden has at least done the closest thing to it and wasn’t like 75 years old.
 
shizzle787 said:
I think people are underestimating the Big East. We literally were just grandfathered into the new NIT structure with two auto bids, same as every other power league. There is respect for the Big East among the football power leagues. The only reason the Gavitt games is ending is because the Big Ten is going to 22 conference games. We have a challenge with the Big 12 in basketball. We (the Big East) can schedule home and home contests with P4 programs in basketball OOC.

Football is a different story, but the ACC schools respect us enough to schedule us H/H in that as well.
Expand ...
You are correct.

The B1G saw more value in playing additional conference games rather than play the Gavitt games and FOX apparently agreed.

Yet somehow you don’t see this as a negative
 
bobbyinaz said:
You are correct.

The B1G saw more value in playing additional conference games rather than play the Gavitt games and FOX apparently agreed.

Yet somehow you don’t see this as a negative
Expand ...
The B1G had no choice. Their decision to add USC, UCLA, Oregon and UW had nothing to do with “screw the Gavitt Games” it was all about football. This was just collateral damage.
 
bobbyinaz said:
You are correct.

The B1G saw more value in playing additional conference games rather than play the Gavitt games and FOX apparently agreed.

Yet somehow you don’t see this as a negative
Expand ...
They have 18 teams. They wanted to have more matchups against everybody in the league.
 
Drew said:
To be honest- in no way shape or form do I see the state ponying up any money at all to support UConn football at the future state “power” level. They can’t even get money to run the program currently- the last HC had to pay an OC out of his own pocket and the current HC can’t afford to hire a DC with the existing budget. The basketball staff of 4 makes more money than the football staff of 11. Think about how hard that is to do from a sheer numbers standpoint. Then, on top of it, the coach is complaining publicly (and has been for weeks) that we have essentially zero donor support for NIL. There is no existing football NIL group to support UConn (although I am hearing rumblings this is finally in the works). Do you know how insane it is we still don’t have a dedicated football collective? The rules came out 3 years ago. It’s preposterous.

The state (and donor base) will absolutely pay through the nose to participate in what is “big time” college basketball. The question is- how much $ is that cost? Because if 20% of media deals are being rationed to basketball and teams in the B1G are taking 20% of their $100M/annual TV money and allocating a portion of that $20M to their players, that’s going to be really difficult to compete against factoring in the additional NIL money that will continue on top of these future revenue sharing payments to athletes.

We don’t even have the money to fix or rebuild our existing decrepit facilities and previously tried to go cheap out of paying the Kevin Ollie buyout because of the cost. I don’t know how much $ it will take to compete in future state high major basketball but there is a non-zero chance that (eventually) we are priced out if we don’t see a significant change in future revenues
Expand ...
We don't have a DC because Mora fell out with his choice and then felt he could handle it. The money was there as soon as Spanos got a new job. Our facilities are far from decrepit, they are P5 level. Heck a lot of P5 schools don't have indoor facilities.

For basketball, I'll just point to the fact that we got the best player of a big ten team to transfer to us as proof that we are able to compete with other power conferences.
 
bobbyinaz said:
And FOX just stretched its budget by paying for a piece of the B12 expansion & is paying for most of the Oregon Washington move to the B1G.

How much money do they have left to spend in college sports?
Expand ...
Most of the big 10 games will be on the big ten network. The big 12 games they got will replace the PAC 12 games they are losing. Fox still needs the big east to fill their early slots.
 
How Sway?! said:
Most of the big 10 games will be on the big ten network. The big 12 games they got will replace the PAC 12 games they are losing. Fox still needs the big east to fill their early slots.
Expand ...
I have gone through the math multiple times on here, but it just doesn't sink in. The vast majority of Big 10, SEC, and ACC basketball games are shown on their conference networks. I have gone through all of the conferences and FOX lost the Pac 12 and will gain some Big 12 (# of games not determined yet) and if they lost BE basketball content it would create a big hole in their college basketball content. FOX has 1 potential conference tournament for the rest of this decade, the Big East.

As for ratings on FOX/FS1 comparing the Big 10 and Big East, it's comparing apples and oranges. Virtually ALL of the Big East games are on FOX/FS1/FS2 so you are going to have plenty of bad matchups. Virtually NONE of the Big 10 bad matchups are shown on FOX/FS1, they are shown on BTN. If you want to compare the ratings, take the ~30 Big 10 games shown on FOX/FS1 and compare them to the top 30 Big East games shown on FOX/FS1.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Online statistics

Members online
251
Guests online
1,578
Total visitors
1,829
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Share This Page

Forum statistics

Threads
164,068
Messages
4,380,885
Members
10,177
Latest member
silver fox


.
..
Top Bottom