- Joined
- Feb 22, 2014
- Messages
- 2,272
- Reaction Score
- 9,649
Colorado, BYU, UA, ASU + a bunch of schools in Texas for recruiting purposes v. Going 3/4 of the way across the country to play Syracuse and Virginia. Please make it make sense…
Don't know but I've always gotten it.I will admit I have zero knowledge of how that works. So wouldn’t that mean every market gets ACCN as well? Or is it just a northeast thing because of ESPN being located in Bristol?
Yeah Utah and ASU were both dragged kicking and screaming. Utah especially. Their football coaches press conference about it was how they'll be in the Big 10 soon and that the Big XII was just temporary. Their arrogance is umatched.Utah did not want to go to the B12 . The last place they want to be is in a conference with is BYU . At the time they had a gun to their heads
If they knew then that the ACC was an option. The ACC could have gotten them plus the Arizona schools. Even U of A would have bought in .
I really don’t think it’s grasped back East in what disrespect the PAC schools had for many of the B12 schools. . The ACC from a peer prospective is a much better fit for these largely AAU schools. The Big 12 would be on shaky ground if they did that .
How was signing the GOR optional for them?Utah if i remember was the only school to not sign the Big12s GOR., but the move would make zero sense for them. They have their hopes on getting a B1G invite it seems.
It’s not permanent. They have until something like August 1st to sign. It was part of their negotiations when they entered the league. They want a Big10 invite, but I’m not sure if they knew something or just hoping.How was signing the GOR optional for them?
Well that's kind of BS, since they essentially blocked UConn by talking that slot.It’s not permanent. They have until something like August 1st to sign. It was part of their negotiations when they entered the league. They want a Big10 invite, but I’m not sure if they knew something or just hoping.
If these rumors have ANY kind of credibility we will find out soon enough if UConn was really next up like everyone suggested. Or would it be a PAC2 leftover or some other crappe.Well that's kind of BS, since they essentially blocked UConn by talking that slot.
I wonder about that. I also wonder if the perceived instability of the ACC would lead Big 12 presidents to look there.If these rumors have ANY kind of credibility we will find out soon enough if UConn was really next up like everyone suggested. Or would it be a PAC2 leftover or some other crappe.
Good question. Some of these schools know to play these games much better than our guys.How was signing the GOR optional for them?
But our guys are great at monitoring!!!Good question. Some of these schools know to play these games much better than our guys.
Oh, we monitor the sh.it out of situations...But our guys are great at monitoring!!!
Why would the B1G want a school in a state with less people than CT?Utah if i remember was the only school to not sign the Big12s GOR., but the move would make zero sense for them. They have their hopes on getting a B1G invite it seems.
They don’t want to be in the Big12 so they don’t want to sign anything that keep them there if they can get out.Why would the B1G want a school in a state with less people than CT?
And it appears that the CT governor and legislators have done absolutely nothing with ESPN re: UConn.If (as suggested in a different thread) ESPN kicks additional cash in for this to happen they will then have overstepped their bounds to a massive level (while leaving little to no cover or deniability).
I imagine that a number of schools would then look into grounds for lawsuits against the worldwide leader.
This could get interesting.