Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell. | Page 524 | The Boneyard

Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell.

If your initial statement is true, why bother?
B1G has already moved past 16. Only a matter of time until XII and SEC do the same. ACC is still only at 14 (+1). Is the ACC supposed to sit around waiting to be poached?
 
B1G has already moved past 16. Only a matter of time until XII and SEC do the same. ACC is still only at 14 (+1). Is the ACC supposed to sit around waiting to be poached?
They'll wait for the Texas schools and Kansas if they were smart. Alas.
 
In that same spirit none of this is important then.
It’s clear I don’t post much so the “winning the internet” is just ridiculous.
Disagree, I find the placement or not of Connecticut in a P5 conference enormously important, it's just the need to disprove random posters that I find meaningless.
 
On Twitter, most of the B12 fans who hated the idea of UConn are right now butt hurt by the Pac12 meeting this morning, and they're telling ASU/UTah to go to hell.

This comes from the meaningless-tweets-department
 
.-.
Catch up. That’s not a given anymore.

And from the Big 12s POV we aren’t preferable to UA, ASU and Utah.
, why the snark?

You said the BigXII was choosing to kill the PAC instead of taking us.

I'm saying they could take us and still kill the PAC. I'm still hopeful for an invitation, although it doesn't look great.

We will all "catch up" when there are official announcements.
 
B1G has already moved past 16. Only a matter of time until XII and SEC do the same. ACC is still only at 14 (+1). Is the ACC supposed to sit around waiting to be poached?
If everyone else has ceded the East Coast to them, then there is zero need to further divide the pie. That said, particularly with the ACC, they'll do whatever ESPN tells them to do as long as ESPN is willing to back it with cash.
 
.-.
Do they prefer associating with Fresno, Boise, and Wyoming?

It’s one or the other.
Unless they want to drop to the WCC.
I am trying to picture Baylor and Texas Tech playing at Stanford. Better yet, Cincy, UCF, or WVU.

If UCONN is located in the West, we would have been in the PAC-12 a long time ago.
 
Do they prefer associating with Fresno, Boise, and Wyoming?

It’s one or the other.
Unless they want to drop to the WCC.
That’s the alternative.

Yormark and the B12 are salivating at this situation.

And yes I’m still positive they want and need an eastern presence that is the best bb program so UConn will still get an invite.
 
.-.
On Twitter, most of the B12 fans who hated the idea of UConn are right now butt hurt by the Pac12 meeting this morning, and they're telling ASU/UTah to go to hell.

This comes from the meaningless-tweets-department

My irrational UConn centric desire is for Yormark to get the UConn deal done and make the others have a cage fight for the remaining slots.
 
Is it possible that, with the opportunity to add Stanford, the XII goes to 18, taking all 4 corner schools plus Stanford and us? Or does that require too much of Fox and ESPN?

Still assuming we're out, but just wondering how hard a ceiling 16 is.
one would think that with the big ten going to 18, SEC and B12 would try to follow suit, but who knows.
 
It's amazing how much credence people here put on Internet tweets or news stories. The people who know are under CDA and not talking, the people who are talking are guessing. In the end things will go the way that makes financial sense, and assuming the B1G stops at Oregon and Washington, who is more valuable than UConn? Arizona, Stanford, Colorado, maybe Cal ... and no one else. UConn is way more valuable than Utah or Arizona State (as the second teams from their states), especially if the B12 foresees NCAA basketball shifting toward the football model and revenue going to the revenue producers.

GoKU is the most plausible poster because the scenario he's been describing is business-rational. Let's just wait for all the behind-the-scenes work to get done, and it will probably be a good outcome for Huskies.
 
Last edited:
Is it possible that, with the opportunity to add Stanford, the XII goes to 18, taking all 4 corner schools plus Stanford and us? Or does that require too much of Fox and ESPN?

Still assuming we're out, but just wondering how hard a ceiling 16 is.
I mean, it’d be Cal and Stanford
 
.-.
It's amazing how much credence people here put on Internet tweets or news stories. The people who know are under CDA and not talking, the people who are talking are guessing. In the end things will go the way that makes financial sense, and assuming the B1G stops at Oregon and Washington, who is more valuable than UConn? Arizona, Stanford, Colorado ... and no one else. UConn is way more valuable than Utah or Arizona State (as the second teams from their states), especially if the B12 foresees NCAA basketball shifting toward the football model and revenue going to the revenue producers.

GoKU is the most plausible poster because the scenario he's been describing is business-rational. Let's just wait for all the behind-the-scenes work to get done, and it will probably be a good outcome for Huskies.
Very rational post….you must be new to this Conference Realignment world.
 
Disagree, I find the placement or not of Connecticut in a P5 conference enormously important, it's just the need to disprove random posters that I find meaningless.
Agreed. I feel it is important too. That is why
I questioned GoKu’s validity to some degree.
This thread is hanging on is every post.
 
Is it possible that, with the opportunity to add Stanford, the XII goes to 18, taking all 4 corner schools plus Stanford and us? Or does that require too much of Fox and ESPN?

Still assuming we're out, but just wondering how hard a ceiling 16 is.

If the PAC is dead and there's no need for money to be shelled out there, they have budget room and it will cost less than the PAC alone, so I don't see why not.
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,197
Messages
4,556,521
Members
10,442
Latest member
Virginiafan


Top Bottom