- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 29,743
- Reaction Score
- 47,171
Here is an actual tweet to interrupt our daily dose of pure speculation.
Looking forward to BC’s payout getting right sized.
Here is an actual tweet to interrupt our daily dose of pure speculation.
Philips comments make you wonder if he's in over his head as we've seen with other Conference Commissioners. Some of the statements he made are really out of the 1980's.
Philips comments make you wonder if he's in over his head as we've seen with other Conference Commissioners. Some of the statements he made are really out of the 1980's.
Here is an actual tweet to interrupt our daily dose of pure speculation.
If the members vote to approve the new distributions, I don't think it blows up the GOR. I don't know what the ACC rules are for making a change like that but, unless it requires a super majority, they would probably get the votes since there are enough haves to outvote the have nots.I wonder if Phillips realizes that altering payouts after the fact could become grounds to dismantle the GOR?
If the members vote to approve the new distributions, I don't think it blows up the GOR. I don't know what the ACC rules are for making a change like that but, unless it requires a super majority, they would probably get the votes since there are enough haves to outvote the have nots.
Plus, the schools it will affect (Cuse & BC among others) don't have any leverage. It's not like they have a place to go. As much as the Cuse blowhards want to claim NYC, if not for their ACC lifeline, they would be us without all the hoops rings. At the end of the day they would just have to sit back & take it
What moves do you think would make sense at this point for those conf outside of the P2?You just have to wonder when somebody outside the SEC/B1G is going to start doing something/anything that makes sense.
I don’t know, the under informed will pledge away the future fairly easily, but take a dollar of what they already have a way and they’ll scream bloody murder.This. It's not going to be forced on the BCs of the world over their objections. They will "consent" to it when told if they don't all the schools whose rights are worth money will be leaving as soon as they can.
Philips comments make you wonder if he's in over his head as we've seen with other Conference Commissioners. Some of the statements he made are really out of the 1980's.
I get it but, it just seems that outside of Jim Delaney, Kevin Warren, Mike Slive and Greg Sankey EVERY other decision related to CR has turned to Spartacus for everyone involved.Which in turn has to make me ask the same questions about business executives who run pharmaceutical companies, insurance companies, energy companies, weapons & munitions companies, etc, etc, etc.
I get it but, it just seems that outside of Jim Delaney, Kevin Warren, Mike Slive and Greg Sankey EVERY other decision related to CR has turned to Spartacus for everyone involved.
Miami & Va Tech left the Big East in July 2004. In the 18 years of Conference Realignment since, the stupidity displayed inside the CR world has truly been astounding
I get it but, it just seems that outside of Jim Delaney, Kevin Warren, Mike Slive and Greg Sankey EVERY other decision related to CR has turned to Spartacus for everyone involved.
Miami & Va Tech left the Big East in July 2004. In the 18 years of Conference Realignment since, the stupidity displayed inside the CR world has truly been astounding
The ACC picked the wrong school to leverage the NYC market.Let’s assume the ACC creates an innovative strategy to generate revenue. The B1G and SEC can simply duplicate that and probably raise even more money than the ACC can doing the same thing.
The ACC added Syracuse for the NYC market.
The B1G added Rutgers for the NYC market.
We only need to look at current media contracts to see which school actually delivered the money from the NYC market. The B1G can leverage NYC in ways the ACC cannot. This is just one example as to why the ACC can innovate all they want, but the B1G and SEC can duplicate that innovation and do it better.
And if tiered payouts were to become reality in the ACC, it would make UConn a bit more attractive to them because of all of the non-football related positives we would bring with basketball, etc (and if we can get football more attractive it just makes us even more of a bargain for the ACC). Seems like we should hope for a tiered ACC to occur ASAP to at least have an option to staying BE/Independent down the road/before the ACC GOR expires.If the members vote to approve the new distributions, I don't think it blows up the GOR. I don't know what the ACC rules are for making a change like that but, unless it requires a super majority, they would probably get the votes since there are enough haves to outvote the have nots.
Plus, the schools it will affect (Cuse & BC among others) don't have any leverage. It's not like they have a place to go. As much as the Cuse blowhards want to claim NYC, if not for their ACC lifeline, they would be us without all the hoops rings. At the end of the day they would just have to sit back & take it
They can only be talking about one man…So it's a "gold standard" consultant that he won't reveal the name of?
Thats's so cute
I’m sure I’ll regret asking, but “stupid” for who exactly? Who in the SEC B1G thinks any of this is stupid?I get it but, it just seems that outside of Jim Delaney, Kevin Warren, Mike Slive and Greg Sankey EVERY other decision related to CR has turned to Spartacus for everyone involved.
Miami & Va Tech left the Big East in July 2004. In the 18 years of Conference Realignment since, the stupidity displayed inside the CR world has truly been astounding