Is this really a key tweet?Predictions from Athlon. It sounds like Memphis and USF are just about a sure thing next round.
https://athlonsports.com/college-fo...ege-football-conference-realignment-expansion
The MAC Becomes a 14-Team League
UMass will join the MAC next year (2025) to bring the MAC membership to 13 teams. Even if the conference prefers all-sports members, the MAC eventually grows by one with a football-only deal with UConn.
And if UConn isn't the right fit, perhaps a FCS team (maybe Illinois State?) fits as the No. 14 member.
Translation ... if UConn football isn't worthy / good enough for the MAC they would look for more viable FCS options.
UConn is different than UMass, though. UConn is one of, if not the top basketball brands in the game. While UConn football isn’t quite at the level of its basketball programs, they are still a nationally recognized school. UMass isn’t as widely known. The Big10 wouldn’t take affiliate teams until John’s Hopkins lacrosse and Notre Dame Hockey. Why couldn’t the MAC, who could stand to use some brand recognition and allow UConn a spot. Gives Buffalo and UMass a partner school. Maybe if UConn were to throw in a couple of out of conference games the MAC’s way, it would really help the brand.I don't think UConn will go to the MAC for football. The MAC gave UMass an ultimatum a few years back when they were football-only............either join the MAC for all sports, or leave all together. UMass left and went independent in football. Just recently, UMass decided to join for all sports.
The MAC would have to change its stance for this to even be a remote possibility.
The quick answer is no we will not want to play on the MAC. If we are to join another conference, it will either be the B12 or a version of the ACC.UConn is different than UMass, though. UConn is one of, if not the top basketball brands in the game. While UConn football isn’t quite at the level of its basketball programs, they are still a nationally recognized school. UMass isn’t as widely known. The Big10 wouldn’t take affiliate teams until John’s Hopkins lacrosse and Notre Dame Hockey. Why couldn’t the MAC, who could stand to use some brand recognition and allow UConn a spot. Gives Buffalo and UMass a partner school. Maybe if UConn were to throw in a couple of out of conference games the MAC’s way, it would really help the brand.
The big question is will UConn want to play a MAC schedule to get where they want to go?
The quick answer is no we will not want to play on the MAC. If we are to join another conference, it will either be the B12 or a version of the ACC.
I think he meant joining basketballSpeak for yourself. The MAC would be a big improvement for our football team. It would give us a chance to win the G5 auto-bid.
Yeah, if you joined the MAC in full, I would question everything. Not that that you need me to say it, but the only way you should be leaving the Big East is for the P4, preferably the Big10 or a non nuked ACC.I think he meant joining basketball
Predictions from Athlon. It sounds like Memphis and USF are just about a sure thing next round.
https://athlonsports.com/college-fo...ege-football-conference-realignment-expansion
The MAC Becomes a 14-Team League
UMass will join the MAC next year (2025) to bring the MAC membership to 13 teams. Even if the conference prefers all-sports members, the MAC eventually grows by one with a football-only deal with UConn.
And if UConn isn't the right fit, perhaps a FCS team (maybe Illinois State?) fits as the No. 14 member.
Translation ... if UConn football isn't worthy / good enough for the MAC they would look for more viable FCS options.
If we don’t get into the ACC or B12, a football only move to G5 makes sense. But I think the MAC may be the worst of the G5 options. If we want to just park our football in a G5, my hope is we can convince the SunBelt or MWC to add us for football after a good season this year.Speak for yourself. The MAC would be a big improvement for our football team. It would give us a chance to win the G5 auto-bid.
Agree. If it’s football only we should align ourselves with the strongest G5. Used to be the AAC, not anymore.If we don’t get into the ACC or B12, a football only move to G5 makes sense. But I think the MAC may be the worst of the G5 options. If we want to just park our football in a G5, my hope is we can convince the SunBelt or MWC to add us for football after a good season this year.
If we don’t get into the ACC or B12, a football only move to G5 makes sense. But I think the MAC may be the worst of the G5 options. If we want to just park our football in a G5, my hope is we can convince the SunBelt or MWC to add us for football after a good season this year.
I agree Liberty has significantly improved in football. The school is willing to pay for top coaches and appears to have pretty good NIL fund. Football requires significant funds to become s consistent top 25 team.Liberty just proved you don't need to be in the strongest G5 to win the auto-bid. CUSA is the worst G5. Geographically the MAC mases sense for UConn. If we join a G5 conference I just want to see wins, the opponent is almost irrelevant, being in a weaker conference will have its advantages.
Predictions from Athlon. It sounds like Memphis and USF are just about a sure thing next round.
https://athlonsports.com/college-fo...ege-football-conference-realignment-expansion
The MAC Becomes a 14-Team League
UMass will join the MAC next year (2025) to bring the MAC membership to 13 teams. Even if the conference prefers all-sports members, the MAC eventually grows by one with a football-only deal with UConn.
And if UConn isn't the right fit, perhaps a FCS team (maybe Illinois State?) fits as the No. 14 member.
Translation ... if UConn football isn't worthy / good enough for the MAC they would look for more viable FCS options.
I don't think UConn will go to the MAC for football. The MAC gave UMass an ultimatum a few years back when they were football-only............either join the MAC for all sports, or leave all together. UMass left and went independent in football. Just recently, UMass decided to join for all sports.
The MAC would have to change its stance for this to even be a remote possibility.
“UConn football not quite on the level of its basketball programs”. That is an understatement. Comparing UConn football to the basketball programs is comparing UConn basketball to somebody like University of New Hampshire basketball programs.UConn is different than UMass, though. UConn is one of, if not the top basketball brands in the game. While UConn football isn’t quite at the level of its basketball programs, they are still a nationally recognized school. UMass isn’t as widely known. The Big10 wouldn’t take affiliate teams until John’s Hopkins lacrosse and Notre Dame Hockey. Why couldn’t the MAC, who could stand to use some brand recognition and allow UConn a spot. Gives Buffalo and UMass a partner school. Maybe if UConn were to throw in a couple of out of conference games the MAC’s way, it would really help the brand.
The big question is will UConn want to play a MAC schedule to get where they want to go?
As long as being in a weak G5 won't impact recruiting. We just need good players to compete.Liberty just proved you don't need to be in the strongest G5 to win the auto-bid. CUSA is the worst G5. Geographically the MAC mases sense for UConn. If we join a G5 conference I just want to see wins, the opponent is almost irrelevant, being in a weaker conference will have its advantages.
If we don’t get into the ACC or B12, a football only move to G5 makes sense. But I think the MAC may be the worst of the G5 options. If we want to just park our football in a G5, my hope is we can convince the SunBelt or MWC to add us for football after a good season this year.
Seems like an easy thing to accommodateWe would probably need to provide a few (2?) basketball games to get anyone to take football only.
We would probably need to provide a few (2?) basketball games to get anyone to take football only.
As long the conference all your other sports are in doesn’t sponsor football. Similar to hockey being in Hockey East because the Big East doesn’t sponsor hockey.Are you allowed to put your football team in one conference and all of your other sports in a different one?
when you think about it it would be better for the schools to be able to “shop around” conferences for various sports…it’s always been stupid to use football to dictate basketball and olympic sport travel.As long the conference all your other sports are in doesn’t sponsor football. Similar to hockey being in Hockey East because the Big East doesn’t sponsor hockey.
Wouldn’t be surprised to see a lawsuit challenging that along the way - it’ll be more billable hours for someone.
Well, stupid from the outside looking in, but from the inside looking out, it's been pretty darn lucrative.when you think about it it would be better for the schools to be able to “shop around” conferences for various sports…it’s always been stupid to use football to dictate basketball and olympic sport travel.