- Joined
- Jun 1, 2013
- Messages
- 154
- Reaction Score
- 246
Maybe not such a good sign for UC that Kasich is now stumping for them?
Please read the context of my post/reply.So we are getting posts passing on stories from 7 years ago and a month ago. Seriously? Good old fashioned BB board hanging is warranted.
Please read the context of my post/reply.
No worries...Fair enough. Now I have to read context?
So many threads that I end up skimming. My bad.
I really hope the Big 12 calls ESPNs bluff. Regardless of UConn's fate, I am simply sick of this network. Who knows what the landscape will look like in 2025. Roll the dice.
UConn most definitely checks that box on a few fronts!Ben Baby @Ben_Baby · 1h1 hour ago
Gary Patterson's notice to future Big 12 teams: Bring something of value to the table
Gary Patterson on expanding Big 12: 'It's not the conference's job to make that university better' | SportsDay
Patterson told reporters at Wednesday's team media day that any future members should be bringing something worth adding as he discussed the topic of realignment.
"It's not the conference's job to make that university better," Patterson said. "It's the university's job to make the conference better, whether it's in football, academics, whatever it is."
Patterson said the list of expansion schools "is probably down to six."
"My job is just to win football games," Patterson said. "I'm going to leave it to all the rest of them to worry about all the rest of it. I'll play whoever they decide they want me to play and go from there."
Ben Baby @Ben_Baby · 1h1 hour ago
Gary Patterson's notice to future Big 12 teams: Bring something of value to the table
Gary Patterson on expanding Big 12: 'It's not the conference's job to make that university better' | SportsDay
Patterson told reporters at Wednesday's team media day that any future members should be bringing something worth adding as he discussed the topic of realignment.
"It's not the conference's job to make that university better," Patterson said. "It's the university's job to make the conference better, whether it's in football, academics, whatever it is."
Patterson said the list of expansion schools "is probably down to six."
"My job is just to win football games," Patterson said. "I'm going to leave it to all the rest of them to worry about all the rest of it. I'll play whoever they decide they want me to play and go from there."
Brett McMurphy@McMurphyESPN
AAC's Mike Aresco: "The American is a Power 6 conference." Maybe so, but that’s equivalent of finishing 4th at Olympics. It doesn’t matter
Shawn Scott Smith @luckycreature · Aug 2
@McMurphyESPN an employee of a company diminishing one of his employers affiliate conferences and a great partner.
Carlos Rodriguez @CRod526 · Aug 2
@McMurphyESPN Keep this P5/G5 crap and ESPN and the rest of tv media will kill CFB and will have to look for content elsewhere.
Michael Medlin @mtmedlin1976 · Aug 2
@McMurphyESPN I wouldn't mind being paid like we're the P6. With all the AAC has accomplished getting 1/10 of b12 & ACC monies is an insult
warpigpgh @warpigpgh · Aug 2
@McMurphyESPN I can't believe the Group of 5 haven't sued to get more opportunity for the CFP.
David Honeycutt @dhoney1726 · Aug 2
@McMurphyESPN Big 12 seems to think AAC is Power conference material. Keep up the sham.
Bobby Hayes @RobertH15290250 · Aug 2
@McMurphyESPN Pretty harsh words. Did working my at CBS matter a few years ago? Do your friends that work at Fox and Yahoo Sports matter?
Dave Ackermann @ack4wvu · 3h3 hours ago
@TalkinACCSports @McMurphyESPN UC Houston BYU and UCONN are better than many existing P5 schools #pureESPNbullshit!
Brett McMurphy@McMurphyESPN
@ack4wvu yes. It’s ESPN’s fault they’re not in a Power 5 league
John E. Hoover @johnehoover · 10h10 hours ago
My column today: What if all this #Big12 expansion talk is really just a clever ruse?
John E. Hoover: What if all this Big 12 expansion talk is really just a clever ruse?
Maybe all this tough talk about expansion and television contract pro rata adjustments is really just a smokescreen for what the Big 12 really wants: a league television network.
Yes, the Big 12 is the only Power 5 conference with 10 teams. But now, the Big 12 is also the only Power 5 conference without a television network.
Ten members actually is a workable model, so long as it’s stable. The Big 12 nearly had two teams in the inaugural College Football Playoff, and last year the Big 12 landed both a playoff football team and a Final Four basketball team. As Bowlsby and Boren reminded us so frequently leading up to July, that indicates a position of strength, not weakness.
But now, being the only Power 5 conference without a TV network, that is a sign of weakness.
Think about it. Does the Big 12 really want to add Cincinnati or Houston or Memphis or Colorado State at the risk of jeopardizing its relationships (and future negotiating leverage) with ESPN and Fox?
Maybe the Big 12’s sudden, unexpected interest in expansion and its unusually hardline stance on pro rata adjustments is really just a big negotiating chip to force ESPN and Fox to give the Big 12 what it really wants: a television network.
More at:
John E. Hoover: What if all this Big 12 expansion talk is really just a clever ruse?
How great would it be if the remaining AAC schools go after ESPN and this moron McMurphy's tweets end up being used as evidence that helps the AAC win a windfall day. Whether UConn was the recipient of that windfall or in the B-12 it would make me smile that's for sure.If I was ESPN's legal department, I would tell McMurphy to cool it. The article a few days ago indicating that ESPN was manipulating the Big 12, and its conflict issue between the AAC and Big 12, are a big legal problem for ESPN, and at some point they are going to piss someone off that doesn't care about the consequences of suing the P5 and ESPN. There are now multiple public sources describing ESPN using its market power to fix prices, and dozens of universities harmed by ESPN's exercise of that market power.
The short answer is yes, of course this could be the end game, but then you remember, what's the point of a conf network for a league with just TX and some rural plains states? How is that a conf advertisers want to go big on? And so, this league needs to expand to survive, the footprint just ins't good enough.
Yep which is why again adding Houston is a really bad idea. UT is going to get the channel (if it's a linear channel) distribution in Houston whether they're in the league or not. You have to go to new markets. UConn/Cincy/UCF/USF are the best options for markets. And maybe BYU if you believe they have national reach.